http://www.independent.co.uk/news/w...rigged-election-misconduct-iowa-a7830221.html This is one of a VERY few cases of actual voter fraud... It gets dealt with severely (and rightfully so). The so-called president has done tremendous harm by besmirching our elections, claiming massive voter fraud with zero evidence.
When voter fraud is truly revealed you and the rest of your communist libs will deny it just like every other fact you have denied.
We're all sure voter fraud exists. The question is whether it exists on the scale that Trump claims it does. If not, then it isn't worth the extra scrutiny. I imagine incidents of voter fraud are particularly rare, especially among illegal immigrants who probably wouldn't want to risk getting caught and deported just to vote illegally.
It doesn't take "massive fraud" to sway elections. Why are you willing to allow even the possibilty when there is a very effective way to help insure it does not occur?
What does what Trump says have to do with the thousandsof elections that are held across the country every year do you voter fraud is knly about the state elections for presidential electors? There are lots of small elsdtions with close results where just a few fraudulent votes could sway the election. Heck speaking of presidential elections just over 500 fraudulent votes could have change the 2000 race. So stop with the canard it has to be massive to count or affeft elections in this country.
Where did I say it has to be a massive count to affect elections? I said that if it doesn't exist on the scale Trump says it does (which by the way it doesn't) then it isn't worth investigating. That doesn't mean that some elections here and there won't be swayed by illegal voting. Rather, the cost of enforcement outweighs the benefit.
Oh yes. It will cost only $5 to enforce voter fraud in the US. I wonder what your basis is for that totally not made up estimate. And just out of curiosity, does the Russian interference also raise concerns of the sovereignty of our nation?
Despite devoting massive resources to solve the worst crime humans inflict upon each other, murder carries a 60% clearance rate. We're supposed to believe democratic process fraud investigators uncover and solve virtually every case.
A voter ID card. And of course it would. There is an investigation into that which everyone is complying with. Out of curiosity, don't you think that the investigation into voter fraud should be as well, if for no other reason to vindicate your beliefs or put a stop to what you accept threatens the democratic process?
Here's just a small list of voter fraud that was detected. A SAMPLING OF ELECTION FRAUD CASES FROM ACROSS THE COUNTRY The United States has a long and unfortunate history of election fraud. The Heritage Foundation is providing a list of election fraud cases from across the country, broken down by state, where individuals were either convicted of vote fraud, or where a judge overturned the results of an election. This is not an exhaustive list but simply a sampling that demonstrates the many different ways in which fraud is committed. Preventing, deterring, and prosecuting such fraud is essential to protecting the integrity of our voting process. 462 cases 742 criminal convictions It's all here -> https://thf_media.s3.amazonaws.com/2015/pdf/VoterFraudCases-8-7-15-Merged.pdf
Make sure you remember this statement when more info emerges in public on how deep the Russian 2016 election rigging actually went.
Fact: little government conservatives love to ignore the fact that they promote massive, elitist, statist government control over our lives in very peculiar ways. One is in the bedroom, another is at the ballot box and another is in the sanctity of our homes medicating ourselves how we choose. That, sir, is fact.
Non-sequiter. Try again It doesn't take "massive fraud" to sway elections. Why are you willing to allow even the possibilty when there is a very effective way to help insure it does not occur?
What cost but interesting to see your shift from it doesn't happen ti not worth the cost and that local and state eldctions don't really matter. The whole "massive" thing is a strawman as noted just over 500 fraudulent votes could have changed the entire results in 2000. There is not rational justificate to not have voter ID when registering and when casting the vite.
Ah getting your propaganda from UK sources now, what's next, Sin Chew Daily? I especially like the comment section I guess the poop is the same everywhere LMAO
Funny post seeing as you libs like to make everything mandatory or banned but here you go blaming the right for your style.
I believe it is much worse than many think and would bet big money it isn't the Trump and Russia dog and pony BS, it is illegals and I have seen many videos of voting staff committing fraud.
This is a thread specifically about voter fraud being truly revealed...and it is made by a liberal...
The reason is because the "fix" is worse than the problem. Strict Voter ID laws are associated with a roughly 2% drop in voter turnout. Voter Fraud itself amounts to something around 0.00002% of the votes cast.
