Hamas Embraces the Path of the Islamic State (ISIS)

Discussion in 'Middle East' started by HBendor, Dec 1, 2014.

  1. HBendor

    HBendor New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2009
    Messages:
    12,043
    Likes Received:
    60
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Now it has been confirmed that Hamas embraces the Path of ISIS.
    This has been divulged by the dozens of arrests made lately from infiltrators and Turks supposedly on vacation.


    Hamas Embraces the Path of the Islamic State (ISIS)

    Lt. Col. (ret.) Jonathan D. Halevi,
    Jerusalem Issue Briefs
    Vol. 14, No. 38 November 27, 2014
    Institute for Contemporary Affairs
    Founded jointly with the Wechsler Family Foundation
    http://jcpa.org/article/hamas-embraces-path-of-islamic-state/


    The more the Islamic State carries out its secret subversion in the
    Palestinian street, the more Hamas tends to adopt the Caliphate’s terror methods.
    -In October 2014 Palestinian security forces arrested dozens of Islamic
    State supporters, some of whom had tried to set up secret cells and carry out terror attacks. The Islamic State-inspired vehicular and stabbing attacks won widespread Palestinian support.

    -Hamas does not openly back the Islamic Caliphate. Neither Hamas nor Islamic
    Jihad, which are both dependent on Iran as a strategic ally, are free to express direct or indirect support for the Islamic State, the cardinal enemy of the regime in Tehran.
    -Hamas feels confident that Israel will refrain from attacking Hamas targets in Gaza due to the ceasefire.

    The State of the Islamic Caliphate (known as the Islamic State, IS, ISIS,
    ISIL, or Daesh), which was declared by self-appointed caliph Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, has fundamentally altered the reality of the Middle East and threatens to reshuffle the geopolitical cards, change the map of existing state borders, and undermine all the Muslim states as separate national entities.

    The goal to re-establish the caliphate led to the emergence of the global Muslim Brotherhood movement in Egypt at the end of the 1920s; of Hizb ut-Tahrir in the 1950s, whose ideological platform enshrines the vision of the caliphate and the aim of fulfilling it; and of other Islamic organizations. All of these without exception, including Hamas (the branch of the Muslim Brotherhood in “Palestine”) and the Islamic Movement in Israel, view the creation of the caliphate as a religious duty. In line with the prophecy of Muhammad the restoration of the caliphate is supposed to be
    the means to unify Muslims under the rule of Islamic law (shari’a), before proceeding to conquer Europe and impose the Muslim religion worldwide.

    The Islamic State poses a weighty challenge to other regional actors. Not only is the vision of Islam being realized in Iraq and Syria, to which Islamic tradition assigns a special importance on the way to restoring Islam to its former glory, but the Islamic State continues to entrench its rule, fearlessly defying the United States and the West while attracting thousands of Muslims from all over the world and inspiring many millions more.

    Jihadi Organizations Don’t All Support the Islamic State

    The leading Islamic organizations – the International Union of Muslim
    Scholars headed by Sheikh Yusuf al-Qaradawi, the Muslim Brotherhood, and
    Hizb ut-Tahrir – have rejected Caliph Baghdadi’s call to all Muslims to
    swear him their allegiance. In their view, the establishment of the
    caliphate did not meet the conditions Islam stipulated and hence is not
    valid. At the same time, these groups resolutely deny the legitimacy of the
    war being waged by the United States and the international and Arab
    coalition against the Islamic State.

    Thus, for example, Sheikh Qaradawi wrote on his Twitter account: “I disagree
    with the Islamic State’s ideological conception and approach; but I will
    never agree to the United States being the one to fight it.” This is because
    the Americans “are not motivated by the values of Islam, but rather by their
    own interests even if blood must be spilled.”1

    The Islamic Action Front, which is the Muslim Brotherhood’s political arm in
    Jordan, came out against the Hashemite Kingdom’s participation in the
    military coalition against the Islamic State. A statement the group issued
    on September 11, 2014 declared that the campaign against the Islamic State
    “is not our war.”2 Hizb ut-Tahrir took a similar stance when it
    unequivocally asserted that “participation in Obama’s imperialist coalition
    [against the Islamic State] is a grave crime.”3

    Implicit in the ambivalence of these organizations’ posture is the baffling
    challenge that the caliphate poses for them. On the one hand, they do not
    want to swear allegiance to the caliph, since that requires total
    subjugation to the rule of the caliphate with all this entails; on the other
    hand, they want to defend the caliphate against the international and Arab
    coalition even though they know that the continued strengthening of the
    caliphate could lead to the downfall of the existing regimes and the
    annexation of additional states under Baghdadi’s rule.

