[a1] is a positive polarity element [b1] is a negative polarity element [a1] cannot exist or be created without [b1] and [b1] can not exist or be created without [a1] , without simultaneously occupying the same point of space. Sorry ......
The God parameter is not subject to dynamic force indicators (AB + 1c) going by the cryoporometry method of measuring porosity. Though ill defined and never empirically tested, the Wheeler-DeWitt equation has nevertheless had a powerful influence on fundamental theological entities.
There is no force indicators in my matrix, matrices a and b are the same matrix. The arrows are just representing in the schematic that a and b occupy [0] when manifesting in the same point at the same time.
Ok, I will just have to get even smarter Title - Quantum N-field theory . Author - S.P. Leese Abstract - This paper is a theory of an energy Matrix, an energy matrix is used to describe the primary source of energy for a system. This paper is intended to show how the energy of the Universe is formed and powers the Universe. . Showing that this formation of energy is a construct of two parts. Neither part of the process having the mechanics to retain form, without the co-existence of their opposite sign. A co-existence Matrix that is governed by simultaneous manifestations at the same geometrical point . A co-existence that also explains and answers the mechanics of the gravity process and contests the present atomic model by creating a paradox. Proof's given in the form of three matrices and the corresponding equations. Introduction. The aim of this paper is to show ostensible content and a paradox of present information. Things that are ostensible are extremely difficult to show , things that appear to be true to most people will take some serious convincing the information is otherwise. In showing the ostensible content, I hope to also show gravity mechanism by the ''truer'' content I provide. The ''truer'' content having no ostensible, appearing to be true, because it is true and of axiom values. Main text Let us begin and for the purposes of this discussion, be clear in our minds what I mean by a Matrix. For the purpose of understanding, I define a Matrix as an invisible box that has X,Y and Z dimensions. Within the 3-dimensional invisible box is a 3 dimensional array of coordinate values and/or elements. In my presentation I will present three individual 1*1*1 matrices labelled a,b and c. Within matrices a and b will be two individual integer elements i and j , let a = i and let b = j. In matrix c there will be merged integer elements i and j, let c = a + b = ci,j. Last but not least, let i = positive polarity and let j = negative polarity . My first question is , can i exist in a single matrix a? Now quite clearly all the coordinate points of Matrix a, would be repulsive points to all other points of the same matrix a. By the laws of Physics and Coulomb's laws , matrix ashould always be in a state of expansion. Matrix a would have no strong nuclear force or gravity. All the force would be ''centrifugal'' (outwards from a central point) , leaving a central void. Which brings me to my first equation and diagram: a + (-i) = 0
When you do reach that smarter level....perhaps you will understand sarcasm and inaccurately displayed mathematics terminology.
Oh I understand, that is why I have improved my maths and changed it to your language, I know the above is correct because I have Wiki and I am mimicking it..
The depths of the ineptitude you display in both basic human interaction and mathematics is somewhat staggering in its pity induction.
Ha ha. Your human interaction here seems to be a very poor example to set for the fellow as evidenced by your clever post above. ha ha. So you must be better in math, but cannot and should not ever give lessons in basic human interaction. ha ha
I did not know that about dna , but yes, in the atomic model we have electrons and protons, one cannot exist or retain form without the other.
Any "NASA people" (whatever that means) will avoid attempting discussion with you in the same way we do not talk about algebra with a deaf 8 month old. They cannot understand the child and it does not understand what you say either. You can hear it cry and know it is hungry but no one really wants to change the diaper...the stench is very unpleasant.
How interesting, did you know smart people do not have to resort to violence or insults to prove themselves smarter than the next person? a + (-a) = 0 b + (-b) = 0 a + b = 1 Like it or not NASA boy!
