Hawaii Man Who Supports Having Sex With Children Blocked From Becoming Teacher

http://christiannews.net/2016/01/02...-with-children-blocked-from-becoming-teacher/

HYPERLINK has full story

snip

HONOLULU, Hawaii — A federal appeals court has ruled that it was not unlawful for a university to deny a teaching certificate to a man who aspired to be a high school teacher after he expressed views in support of adults having sexual relations with children......................


“Personally, I think that online child predation should be legal, and find it ridiculous that one could be arrested for comments they make on the Internet,” he wrote in one school paper in 2010. “I even think that real-life child predation should be legal, provided that the child is consensual. Basically from my point of view, the age of consent should be either 0, or whatever age a child is when puberty begins.”................

Oyama’s attorney, Eric Seitz, told reporters that he found the ruling to be wrongful since Oyama had not acted on any of this beliefs.

“To me, it is outrageous for expressions of opinions — however misguided — in a classroom discussion that a student can be essentially kicked out of his educational program,” he said.

end snip

forget how despicable you might find this guy's opinion to be, it is his opinion.

If they continue, this case will make it to the SCOTUS because how can the SCOTUS deem that one deviant sexual lifestyle (gay-sex) is OK and not provide the same affirmative action to every other deviant sexual behavior? The slippery slope has been created and this guy is an example of the hypocrisy of progressives.

If we can, without ay medical proof whatsoever, deem that one is "born wanting gay sex" then we must do the same for pedophilia, necrophilia et al

>>>MOD EDIT Flamebait Removed<<<

 

He sounds handsome. Does anybody have his number?

 

Sexual relations with minors is unlawful; consensual sexual relations between two consenting adults is beautiful, legal, and nice regardless if the two are of the same gender.

 

This guy should be executed - that is my decision and it is not reversible.

 

you wish to kill him simply for how he was born?

 

So a guy who thinks it's okay to have a relationship with children wants to get a job where he can deal with children all day. What could possibly go wrong?

You know, I guess it never occurred to me that people might see teaching as a way to pick up chicks. I always thought we went into it because it was a calling - it sure isn't for the money.

Hey, what was his name again? Woody Allen? R. Kelly? Tyga?

 

Ok, the guy likes what he likes, just like I can't stand girls with silicone, tattoos and huge butts. But this guy should never be put near children. Would anyone want to give a gun to a guy who believes it's ok to shoot people? Why take chances?

 

I saw that it was you writing this post and I immediately wondered when you would tie this back to gay people.

When all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail. In your case, when all you have is a pathological obsession with gay sex, everything looks like two men furiously going at it.

If you look at two people of the same sex having a relationship and then someone raping a child and think "Wow, these are really similar", you should be forced to have an icepick lobotomy in order to keep society safe, because you may well confuse a candle with a flamethrower and burn down someone's house.

????

There's actually evidence backing the idea that pedophilia is an acquired paraphilia rather than a sexual orientation.

I have chosen to redact every one of the many responses I've typed up for this, because every single one of them was an insult that even I thought was going too far.

 

The Court ruled that he must be given the "Teaching Certificate" he has earned -- NOT (1) that a school must hire him or (2) that his views are acceptable in deceit society &#8230;

He's a pedophile (which is not a crime), but no one is obligated to allow him access to children &#8230;

 

Uh,Good?

 

Homosexual sex was illegal not too long ago.

That is until it was deemed legal.

 

What does this story have to do with homosexuality?

 

Just so, also, "inter racial" sex and "unmarried" sex &#8230; What's your point &#8230; ??

 

the man supports a deviant sexual lifestyle. Had this story been about another deviant sexual lifestyle, for example, the homosexual lifestyle, we would have seen the LGBTQRSTUVWXYZ community all up in arms. What's good for one deviant sexual lifestyle MUST be good for all the rest.

It's not good, moral people who insisted on deeming the homosexual lifestyle as being "normal and acceptable"

But, once you grant special accords to one, you must for all.

 

I believe pedophiles are born that way and there's no cure for it.....

Sec, the diff b/t a gay couple is they're 2 consenting adults, whereas this pervert thinks sex w/a underage children should be permitted as long as the child agrees.....

Wonder if he's a member of NAMBLA?......probably.

 

"f'n" &#8230; ??? Is that "fun" &#8230; ??? &#8230; or "fan" &#8230; ??? &#8230; or "fin" &#8230; ???
Please advise &#8230;
(I certainly do not want to miss even one teeny tiny "bit" of your erudite wisdom and deep knowledge &#8230

 

So you support legalizing the rape of children? Is that an accurate summary of the argument you are putting forth?

- - - Updated - - -

So child rape should be legal according to your argument?

 

Once again, what does this story have to do with homosexuality? Your obvious obsession with gay sex doesn't really have any relevance here.

 

I have never once claimed I was born homosexual. Try again
If they harm another person - especially a child - they should be punished.
Repeat offenders should be executed or have their citizenship revoked.

 

Stuart, there have been some cases where a pediatrician was a pediatrician b/c ..... well, take a wild guess. Not many cases like this, I don't think..... I hope to God NOT!

There was one case - don't remember name or state - but the pediatrician told the mother she could wait in the waiting room while he examined her child, so the mothers did. He was eventually caught and the sexual abuse/child pron that was discovered was ....you can image.

I was stunned when I read about the mothers being told to wait in the waiting room while he examined her toddler & some older and DID IT. There's NO WAY IN HELL I would have agreed to that and not b/c I suspected him of doing stuff to my child, but the fact that my child wanted me w/her/him and I would have been there......

You never know about people........

 

Id like to help this guy find his way into a volcano. You know, for educational purposes of course.

Me -" hey man check it out, you know what little kids think is totally awesome? "

Pedo Bear- " what? tell me I must know. Is it a van with lots of candy in it?"

Me- " No dude, a volcano. Kids love volcano's"

Pedo Bear - " Holy crap you are right, and what a coincidence that we are on a volcano"

Me- " Yup, and you know what would be real cool? "

Pedo Bear- " What what what? What will make little timmy like me and sit on my lap ?"

Me- "If you went down in there and got some actual lava, timmy would love it"

Pedo Bear- " Ok well how do I do that ?"

Me- " Well here let me help you. Take this rope and...... UhhhUUUhhhhhAtchuuuuuu" * Violent sneeze causes me to accidentally throw a devastatingly accurate right hook to the temple, knocking Pedo Bear out and launching him into the volcano*

Me- "Dang it, my allergies. Muh bad dude , ill send timmy your regards"

 

we're dealing with unprovable claims

born homosexual
born pedophile


why should only one of those deviant lifestyles be given special accords?

The guy in the story has not touched a little kid but is being punished for his opinion.

Look, you're either all in for deviant sexual lifestyles or all out

You can't be a little bit pregnant

 

the guy in the story has not molested a child

this isn't about our personal opinion of pedophiles. It's about the hypocrisy by you and others where one deviant sexual lifestyle is OK yet the other isn't

the argument is that homosexuals are "born that way". Well, isn't that then also true for pedophiles? Then why punish someone for how they were born?

You guys own this slippery slope.

 

So you do support the legalization of raping children?

 

I am not arguing homosexuals are born that way.
In one of your instances someone is harmed, in another there is consent. Its alarming that you see no differance in a mutual consented relationship and child rape. Scary actually... Are you the teacher in the article?