    Another very important consideration for these organizations is that the
    Islamic Caliphate exerts great influence beyond the borders of Syria and
    Iraq. In his speech proclaiming the caliphate, Baghdadi did not request the
    Islamic organizations’ backing. As caliph he sees himself as representing
    all Muslims in the world, and he calls on them directly to swear allegiance
    to him and embark on jihad. Baghdadi thereby exerts influence over the other
    Islamic organizations; he seeks recruits for the army of the caliphate and
    hopes to create branches within the Muslim states that will work to
    overthrow existing governments.

    The Islamic State and the Palestinians

    The Islamic State also exercises considerable influence in the Palestinian
    Authority of the West Bank and in Gaza, which is effectively under Hamas
    rule. When, on September 21, 2014, the caliphate’s spokesman Sheikh Abu
    Muhammad al-Adnani called on Muslims worldwide to engage in jihad against
    the infidels and kill them indiscriminately in any manner, including ramming
    them with cars and stabbing them with knives, the words resonated in the
    Palestinian camp. Over the past two months there have been many stabbing and
    vehicular attacks in sovereign Israel and in the West Bank; the most severe
    was the massacre in a Jerusalem synagogue on November 18, 2014, in which
    four rabbis and a policeman were murdered with pistols, meat cleavers, and
    knives.

    That the caliphate’s power of attraction has not gone unnoticed by senior
    Hamas figures is apparent in articles in Hamas’s daily mouthpiece Felesteen
    (felesteen.ps), published in Gaza. Dr. Yusuf Rizaka, who was minister for
    holy places in the Hamas government headed by Ismail Haniyeh and from 2007
    to 2014 served as an adviser to Haniyeh, praises the “private jihad” that
    has swept the younger generation in Jerusalem, and explains that certain
    religious commandments apply to every Muslim and that parental approval is
    not required to perform them.

    Rizaka added:

    The private jihad is a declaration of the death of the Arab regime and the
    Arab liberator [of the occupied lands] and of the rise of the Palestinian
    sphinx from the sands of the current reality in order to fight the war of
    the heroes against the enemy, the suicide warriors, and thereby to bring
    back to life the days of Yehiya Ayash [the Al-Aqsa Brigades commander who
    was behind a spate of suicide bombings], Hassan Salameh [an Al-Aqsa Brigades
    operative from Gaza who sent several suicide bombers on missions to the West
    Bank], Amar Abu Sirhan [a Palestinian terrorist who stabbed three Israelis
    to death in 1990], and [the onslaught of] the knives in Jaffa.4

    Dr. Abd al-Hamid al-Farani, a researcher at the Department of Religious and
    Wakf Affairs,5 admits in a Felesteen article on October 20, 2014 that “the
    main issue occupying the world today, including the Arabs and the Muslims,
    is the matter of the Islamic State and the ostensible danger that it poses.”
    According to him, “Its [the Islamic State’s] ostensible danger is not at all
    equal to the Zionist danger that has been looming over the heart of
    Palestine for over six decades.”6

    According to al-Farani, the Islamic State does not necessarily constitute a
    threat and the most important task is to liberate Palestine through armed
    struggle:

    Your words about the Islamic State do not interest me, since what interests
    me is greater than any organization, party, or ideological platform, and
    that is Al-Aqsa [Mosque], O the nation of Muhammad beckons to you and calls
    on you to put it at the top of your order of priorities, not in words and
    not in idle chatter, but in armies and planes.

    In a Felesteen article on October 19, 2014 Dr. Adnan Abu Amar of the Islamic
    University in Gaza7 notes that Salafi jihadist elements have been leaving
    the Hamas fold over ideological disputes and immediately joining radical
    Islamist organizations, including the Islamic State.8

    Imad Afana, a Palestinian academic in the Islamic field and native of
    Damascus,9 wrote in Felesteen on October 1, 2014, that “the Islamic State in
    Iraq and the Levant and the establishment of the caliphate is a dream that
    fires the imagination of every Muslim in the world.”10 He added:

    Today there is great readiness among Muslim young people to join other
    Islamic organizations such as Al-Nusra and the Islamic State, based on the
    prophecy and the many hadiths of the Prophet on the virtues of control of
    the Levant, the jihad warriors of the Levant and the martyrs of the Levant,
    and also the saying that the Al-Quds [Jerusalem] liberation army went forth
    from the Levant toward Jordan….

