Johns Hopkins is a university/hospital (one of the leading ones in the country) not a person. If you don't know that then why should we trust you to know what is best to fight COVID?
Becaus I am objectively correct and islets agreed upon by every medical personell that exists lol. but hey, don’t Live healthily. That’s on you.
The COVID jab rejecters are not at all religious in their beliefs about the COVID jabs. You seem to not even know what religion is... In fact, it is Branch Covidians who are religious in their beliefs, denying science, logic, math, and engineering when claiming that "masks work against viruses"... when claiming that "masks don't protect YOU, they protect OTHERS", "COVID jabs prevent infection", and a plethora of other complete nonsense.
You've already been shown science and have denied it in favor of your Church of COVID beliefs. Church of COVID terminology... If you wished to be honest about the people of whom you speak, then you would instead be saying something along the lines of "anti COVID jabbers" or even at least "anti COVID vaxxers"... but nope, you wish to dishonestly label anyone who rejects the COVID jab in particular as someone who rejects the usage of any and all vaccines. Projection. Projection. Define 'science' for the forum. I bet you can't.
Correct. Leading at what? Correct. Because knowledge of the names of universities and hospitals is irrelevant to knowledge of immunology/virology.
How are the COVID jabs doing for Rochelle Walensky? She's supposedly "up to date" on her jabs, right?? How many times has she supposedly had COVID now?? She's up to at least 2 times per my count... I haven't had any COVID jabs, and I haven't had COVID any amount of times.
Helps in what way? Boosted, vaxed, etc folks are still both infected, suffer symptoms, and die. They also continue to spread the virus. Do you dispute any of this?
I have not been shown any science. You’ve posted links to websites that make claims but none of them actually use any science. Science: The study of the world around us by building our knowledge by means of testable explanations and predictions.
Seems that's what he thought, but the knowledge of university/hospital names is irrelevant here. He's correct about what he's saying.
You have too. You must have me confused with somebody else. I don't post links to websites. You're not completely off base, but you're still missing the heart of what makes science what it is. Science is best described as a set of falsifiable models that predict nature, and more specifically, those "models that predict nature" directly stem from falsifiable theories that continue to survive null hypothesis testing (both internally and externally). Those falsifiable theories can subsequently be formalized into laws (usually via mathematics), such as the laws of thermodynamics.
Hey Democrats! 'Get your vaccination and your booster shots' -- as often as you can. But wait for a day or two so I can load up with PFE and MRNA.