Give it up.... I'm willing to accept anything. Dismissing creationism is not science.......It seems "science" is so obsessed with proving creationism being wrong that they ignore evidence, call these artifacts anomalies....
Ok, search up the 1969-70's issues of nature magazine, which my link quoted, and see for yourself. Here's how it's supposed to work, I provide evidence, no matter where it comes from, and you debunk it.
that was done in the second post of this thread.....................http://www.politicalforum.com/showthread.php?t=442252&p=1065796925#post1065796925
I'm not reading a crackpot website to find good information. Provide the evidence and I'll look at it. The crackpot website with evidence in it amongst the crap, is not providing evidence. The problem is that you don't really understand what you are reading, based on some of the questions you've posed in other threads. You don't have the science background to really say much. Please study science for a few years, and then we can discuss.
