Hillary Has More Balls Than Bobo: "I take Responsibility for Benghazi"

Sidebar:

The strain of the last 4 yrs has become very evident on most of those involved in ruining, er rather, running this country:


Barack went from a good-looking Black man in 2008 to the aged Bill Cosby (except for when they 'touched him up' for his DNC speech)

Hillary, who was perky and animated during the 2008 primaries now looks tired, fat, dumpy and has bad hair. Dont know if she has another campaign in her,,altho she has 4 yrs to get back in shape.

Michelle still looks good despite the 'demanding' duties of the 1st lady and her entourage of 100 ppl...must be the arugula.

But John McCain hasnt aged a bit, despite being held as a POW of Harry Reid's Senate!

 

This part is about Hillary. She says she accepts responsibility. Where is her resignation?

The one term Marxist, flexible with our enemies, president Barack Hussein Obama lied for two weeks to his subjects. He lied to the world at the UN. He lied as long as he could. If we cannot hold him accountable before the election we must hold him accountable by electing his replacement, President Romney.

Then we need to investigate Obama's role and fine and imprison him if he broke any laws.

 

I still want to know how Obama plans on explaining this tonight? That Hillary took the blame for him? It makes him look even more weak, but then again, maybe that was hills original idea.

 

That is not quite right.

Nixon, a Republican, lied to cover up a minor break-in of the Democratic Party Headquarters. He was forced to leave office. The final push was by Republicans.
Clinton, a Democrat, lied to a Grand Jury. He was impeached. He was, and continues to be defended by Democrats.
People died, and then the one term Marxist, flexible with our enemies, president Barack Hussein Obama lied. He is strongly defended by Democrats. He will always be strongly defended by Democrats.

We, the voters, need to arrange it so that Clinton and Obama can spend more time together as ex-presidents.

 

......................

 

Exactly. The security lapse is just as much Obama as it is Hillary. Perhaps more-so, as he sets the tone to keep it low-key politically. To make it look like the Libyans like us, and not reinforce it. But he didn't step up on that. She did. For all we know, Hill did exactly what Obama directed, in that she was told to keep our footprint minimal.

Regardless, it is Obama who is now teed up to be hit out of the ballpark. He looks weaker now than yesterday. Did you hear the reporter in VA holler out today "Mr President. Is Benghazi all Hillary's fault ?" Obama did not answer.

 

There were no riots in Benghazi. There was a coordinated attack. It consisted of an assault team armed with small arms. There was a weapons support team armed with rocket propelled grenades, mortars, and probably machine guns. And there was an intelligence exploitation team. In about four hours they took down two locations killing four Americans in the process and ransacking the two locations.

But there were no riots.

A Congressional investigation is in order to unravel the rat's nest. People need to be fired. Those that have broken laws must be punished.

 

Hillary has not taken 'full responsibility', she is still employed.

 

It is known that she did not want to be a part of Obama's second term, God forbid. She likely realizes she is essentially given a pink slip in three weeks. She has now made Obama look even weaker, as "the buck stops over there" is not going to fly. And most importantly, she has drawn a line between State and the made-up story. There is a foul odor in the air over Benghazi, but she will likely stink the least when this is all over.

 

Great point!!

 

There were no riots leading up to the attack. Perhaps the video has something to do with the terrorists reason for the attack, then the Obama Administration needs to own the fact that they apologized to TERRORISTS! And let the American people try to digest that. Obama wanted us to believe that moderates were incited to riot and it got out of control. NOT THE CASE. Not even close.

I want to know if Obama adviors orchestrated this whole apology tour.

 

For sure,,,but Mitt has to be careful,,,real careful. You cant go calling the Prez a Liar. Mitt may hold it to the last debate[as you suggested], just to make sure. Since the Mod picks out the audience questions, she may skip that,,if she does Mitt may hold back.
Obama lied, people died.....

 

Of course you can. But it must be done with a certain panache. There is an art to it.

Actually people died. And then the one term Marxist, flexible with our enemies, president Barack Hussein Obama lied.

I think it is important to get the chronology right.

 

As MisterV says, there's plenty of low-hanging fruit there should Romney want a bite. He doesn't have to call him a liar, but he can sure as heck make the Obama Admin look like the Keystone Cops ! And he can surely save it for Monday. That last debate is just 6 days away. I think Sheiffer will go there pretty thoroughly. He did Sunday on Face the Nation..

 

He appointed as his Secretary of State one of the main advocates for the war.

 

Where was Clinton when Ambassador Rice was lying to the nation about the attacks? Instead she waited until the lies were exposed and the the (*)(*)(*)(*) hit the fan. What else could she do at that point?

 

It would go well for her and her career in politics if she did resign, but she won't. They've got her in too deep and she stupidly thinks the Obama dems will reward her later in 2016.

Did anyone notice she made the statement "fog of war"? What war? Obama won't even call it a terrorist act! Unless she was in a room filled with burning diesel fuel, she should probably just **** instead of continuing to spout BS.

 

Hey Cat. Hillary is an expert at the "fog of war" ! She dodged sniper fire, remember ! This is worth the minute .....

[video=youtube;uHVEDq6RVXc]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uHVEDq6RVXc[/video]

 

Yeah,,,,,a plethora of low hanging crap....hahahah

Honestly, I cant see Obama being much better than last time. He wont look down, but really he cant use any of those stupid talking points. He's a professor, he reads speech's, he's not good on his feet. Every time this guys TelePrompter
went out, he was finished.

One thing though,,if Obama makes it through without a heart attack the left will claim VICTORY,,A REAL COME BACK KID!!!

 

Yes,,it's a good thing my friend Loudnclear did not see that,,,he's a stickler on clarity....LOL

People died, Obama lied.....

Well, if anybody can pull it off Mitt can, I just do not know if he will want to take the chance.

 

Hey, I can't catch everything.

I think whether Mitt brings it up or not depends on the serve. I'm sure he's practiced several segues to bring up the topic if it isn't asked directly. I think he'll measure the tone of the event to decide which one to slide out there.

 

It's gonna be a dirty rotten shame if someone in the audience doesn't bring it up... pre-screened questions or not.

Wonder if security will come wrestle 'em to the ground and drag 'em out if they ask a different question?

 

Alright people...not one of you said anything that I can't see by turning on Sean Hannity or tuning into Rush Limbaugh.

One of the things law enforcement does when they are investigating crimes...is to control what the potential suspects know, and don't know. I find it completely unfathomable that the CIA, NSA, FBI, and whoever else is working on this is sitting around going "duh-eeee-george"

I think you good and kind folks need to really consider the possibility that the Obama admin can't tell the media what they're doing, and that the Romney campaign and conservative media are cultivating phoney outrage for electioneering purposes.

 

Really? I guess by lumping everybody's comment into one, you can avoid answering any.

What part of my statement do you disagree with?

 

Good grief this is lame. I showed you where the OP debunked your allegation. You just didn't read before you posted comments.

And secondly, your argument sucks bigtime. No one has said that the Administration had an obligation to tell us anything precise about the investigation. Being as Al Qaeda bragged on the internet that they did it, it would seem that cat was out of the bag already, was it not ? The entire argument has been to not lie to us so as to gain fraudulent political advantages.