    In light of the political-security reality in Gaza, which necessitated a
    temporary ceasefire with Israel after the war, and also in the West Bank, on
    the Jordanian border, and in Lebanon, Syria, and Egypt, what is required is
    “the ongoing adjustment of the compass of the umma [Islamic nation] and its
    jihadist activity in the direction of Al-Quds and the liberation of
    Palestine.” Here, Afana finds an effective answer to Islamic State’s focus
    on Iraq and Syria, which in his view detracts from the struggle over
    Palestine.

    There are, however, unmistakable signs of the trend in favor of the Islamic
    State. In October 2014, Palestinian security forces arrested dozens of
    Islamic State supporters, some of whom had tried to set up secret cells and
    carry out terror attacks.11 The Islamic State-inspired vehicular and
    stabbing attacks won widespread Palestinian support. Immediately after the
    news emerged of the massacre at the Jerusalem synagogue, joyful celebrations
    were held throughout Gaza and in the West Bank as well; among other things
    these included the traditional practice of handing out sweets to
    passersby.12

    In Felesteen on November 20, Palestinian journalist Khaled Maali explained
    the implications of the synagogue massacre in the spirit of the Islamic
    State:

    The Al-Quds operation became known immediately to the settlers, and the
    state of trauma, terror, and fear was reflected in their faces, since the
    operation conveyed to them the following message: “You will be slaughtered
    like sheep if you stay in a land that is not yours and desecrate the Al-Aqsa
    Mosque…. All the Palestinians and the liberals in the world know that every
    settler [meaning, in this context, every Jew who lives in the Land of
    Israel] is a murderer and a thief [of land], and is not innocent.”13

    The day after the massacre, Felesteen published a cartoon showing the
    headless corpse of a young Jew under the caption: “Here is Al-Quds
    [Jerusalem].”14 Cartoons in a similar vein, lauding the stabbing and
    car-ramming attacks, appeared on social networks of the different
    Palestinian organizations. This was a continuation of the “Daes” campaign –
    a play on the Arabic word daes (trample) and the Arabic acronym for Islamic
    State, Daesh. This “Run over the Jew” theme has also been expressed in songs
    and videos that extol the Palestinian murderers.


    For example, a new and well-crafted video, “Revolution of Knives” by Ismail
    Nasser Farahat of Gaza, who apparently lives in Turkey and works for Life
    Lens for Media Productions, calls on Palestinians to murder Israeli soldiers
    daily.15 The video encourages Palestinians to overcome all hindrances and
    prepare the weapons needed for bloody attacks. At the start of the clip a
    masked Palestinian appears who is diligently preparing a knife. He whets it
    well with a whetting machine and, finishing his task in the workshop,
    flaunts it proudly. A message in Arabic appears: “Rise and avenge, prepare
    the weapon for revenge, slaughter the Jewish soldier-apes, and slaughter
    them every day anew, since you are death, you are destruction and you are
    the martyr.”

    Hamas Embraces the Path of the Islamic State (ISIS)
    Screenshot from
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=HMm62qtA13c

    After that the masked Palestinian is shown attacking an Israeli soldier from
    behind and stabbing him to death. The soldier’s corpse is left lying on the
    ground in a large pool of blood.

    The masked Palestinian brandishes the murder weapon and speaks to the
    camera, but his voice is not heard. Instead the message he wants to express
    is conveyed in Arabic and in Hebrew (with errors in spelling and syntax):
    “Leave our land we are heaven’s promise to you and we will destroy you,
    leave our land, we are the history here, and we are the emissaries of hell
    to you sons of Zion.”

    Hamas does not openly back the Islamic Caliphate, and its top officials only
    rarely refer to it officially. In a press conference in Tunisia on September
    13, 2014, Hamas leader Khaled Mashal was asked about the Israeli claim that
    Hamas is similar to the Islamic State. He replied:

    The Islamic struggle movement Hamas presented an example to the region with
    its call from the beginning for moderation and the middle path in the
    interpretation of Islam, for dialogue, for a rational approach and for
    meeting an idea with an idea and an opinion with an opinion…. Hamas gave the
    region an example of political moderation, of openness to the regional and
    international spheres along with adherence to the national principles of the
    Palestinian people.16

    Here Mashal exercised great caution not to directly criticize the Islamic
    State. He did not mention it at all but instead explained the approach of
    Hamas, indicating that its strategy leads to achievements without
    sacrificing its ideological platform.

