Genius Harvard Lefty "its unclear if men have a physical advantage"

So if they don't, and a large man ever punches one of their daughters in the face, I expect these ivy league losers to say "thats ok, it was a FAIR FIGHT"

https://www.breitbart.com/sports/20...unclear-whether-men-athletic-advantage-women/
The leftists at the Harvard Crimson have spoken out against transgender athlete bans and claimed that the evidence to support the case that men have a physical advantage over women is “less conclusive.”

However, in the process of making the assertion, the article ignored all evidence to the contrary to support their own claim that transgender athlete participation is wholly benign.

Conclusion, the left HATES female athletes. Thoughts? Opinions?
Also I have a question. if MEN that dominate women's sports were always ranked low in the mens divisions and then OWNED when they switched to "FEMALE", isn't that a clue that there is an advantage?

 

'A wonderful protest recently happened when girls at a track meet refused to compete against a biological male in the shot put. Instead, they simply stepped into the circle, stepped out, and called it a scratch.'

'The girls weren’t disrespectful. They just refused to play in an unfair arena. Good for them.'

'They were, of course, suspended from future competitions.'

Now, we’ve got a lawsuit on our hands.

'The Left has adopted Unreality, and the only way to put an end to it is to expose its absurdity. We now have biological girls being punished for resisting demands to compete against biological males in girls' sports. Until these kind of through-the-looking-glass policies start costing the people who impose them money, they will continue.'

Yes. Sue the crap out of them, really make it hurt.

'The suit contends the district has violated the girls’ First Amendment rights as well as their right to due process.'

'West Virginia has a law banning males from participating in women’s sports. However, two days before the competition, a federal appeals court overturned the law — as least as it applied to Pepper-Jackson, a 13-year-old boy taking puberty blockers and estrogen injections.'

'We have two cases here, one is whether Pepper-Jackson should be allowed to compete against middle school girls (we won’t get into whether a middle schooler should be on hormones or puberty blockers today). The other is a free speech issue.'

'there is the free speech issue, and this is what I think is going to break the authorities’ back.'

https://hotair.com/headlines/2024/05/02/it-should-never-have-come-to-this-but-n3787665

Actually you are free to state the same position as those who are in authority, and if you state a differing position, that's disruptive.