George Zimmerman's Girlfriend Wants to Drop Charges, 'Be With Him'

Then you did not understand my point and that is typical of "Zimmerman-lovers: on this forum

The point I was making was that those who are in GZ corner will do anything and everything to defend the guy. RosePop and Doombug are two posters that fit that description to a "T."

Not all threads created were created by Zimmerman haters. Not all posts who criticize GZ are Zimmerman haters.

You may want to come up with something a little more original than the labels you are using now, which goes against that motif that a person is innocent until proven guilty. If you are labeling someone as a hater, then you are being judge and jury on someone that you know nothing about.l

You may want to look at RosePop and Doombug posts. their posts are indicative of what I am describing. Your post is also indicative of what I am describing.

Yes, saying he is innocent is fine, but you must apply that concept equally. Otherwise, you look the bigger idiot by stating that TM was a thug or that those who criticize GZ are idiots.

BTW, pointing out inconvenient and incontrobertible truths on GZ past is not being a :Zim Hater." It is not being a "Zim lover" either. It is simply taking facts that people will ignore to make their point.

And that is what debate is all about. Why else are you here and posting? Making fun of people whom you believe are iditos.

 

Do you have any evidence that it was pressure not to have a full investigation or is that just insecure, political mumbo jumbo you are making up.

The problem you also have is that TM willingly and without hesitation gave up said property after he claimed he was holding those items for a friend. That is not suspicious at all or indicative that he

and you also have a problem that one is innocent until proven guilty unless they are black tens wearing a hoodie, which is exactly the inference you are making here.

 

The cite was quite self-explanatory. The jewelry matched a reported theft.

 

You mean pat dollard??

 

The cite was making claims and drawing conclusions that TM was the culprit and why the burglary was never fully "investigated."

Yes, there were two police reports, one that showed the general description of the property that was stolen and the report by the school police on the said, "found" items. The problem is that there is no link between the two reports that show that TM was the person who attempted the bulgary, nor was this information that GZ knew this is what TM was willing do do, the so called GZ x ray vision.

 

http://spectator.org/blog/54312/how-miami-school-crime-cover-policy-led-trayvon-martins-death
http://theconservativetreehouse.com...ckpack-with-stolen-jewelry-and-burglary-tool/

http://www.scribd.com/doc/135564937/Sergeant-William-Tagle-Internal-Affairs-Investigative-Report

 

So it must not have been the same jewelry since Trayvon wasn't charged for stealing it.

Was the jewelry given to the person who reported it as stolen?

 

There is still no evidence os some "cover up" because everything you are citing is opinion, not facts.

 

I was about to say the same thing. Everything they post is based on opinion, no actual facts.

 

None of your questions matter. What was the issue that Trayvon could not give up where he got the stuff? Why did he let it go out of his custody? Is that what his friend would have wanted? I mean I understand some have no street smarts at all, but why you give Trayvon these huge passes is beyond me.

 

Do you have a link ?

Or are you making up stuff like you accuse others of doing?

 

No, molesting your cousin for ten years well into your late teens ,bragging on your social media about having people go to jail for your crimes and talking about assaulting because you perceive them as thieves is definitely a sign of future trouble.

 

You're posting from the Conservative Outhouse? LOL

You would be better off posting from World Nut Daily or the Moonie Times.

 

Yeah it's kinda difficult to ambush someone if you're concentrating on a phone call.

Furthermore if you want to ambush someone it would be better to be as quiet as possible otherwise you would alter the person you're trying to sneak up on and that's impossible if Trayvon were on the phone with Rachael.

 

Wait, what? For months, you've been repeatedly implying that Martin was a jewel thief -- among other things.

 

You're quoting a blog as your objective source?

 

They believe what they want to believe when it fits their agenda.

 

LOL.

Wouldn't an undercover police officer identifying himself defeat the point of being undercover?

Let's see. It was ok for George to assault someone because that someone was beating up a friend but Trayvon should have just sucked it up and allowed George to do whatever he wanted to him just because......

You people live in a very twisted world.

 

Which criminal charges, if any, were Martin charged with?

 

Isn't it the job of Law Enforcement to find out where it came from if it was stolen.

Where is the jewelry at now?

 

Officer , I got the jewerly from a friend ... But I can't tell you his name because it's a secret ! Shhhhhh !

 

I tracked down the watch on the list.. You can buy it on Ebay for $2.99.

 

Awesome ! Thanks for sharing !

 

yep the undercover cop that was hassling George's buddy who was allowing underage kids to drink at his bar deserved to get assaulted by George because they didn't identify themselves but George didn't deserve to get assaulted because he didn't identify himself to Trayvon. This is how the twisted George defenders think.

 

Ok kid since you won't tell me your friend's name I won't arrest you with having stolen jewelry. It will just be our little secret.