    Hamas Navigates Between the Islamic State and Its Patron, Iran

    Neither Hamas nor Islamic Jihad, both of which are dependent on Iran as a
    strategic ally, is free to express direct or indirect support for the
    Islamic State, the cardinal enemy of the regime in Tehran. The references to
    the Islamic State that issue from Iran, including from Supreme Leader Ali
    Khamenei himself,17 are unequivocal and set clear red lines for the
    Palestinian organizations. The assistant to the foreign minister for Arab
    and African affairs, Hossein Amir Abdel-Lahian, said in this context that if
    the Islamic State was really a defender of the Sunnis, it would back Hamas
    and the other Palestinian struggle organizations; in other words, the
    Islamic State is an enemy of the Sunni world and not only of the Shiite
    world.18 On October 16, 2014, the leader of Islamic Jihad, Ramadan Salah,
    arrived for a visit to Tehran that, according to the official announcement,
    was intended to discuss among other things the danger the Islamic State
    constitutes, including the diversion of the struggle from Palestine to other
    arenas.19

    Hamas is committed at present to the temporary ceasefire in Gaza. But this
    period of reduced terror from Gaza, even as preparations for the next round
    proceed, has left a vacuum. The Islamic State has entered this vacuum in a
    jihadist surge as it achieves victories on the battlefield, fights the West
    without trepidation, enforces Islamic law, and promises to liberate
    Palestine after overthrowing the “treasonous” Arab regimes in Saudi Arabia
    and Jordan.

    In the face of this challenge, which threatens to erode Hamas’s popular
    support and has already led Hamas operatives to leave the organization for
    the Islamic State, Hamas is trying to open a front with Israel in the West
    Bank and Jerusalem or at least ride the wave of “private jihad” that has
    swept away many. This approach is consistent with Hamas’ strategic aim of
    dismantling the Palestinian Authority’s rule in the West Bank, taking over
    the Palestinian government, and making the West Bank a base for the next
    terror assault on Israel – to be waged from a position vastly superior to
    Gaza.

    Thus Hamas has adopted the Islamic State’s terror methods without crediting
    the source of the inspiration. The more the tacit competition with the
    Islamic State over the Palestinian street intensifies, the more Hamas is
    likely to escalate these methods. In doing so, while also making repeated
    proclamations of a third Intifada, Hamas wants to be seen as persisting in
    the jihad against Israel, and it feels confident that because of the
    ceasefire Israel will refrain from attacking Hamas targets in Gaza in
    response to terror attacks in the West Bank, or to attacks that originate in
    the West Bank but occur in Israeli territory.

    * * *

    Notes

    1 http://assafir.com/Article/372011/Archive

    2
    http://www.allofjo.net/index.php?page=article&id=77222#sthash.Pu29BCnK.dpuf

    3 http://www.pal-tahrir.info/hizb-publications/7489-2014-09-11-21-39-40.html

    4
    https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=539320639533467&id=173493772782824

    5 www.quranradiofm.com/print.aspx?id=145&q=1

    6
    http://felesteen.ps/details/news/125644/الأقصى-أم-داعش.html

    7 http://adnanabuamer.com/page.php?id=9#.VHMZHIvF_gc

    8
    http://felesteen.ps/details/news/125619/بماذا-تختلف-حماس-عن-تنظيم-الدولة.html

    9 http://www.alnoor.se/author.asp?id=1970

    10
    http://felesteen.ps/details/news/124625/مستقبل-المقاومة-الفلسطينية-بعد-الحرب-الكونية-على-داعش.html

    11 http://fpnp.net/site/news/36958

    12 http://www.alfajertv.com/news/3386178.html

    13
    http://felesteen.ps/details/news/127669/انعكاسات-عملية-القدس.html

    14 http://felesteen.ps/nd/releases//2014/112014/19/index.html?d=1416831942

    15 https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=HMm62qtA13c

    16
    http://www.assabah.com.tn/article/8...ردنا-على-«داعش»-وناتنياهو-وحلفائهما-في-أمريكا

    17
    http://www.tahaaluf.com/خامنئي-غزة-تمكنت-من-تركيع-اسرائيل-و-ال/

    18 http://www.faceiraq.com/inews.php?id=2888529

    19 http://www.elnnews.com/archives/924

    =====================


    About Lt. Col. (ret.) Jonathan D. Halevi

    Lt. Col. (ret.) Jonathan D. Halevi is a senior researcher of the Middle East
    and radical Islam at the Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs. He is a
    co-founder of the Orient Research Group Ltd.
    ________________________________________
    IMRA - Independent Media Review and Analysis
     

Share This Page