Going into the military today means you won't be fighting for the US

You will be fighting for our destroyers instead. But you don't understand that, cuz you still think you live in the US.

Our military is under the military industrial complex which comes from the AAE, which includes the powers our founding fathers fought at our birth.

They basically got us hard in 1913, the rape, abuse and destruction of the US has continued never ending from that point.

 

That is exactly how I feel also. didn't have to read your thread, just the title is enough.

 

Basicaly when you join them you are a reserved fighter for special interests who are AGAINST the American society, since the society are not millionaires.

 

Well its a bit more than that, but yeah. Our government hasn't been training our military to be used against the people and making deals for foreign troops outside of congress to be used against we the people, for nothing.

They have a plan, and its not good for we the people.

 

If it's a secret, how do you know about it?

 

This comes from the guy who is so glued to his computer you probably don't even leave the house, or served/sacrificed anything in your life.

 

Because they do write about it and they do brag about it and boast about it.

But since the MSM doesn't repeat repeat repeat it, the people don't know about it. They know that the MSM keeps in front of them. Thats the job of the controlled media to hold the minds of the masses, thats why these power bought the controlling media of the USA in 1915 and have been taking us to "their wars" ever since.

 

How sweet

Well can you tell me why we are in all these wars? We protect the borders of other nations, protect the opium, sack the oil for the bankers plans, while our homeland security abuses the citizens, government leaves the borders open and arms drug gangs who kill Americans, and then the government wants to blame the second Amendment.

Never mind, you just go fight for freedom, while its taken away at home.

 

He does seem to be the shut in type, probably on disability income. The thing is, I actually like Ron Paul, but many of his followers, including the OP, make him look nuts. Some of these radical libertarians are taking on a CODE PINK soldier hating stench. They rail on and on about the "military industrial complex." Those who possess the ability to think understand that the private sector has given us a military second to none in the world. I'm very grateful for their collusion.

 

I'm okay with deposing Saddam and the Taliban, but I personally am all for becoming somewhat isolationist and pulling our troops back to the US to protect our borders.

The scandals of the ATF are in no way connected to the military. The scandals of the federal government should not be thrown at the military.

 

It's one thing to have a "military second to none in the world" and quite another to misuse it as we have been doing for the last 65 years.

We have not used our military power for any legitimate purpose since the last shot of WWII. But we have all paid for this misuse.

Instead of a viable economy and universal health care we put our youth and treasure into a killing machine for the benefit of the corporate owners, foreign and domestic.

What would the world look like if we had never invaded Korea, Vietnam, the MidEast, panama, Iraq, etc.

 

When I'm talking about the military industrial complex, I'm talking about the doctrine coming from the *******ocracy that because private businesses are involved in developing weapons and vehicles for the military, they are always pushing for war behind the scene so they can make more money. It's absolutely absurd...but then again, we're talking about the whacky left here.

 

Eisenhower warned of the military industrial complex and I think he was in a position to know a little something about it.

 

OOH! Ike said it so it MUST be true!

 

I happen to have a computer at home and in my office. Imagine that.
Code Pink is a controlled opposition group, they have been very quite with Obama in office, but loud when Bush was in. The wars are still going forward and Obama is just fowarding Bush policy...which is really CFR policy, ie th AAE's designs

[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8y06NSBBRtY"]Eisenhower warns us of the military industrial complex. - YouTube[/ame]

[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DxnpujfanUM&feature=related"]JFK telling us the 911 truth - YouTube[/ame]

 

We put Saddam in power and created the Taliban, or really AAE interests did via CIA, State Dept, ISI, CFR

The BATFE is part of the military industrial complex system.

 

So it's all one giant conspiracy of them out to enslave us and the world, right?

Do tin foil hats protect you from them?

 

Thats what they want to do.
You think the super rich who own the money systems of the earth are nice people?

Author of Tragedy and Hope (tragedy is all the people who must suffer and die for the NWO, and the hope is the NEW WORLD ORDER )

Professor Quigley was a Globalist, he supported the idea NEW WORLD ORDER and wrote about it, he, unlike the elites, thought the people should know about it.

"The powers of financial capitalism had another far reaching aim, nothing less than to create a world system of financial control in private hands able to dominate the political system of each country and the economy of the world as a whole. This system was to be controlled in a feudalist fashion by the central banks of the world acting in concert, by secret agreements, arrived at in frequent private meetings and conferences. The apex of the system was the Bank for International Settlements in Basle, Switzerland, a private bank owned and controlled by the worlds' central banks which were themselves private corporations. The growth of financial capitalism made possible a centralization of world economic control and use of this power for the direct benefit of financiers and the indirect injury of all other economic groups." Tragedy and Hope: A History of The World in Our Time (Macmillan Company, 1966,) Professor Carroll Quigley of Georgetown
http://www.robodoon.com/carol_quigley.htm

 

Ron Paul is not a leftist and neither are his supporters, we are on the extreme right, much further right than supporters of the warfare state like you.

 

Stop with the friendly fire. I'm more of a Ron Paul supporter than most conservatives. But robodoon I'm exposing as a nutcase 911 truther. Way off the deep end. He supports Ron Paul, but he makes him look bad. I'm trying to tell him, "Stay off our side!"

 

I dunno, Robodoon seems pretty solid on most issues as far as I can tell, he might be a 9/11 truther but hey like the great Murray Rothbard once said ''everyone is allowed to have one very wrong opinion''.

As for the code pink soldier hatred I would say it is justified when you consider that the american military behemoth costs an average american family of a father, mother and 2 children roughly $13.000 per year. The troops are not giving americans freedom, they are taking it away by forcing americans to give them such an enormous amount of money every year, a country without economic freedom is not a free country.