Full list of Trump's sexual assaults

Drip, drip, drip....

 

Victim number 14 comes forward:

Ninni Laaksonen

A 12th woman has come forward to accuse Republican nominee Donald Trump of sexual misconduct. Former Miss Finland Ninni Laaksonen, now 30, told Finnish newspaper Ilta-Sanomat in an interview published Thursday that Trump grabbed her before an appearance on The Late Show with David Letterman in July of 2006.

"Before the show, we were photographed outside the building. Trump stood right next to me and suddenly he squeezed my butt. He really grabbed my butt," Laaksonen said. "I don’t think anybody saw it, but I flinched and thought: 'What is happening?'"

Laaksonen noted someone had told her at another event that year Trump liked her "because I looked like Melania [Trump] when she was younger." Trump married his third wife just one year prior to the alleged incident.

Source

 

You have been repeatedly challenged to post any evidence of sexual missconduct that was available to the public before Clinton's first Presidential run. Now compare what we know about Trump before the election. The double standard is yours.

Now if your point is that moral degeneracy should not be taken into account in judging a Presidential candidate that is certainly an opinion you and the Moral Majority are entitled to hold.

 

Its not MY STANDARD that was set with Bill Clinton and the Democrats. I've been quite clear I hope any woman who he may have assaulted sue the you know what out of him.

But that no longer disqualifies a person from being President remember.

In fact he could do like Bill and get other women to lie on his behalf and then lie himself and that would not disqualify him would it?

 

Ahhh the Flowers scandal where he created a hostile work place. And of course the Troopergate book was published in 1994 and then the Jones scandal and he was reelected. And had the Democrats the chance they would have reelected him to a third term and they worship him to this day.

So enough with the strawman.

I didn't create the standard that's you guys, you just issue it selectively.

- - - Updated - - -

And?.......

She should sue him, how many times does it have to be repeated?

- - - Updated - - -

And?.......

She should sue him, how many times does it have to be repeated?

- - - Updated - - -

A woman who sells her body for sex gets upset someone offered her $10,000?

 

This isn't about her, it's about Trump.

 

Oh for sure, these allegations help trump a lot. It's no stretch to see that this man, who has no respect for women, would behave in such a fashion.

 

It's about her allegation, try again

A woman who sells her body for sex gets upset someone offered her $10,000? Seems like he was offering her a pretty good deal wouldn't you say?

- - - Updated - - -

They certainly helped Bill Clinton you don't remember how the Democrats circled the wagons and turned out the vote for him? And if you mentioned his sexual behavior you were labeled a "panty-sniffer".

 

Trump's entire career shows ample evidence of his unusually high regard for women.

“it's funny. My own mother was a housewife all her life. And yet it turned out that I've hired a lot of women for top jobs, and they’ve been among my best people. Often, in fact, they are far more effective than the men around them.” Art Of The Deal, Trump, Ballantine Books, 1987, p. 173.

People know that crude sexual talk and the objectification of the opposite sex is a common and irrelevant fact of life.

When late election cycle accusations of sexual assaults pop up they should always be dismissed as typical incredible partisan attacks.

 

You cannot be frigging serious. The man is a complete misogynist to the core. Even the most simple minded person could see that.

Misogynists know that. People who respect women, their mothers, and have daughters don't

What can be dismissed is the entire Trump campaign. Along with every person who ever cast a vote for him.

 

Not surprisingly, you're confused. The impeachment hearings were in 98, after Bill was up for re-election. Only an ignorant person would think that these allegations against trump help him one bit. To be fair, there are a good amount of misogynists on the right who probably cheer at his tales of sexual assault. However, they are a dying breed.

 

We knew about his behaviors before then as I already noted to you and Jones filed her lawsuit in 1994, and he could have been removed during the impeachment but his acts according to the Democrats did not disqualify him from holding the office and they would have elected him a third time were it not for the Constitution and they worship him to this day and defend his acts and say that the impeachment should never have occurred AT ALL in spite of knowing full well his sexual behavior so enough with the strawman.

Nope no confusion on my part but lots of denial on your part.

You seem to forget the 60 Minutes interview and what the Flower's scandal was all about. Give me your take on it.

 

You seem to forget that Bill Clinton isn't running for president.

 

Let's agree then that neither of these people is qualified to be President.

 

Trump's entire career has advanced the power and influence of women. OTH, the Clintons are proven misogynists. Both of them have slandered and retaliated against the women Bill Clinton abused and assaulted. The Clintons really are bad to the bone. But my assessment is far kinder than some of their critics from the Left.

“So, here it is. For the typical 99%’r American, the camel’s back has broken by the last straw sourced in Washington so many times the camel doesn’t even have what you’d refer to as a spin anymore.

The Clinton’s need to have their assets seized, Giustra needs to arrested, and at a minimum racketeering charges need to pursued against the whole damn bunch of ‘em….BEFORE IT GETS REPEATED WITH, SAY, THE TPP.
Hillary needs to face charges of Espionage for her e-mail. And if guilty, like with Edward Snowden, all options for disposition of her miserable guilty ass should be on the table including the death penalty.” http://www.thomhartmann.com/users/t...agreements-get-access-taxpayer-money-and-enri

Personally, I think the death penalty should be off the table - I am too moderate for that.

 

ROFL is that strawman all you are left with now? You seem to forget he did twice and the Democrats and the left elected him twice and would do so again if they could.

And again what do you think the Flowers scandal was all about?

 

I've never supported either one of them but that does not change the fact that the main issue the Democrats are presenting as to why he should not be President is his treatment of women.

And in particular this woman who sells her body for sex gets upset someone offered her $10,000? Seems like he was offering her a pretty good deal wouldn't you say?

You brought her up, how about reconciling what I posed?

 

That's pretty much all I need to read to be convinced that your grip on reality is tenuous at best.