Golden Shower Gate Latest: Russia Has Audio, Video Of Donald Trump’s Alleged Sex Acts

I don't think it will, but I wouldn't put it past the collective to try it to keep their power.

 

Not what i said.. Insults not needed... I said and showed we are having troop build ups near the Russian border.

Can you please try to debate something without resorting to insults?

 

That is called trying the tin foil hat on, but reserving on buying it for a few days. Just to covers one's backside.

 

No insults given.
The discussion I replied to was silly premises.
So I pointed out a silly premise that many RWers jumped on, the false flag story about aircraft carriers and ww3.
To which you chimed in on and gave some silly link to loony Rosie O'donnel talking about some silly false flag and ww3.
Which she has no say or control. So why give such a silly link?

So you come off as the story having some credibility. Which makes me think you fell for the silly premise.

 

Yes lets ignore you claiming the tin foil hat nonsense..

"Didn't realize there were so many tin foil hat wearers here" ( Your quote so yes insults)
.Lets also ignore most of my posts that had actual links to actual news stories about our troop build ups... Why debate like this? What do you gain?

I at no point did i claim "WW3" was happening.. debate truthfully.. Reply to what i say not what you think i said or what you can spin it to.

 

I think she's hot too. I probably wouldn't date her because I prefer men but if she wanted to go shopping together and talk about how to handle the health care issue I'd be for it.

 

The tin foil hat wearers believe the false flag story. If you don't believe it, it wasn't directed to you.
Then why bring up rosie o'donnel in a link? A looney tune.

 

Not directed and yet you keep replying to ME...

Are we building troop levels in Poland yes or no. You keep posting PART of my posts and I know damn well why.. You simply can not debate me.

 

I wasn't replying to you at all. You were the 1st to reply to me in this thread.

I am not discussing Poland, nor was I. I was posting about silly premises to the other poster, when you butted in.
I have no interest in debating something I wasn't even talking about.

You were just trying one to get one of your usual gotcha posts. So typical of your posts. So I can conclude you were just trolling me.
Take part of some post, irrelevant to the discussion and try to change the topic.
Now if you want to discuss the silly premises, as was being discussed. Let's go for it.

 

I have a dossier that says Barack Obama had sex with pigs with David Cameron on his trip to the UK and he said "I haven't had this much fun since my trip to Saudi Arabia" - I am not sure if it is accurate but I will let the public decide if it is true or false - I thought people have right to know.

I sent a copy to John McCain so he can give it to the FBI.

 

We do. Give us the link so we can read it.

 

BuzzFeed actually admitted that the dossier was not accurate. So, is it unethical to publish libelous disinformation if the "journalist" labels it 'libelous disinformation'?

 

They have just been flushed down the old political toilet - makes them bitter. Be patient with them

 

Read the linked story quoting Trump's own words.

Are you really saying that we should NOT believe what he, himself, says?

 

[/QUOTE]

If Trump can turn things around, I don't think people will care if he is into water sports, Rusty Ventures, or whatever else you can dream up.

 

If Trump can turn things around, I don't think people will care if he is into water sports, Rusty Ventures, or whatever else you can dream up.[/QUOTE]

The answer is in chapter 11 of his biography.

 

I've found this thread to be quite depressing, and to judge from the predominance of anti-Trump posts, it proves my theory that 'empty vessels make the most noise'. There really ought to be a minimum IQ level below which the right to vote in national elections is denied.

 

We will believe anything these days if it is something we want to believe.

 

You realize President-elect Tinkles would have lost the election had there been a minimum IQ requirement, right?

 

This from the guy who dismisses the most elementary facts of science.

 

No, but we take it seriously when it rises to the level of a national security threat, which is why the President and Trump were both briefed. It is also serious enough that the FBI obtained at least one warrant.

 

Most intelligent people judged that Hillary Clinton's allegiance to foreign money, Wall Street oligarchs and globalist corporate interests made Donald Trump the lesser of two evils. That's why Trump is being sworn in quite soon as president and not Hillary Clinton, who couldn't even properly manage her own campaign.

 

If voter IQ really mattered Sanders or Stein would have been the DP candidate.

 

With all of his skanky behavior come to light, I wonder if he will be the first president to go through a divorce while in office...

[/QUOTE]

 

We will see how it plays out then.

But I have a feeling it will remain with the common theme of "fake".