Gay Cabal Replaces Science, and Soon, the Constitution Itself via DOMA & Prop 8

When researching how the GLBT movement got started in bedrock, it's good to cite history:

We've seen the movement employ sympathy, especially milking "gay teen suicides" and "homophobia" to levels bordering a person engaged in defensive behaviors.

We've seen them reverse-demonize anyone and everyone for daring to hold an opposing viewpoint from the Big Rainbow steamroller.

We've seen the "zapping" [blackmail] of various political entities and most recently dethroning the Pope, as [coincidentally] pushes are simultaneously underway for gay priests to be accepted, along with priests [gay?] marrying..

But someone who engages in milking sympathy at inapproprate levels, or who lashes out at people merely questioning their increasingly odd behaviors, or who even blackmails people to go along with their behaviors, is showing classic signs of mental illness.

Too bad though that we can't treat them for it anymore. The only option the cabal has left us is to ratify their insanity as "sane" and go along with their coup, or else...

After all, if they can dethrone the Pope and convince the Supreme Court that several states may not defy the few that have passed gay marriage, thereby federally making gay marriage legal across all 50 states, how could anyone resist the momentum they've put in place?

So in the new US Consitution, if one state upholds that people can carry concealed weapons, then to keep that playing field level for the purposes of defense, all 50 must as well..

If one state says a 16 year old can marry, then all 50 must as well...

If one state says multiple people can marry [polygamy] then all 50 must as well...

If one state legalizes prostitution, [a sexual behavior] then all 50 must as well...

This new order of enacting and enforcing laws around certain human "behaviors-as-rights" is going to set up a very sticky Constitutional-law situation.

I doubt that back in 1970, the APA could've imagined that this overweening group that removed consensus from their science and replaced it, via forceful methods, with a dictatorship and self-diagnosis by the mentally-ill of themselves, would've ever reached such lengths as to threaten [successfully] the Pope himself and force the Gay Agenda clear into the ranks of the foundation of christianity?

Of course, the Roman Catholic Church hasn't ratified priests [gay] marrying [yet], but one has to wonder if gay militants can force the Pope to resign, how much longer it will be?

Will there ever be a line drawn for them?

And to wrap up by answering two questions.

1. No, I'm not christian and

2. Yes, in spite of the albatross, this stinging brand hanging around my party's neck, I'm still just barely a democrat, in favor of green energy, universal heatlhcare and bringing jobs home.

 

What is up with your obsession with homosexuals, and seeming burning need to force them back in the closet? You afraid they're going to recruit you and "turn" you gay?

 

No. He's angry that he never got an offer.

 

Why does the only "yes" option in your poll also require stating that the respondent is a "gay activist?"

Anyway, I knew how it happened because I listened to that particular episode of This American Life. It was pretty fascinating. What's hilarious is that you're making it out to be some sort of evil coup. Granted, it was a coup, but it had more to do with the fact that none of the dinosaurs in charge the APA would reconsider the very flawed research that got homosexuality listed in the DSM in the first place.

You may think homosexuality is a mental disorder, but there isn't any valid evidence to back that up.

 

Granted, it was a coup, eh? I wasn't taught in my science classes in college that medicine responded to "coups"....learn something new every day. I must be old-fashioned because how science used to go with concepts and research was by peer-review without repurcussions for things like religious or cult-like beliefs. Many in favor of this coup by gays of the APA probably are some of the fist line of outcriers against the fringe neocons insisting [against overwhelming scientific consensus and what their eyes plainly see] that climate change isn't real...lol..

Funny how the extremes actually agree on fanaticism trumping science...and they said they had no common ground..

That's because anyone who knew, and did nothing to outcry against such an upset of rational process, is, by definition, a drinker of the Koolaide...

 

The Gay Cabal won.....when they got "God fearin' Christian values" voters to vote for a VIce-President whose daughter was openly gay and even got married to her girlfriend and had children.

 

One wonders what "gay" is [see OP article & link] when one considers Cheney's daughter and the reasons she might have for not being able to form trusting relationships with men. After the coup on the APA, therapists aren't allowed to talk about why Cheney's daughter is the way she is...because if any of that therapy uncovered issues that led to Cheney's daughter having an epiphany and thereby wanting to change her orientation back to normal, that therapist will have walked into a gray area where he might lose his license to practice..

Incidentally, Cheney's daughter and her girlfriend never had kids together. It's impossible for two women to reproduce.

 

It is impossible for two women to exchange DNA and reproduce with each other. Two women can reproduce in exactly the same way that a couple with an infertile husband can reproduce.

Now rational caring people do not mock a straight couple who need third party assistance to reproduce. But a gay couple? That is fair game to the homophobes.

 

No, the hetero couple agrees that male sperm, the husband or someone else's makes two parents. The homo couple has to agree. Two women cannot ever be two "regular" parents.