I will just just keep improving Title - Quantum N-field theory . Author - S.P. Leese Abstract - This paper is a theory of a R³ real coordinate space energy Matrix, an energy matrix used to describe the primary source of energy for a system. This paper is intended to show how the energy of the Universe is formed and powers the Universe. . Showing that this formation of energy is a construct of two parts. Neither part of the process having the mechanics to retain form without the co-existence of their opposite sign. A co-existence Matrix that is governed by simultaneous manifestations at the same geometrical point . A co-existence that also explains and answers the mechanics of the gravity process returning the conclusion of that neutral is attracted to neutral . This paper also contests the present atomic model by creating a paradox(s). Proof's given in the form of three matrices with the corresponding equations. Introduction. The aim of this paper is to show ostensible content and a paradox of present information. Things that are ostensible are extremely difficult to show , things that appear to be true to most people will take some serious convincing the information is otherwise. In showing the ostensible content, I hope to also show gravity mechanism by the ''truer'' content I provide. The ''truer'' content having no ostensible, appearing to be true, because it is true and of axiom values. Main text Let us begin and for the purposes of this discussion, be clear in our minds what I mean by a R³ real coordinate space Matrix. For the purpose of understanding, I define the Matrix as a real volume of space that has X,Y and Z dimensions. Within the 3-dimensional defined boundary is a 3 dimensional array of coordinate values and/or elements. In my presentation I will present three individual 1*1*1 matrices labelled a,b and c. Within matrix a and bwill be two individual integer elements i and j , let a = i and let b = j. In matrix c there will be merged elements i and j, let c = a + b = ci,j. Last but not least let i = postive polarity and let j = negative polarity . My first question is , can i exist in a single matrix a? Now quite clearly all the coordinate points of Matrix a, would be repulsive points to all other points of the same Matrix a. By the laws of Physics and Coulomb's laws , Matrix a should always be in a state of expansion. Matrix a would have no strong nuclear force or gravity. All the force would be ''centrifugal'' (outwards from a central point) , leaving a central void. Which brings me to my first equation : a = {i} i = 1 a + (-i) = 0 Now ladies and gentlemen, the above equation quite clearly shows that Matrix a, cannot retain form and will ''disperse'' directly proportionally to the inverse on any attempt to create the Matrix. Thus creating a Paradox of the existence of a Proton as presented in the present model. How can a Proton Matrix exist when all the points of the Matrix would be likewise in polarity throughout the Matrix? This leads us to our next equation and a look at Matrix b, one must assume a ⇔ b . b = [j] j = 1 b + (-j) = 0 Now ladies and gentlemen, the above equation quite clearly shows that Matrix b, also cannot retain form and will ''disperse'' directly proportionally to the inverse. Therefore any attempt to create matrix b, will also result in failure. This creating our second Paradox, how can an electron Matrix exist when all the points of the Matrix are likewise in polarity throughout the matrix? Let us now enter Matrix c into the discussion and the following equation (a+b) = c (i + j) = 1 Now ladies and gentlemen you may already 'see' an error in my equation, an ''error'' that is intentional that will allow me to explain. I already stated that i = 1 and j = 1, so the summation of i + j should equal 2 and not (i + j ) = 1 that I previosly stated. However this is a special case where i = 0.5i,j and j = 0.5 i,j therefore (a + b ) = (i + j) = (1+1) = (0.5 + 0.5)=(ci,j)=1 Now ladies and gentlemen, Matrix c can be created and does retain form because opposites attract, this allows the Matrix to have Physicality that Paradox's the existing atomic model.
And we wonder how " experts" and " scientists" end up on TV after publishing some non vetted, non reviewed by peers garbage coughs I mean research... then being paraded before us to prove whatever flavor of crap leftists want us to eat that week. Cute thread I enjoyed it.
Now then NASA boys and world, stop being so bloody arrogant when I have the awaited answer to gravity mechanics. The forces involved in my merged i,j ''matrix'' i →F ← j j→F←i i←F→i j←F→J Explain [i,j]→g←[i,j] [i,j] ←F→[i,j] pushes back G= (i,j)(i,j)/r²
I thought an apple dropped on some guys head a while back and that hashed out gravity mechanics and acceleration. Put your talents to something more noteworthy. Like.. Speed I want my children or at least my grandchildren to have an opportunity to get off this rock before we blow it up. But we need to be able to move faster. Alot faster.
Lol, an apple falls to the ground and the force that causes this, ''they'' call gravity. The quantum mechanics ''behind'' the process ''they'' do not know or understand. I understand gravity at a Quantum level and have and can explain the process and mechanics. It's a ''biggy''...of unanswered quantum mechanics
