Here's The Proof

https://www.google.com/search?q=Cat...CAAYYBiAGtHZIBBDQ0LjWYAQCgAQE&sclient=gws-wiz

 

LOL I already did. The chant is “we’re here, we’re queer, we’re NOT to call your children”

 

So again, what specific threat? What specific threat of endangerment are they guilty of?

 

I'm not gonna click that random google link. Who knows whats in it and what dark places on the internet that will lead me to. if you have something to say man then JUST SAY IT

 

Accept what? What is the specific threat of endangerment?

 

That doesn’t show support for gay rights or equal treatment — it is a self assessment on morals. I don’t think being a conservative is moral but I also don’t think they should lose rights or be a banned topic.

Even your own poll shows the vast majority of the US population support gay rights.

You think the richest man in the US is the counter elite?

ROFL — it isn’t that he is counter elite (he is the definition of ‘elite’) it’s that you agree with him.

I couldn’t give a damn what people think as moral which is highly subjective as long as they support equal rights and equal treatment in the eyes of the law.

 

QUOTE="Nwolfe35, post: 1074294242, member: 64166"]https://www.google.com/search?q=Cat...CAAYYBiAGtHZIBBDQ0LjWYAQCgAQE&sclient=gws-wiz

That's is one loooong link...

Let me guess where else it goes before it gets to "Catholics introduce children to the gospel". Looks like Eastern Europe.

 

I'm not playing this lame little game. If you don't think "WE'RE COMING FOR YOUR CHILDREN" is threatening then its now a matter of opinion and no point in arguing about it. I think its very telling you won't test out your own opinion though. I'd like to see you go to the mall, find a couple where the boyfriend looks like THE ROCK and say "i'm coming for your woman". again, please report your findings here. Thank you

 

You’re the one playing games as you can’t even explain what the specific threat of endangerment is. What is the specific threat of endangerment they are guilty of? Should be easy for you to explain, right?

 

More word games. News flash! I SEE THROUGH IT.
Do you really wanna play this silly little game?
Even saying "watch your back" to someone is a threat but it could mean them just saying "be careful"
your lack of acknowledgment of it being threatening just further cements the OP
Please, keep it coming. Its good, really good

 

Hahahahaha...why are you struggling to provide what the specific threat of endangerment is? The fact that you can't proves there was no specific threat of endangerment.

 

No struggles. its right IN THE CHANT. you just deny it is. Like I said, circular argument. If you want to deny facts there isn't anything I can do about it. Have a blessed day sir!

 

I haven't denied anything as you haven't provided an answer to my question. If it's in the chant then you should be able to explain the specific threat of endangerment....yet you haven't been able to do so. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

 

I provided the Twitter video and posted to you the actual words yet you are still posting the lies

 

It is trolling — it also doesn’t necessarily mean sexually, I took it initially as pushing tolerance but I can understand the leap. It doesn’t help, I just don’t think it hurts either.

People that have been calling them groomers will continue to do so and everyone else will continue to say this isn’t grooming.

As to what rights a being threatened, to which group? Several states are trying to ban anatomically correct (post surgical) trans people from went wrong bathrooms. Some are going as far to push laws that could potentially see them arrested if they are in public and a child sees them (TN law is an example)

Medical and insurance denials based on morals is another major issue. Adoption. General representation.

 

Remind us again why you think that a chant from maybe a dozen people somehow represents "the left." Still waiting on that one.

 

Why? so you can misquote me like you did in the other thread and accuse me of transphobia for the 100th time? NO THANKS. The OP has proven his point. My input isn't really needed at this point. The lefts grooming agenda is now PROVEN

 

And now I can once again quote you claiming that these dozen or so people represent "the left." You claim it would be "misquoting" you to say so . . . but you explicitly state it in your last sentence.

 

So they do what they are being criticized for? Every action either helps or hurts. This one hurts.

Im not sure I oppose laws on showing ones genitals to children.

Medical insurance should not force the entire group to pay for unnecessary cosmetic surgery. I have no issue with with surgery as long as the patient is an adult and can afford to pay for it.

Adoption is complicated. My sister in law and her wife adopted a son. They are great parents.

 

Does it though? Sure it gives the same people that already hate them more ammo but most people know this was just trolling.

Neither do I

These new medical bills don’t just allow denials for unnecessary cosmetic surgery they allow it because of any moral or religious beliefs against the person. Trans people can be refused to be insured because they are trans, or religious people because they are the “wrong” religion.

Do you support that?

And that’s what it should be based on — the individuals. Entire groups should not be disqualified from adopting especially if taxpayers are the ones funding the agency.

 

What group, the one chanting or the community at large? No.

 

I don't hate anyone. I have a low opinion of their character, and their actions have strengthened my opposition to exposing their kind to young children without parental consent.

I don't remember if you were a part of the gay wedding cake thread, but I opposed the double standard. Bakers should not have to produce any product against their will, but the same products they already sell, they should sell to everyone.

Health insurance companies could refuse to insure obese people, smokers, alcoholics, and those with existing health conditions. Adding them to the group increases the cost for healthy people. I can see the point. Since we have moved in the direction of insuring all regardless of existing conditions, I don't see why trans patients would be considered uninsurable.

Personally, I believe those with unhealthy habits should pay more for insurance. Those lacking the ability to pay should work off their debt on the elliptical. I am half joking!

 

Hi, Just A Man.

The chant was either a statement of intent or the turning of an accusation into a taunt.

Unless those making the chant are queried, I know of no way to distinguish between the two.

Regards, stay safe 'n well.

 

I am not arguing they be around children without parental consent. Why do you keep bringing it up?

I am somewhat in agreement as long as it applies to all groups equally. I don’t think it pushes for social cohesion especially seeing that the groups that are mostly pushing for this kind of thing are the most federally and state protected group in the nation.

I think healthcare should be a benefit of paying taxes and being a US citizen. I don’t think people should be punished because they have a health condition. We already have children dying due to not being able to afford insulin — I hope that anyone that pushes a system where a type one diabetic faces starvation or medicine faces an agonizing existence.

 

Sorry. I just checked the OP once again. There's no link.

So, the chant was to mock right wingers.