 

The coup was needed to get stubborn individuals out of power who were demonstrably anti-science when it came to something they were biased about. Medicine didn't respond to a coup, whatever that means. There was plenty of peer-reviewed research at the time that contradicted the flawed research used to justify the inclusion of homosexuality in the DSM. Science agreed (and still agrees) with the people who took over the APA. The people who were ousted or overridden were the ones with a "cult-like belief" that homosexuality was bad.

So someone like me, who wasn't even alive in the '70s to "outcry against" it, is "a drinker of the Koolaide?" Please. For someone who constantly tries to use statistical information to his/her advantage, you don't seem to know a damn thing about forcing bias into a poll. Consciously or not, you've made one of the choices you disagree with difficult to choose as an answer. Pathetic. And you label anyone who disagrees with you as a "drinker of the Koolaide." Way to insult the people you're supposedly trying to converse with.

 

1. Where was the "outrage" from the anti-gay "Christian values" voters at the Cheneys? Used to be they blamed homosexuality on "Parents with no values" and such. Soon as it's a Republican Veep nominee in 2000......they go silent running? And again in 2004?

2. Artificial insemination. And again....Grandpa Dick Cheney still big on the Fox News and beloved by the Right.

Seems the "Cabal" won over you guys as well.

- - - Updated - - -

"ever"?.....oh, SCIENCE (boo, hiss) is working on that. It's called "cloning". You may have heard of it.

 

Silly, you're assuming I'm anti-science. Go back and read the OP

So they extracted sperm from Cheney's girlfriend and implanted it into Cheney's daughter?

I'm pretty sure a man was involved and necessary at some point..

Like Stalin, Hitler, Caligula and Dick Cheney's other peers, few are willing to voice any opposing opinion, even if strongly held.

 

This progressive revolutionary movement took place in many Western institutions JUST LIKE THIS. The results are being felt now. Schools that can't teach. Gov'ts that can't secure borders. Bureaucrats willing to put just about anyone with a sob story on the dole or disability list. Journalists unwilling to be objective and trying to bring about "change" (the progressive revolution). Mayors asking gangs to please murder in the alley and leave the kids alone. Prosecutors indicting to prevent riots. Police forces unwilling to stop rioting (UK 2011). It goes on and on and on.

 

Easy there Don. One step at a time. You can't put out a forest fire with a nuclear bomb. It isn't healthy or ethical. Try just chainsawing a fire-line and backburning.

 

Did YOU vote against Bush/Cheney in 2000 and 2004?

 

The hetrosexualization of AIDS in the mid and late 1980s was the empowerment of the Rainbow Mafia. This was a grand political coup that involved academia, medicine, the complicit media and friendly Dem whores. It was economically damaging to the entire world by mis-allocation of resources through lying statistics and BS science.

.

 

Rave on, Archie....and tell Dingbat to stifle.

 

Yes and heatedly so. I'm a Clinton democratic to the bone marrow; except the NAFTA mistake.

 

So why does a "Clinton democratic" hate gays???

 

I hear you, but the macro reinforces your point about the micro.

 

A group of people rising up to usurp those who rule because they don't agree with the old ways and want to push for a change that (in their minds) creates a better life.

Yep, sounds like America to me.


Or does it only count when the ruling class is the British and not the APA?

 

No rave, just political fact. Are you uncomfortable with the level of failure of the Left's social engineering?

- - - Updated - - -

Does it count with the Tea Party?

 

I don't hate gays. Disagreeing does not equal hate.

I had a gay friend who was so by being molested and then going on to compulsively seek out men for sex thereafter while falling in love with women. His confusion led to anger and his anger led to him killing hundreds, if not thousands of other gay men/victims by purposefully infecting them with HIV he'd contracted. He could've sought treatment for the molestation and subsequent artificial-orientation foisted on him, but even then "gay was OK" and he was encouraged to "embrace who he was"... Anger forced underground almost never results in a healthy end...

My objections to the Gay Agenda aren't born from hate, they're born from sadness at losing this family friend in his early 30s to AIDS, the thousands he took with him, and all born from a misunderstanding of the genesis of artificial sexual orientation. My mantra is "compassion, but not promotion"... And to understand what is going on before we as a titanic-society normalize an iceberg we do not yet know the depths of..

 

It does. Though their take-over attempt seems to have sputtered out a bit. The sequester seems like its going to be a make or break for them. If it works, they will have a successful pillar of which to base their political platform. If it fails, they are pretty much done.

 

I'm sorry for your friend, but it sounds like he had mental issues stemming from his initial molestation. Its a sad part of the stigma of mental disorder (of which I believe being truly 'Gay' is not apart of. IMO) that confuses people into not seeking professional help.

Now, that said, I ask 'What about all the gay people who lived healthy normal lives and still grew up 'gay'?