Hillary's disservice to women

Are you saying they're not?

Women are just a valiant and deceitful as men.

Why your personal war on women?

 

Lol. Every single gop president was inconsistent. Try history books.

 

You've obviously been brainwashed by the liberal media. I have lived to see and experience every presidential election since Kennedy.

Steve

 

BRAVE to stay with the man that guarantees you a political career and continued high standard of living? Umm, no. If she divorced him, she was finished. She would've lost all her connections and power, besides maybe writing a book.. Sucking it up and sticking around was the EASY route. Leaving the lying, cheating scumbag would have been the HARD, BRAVE choice. She took the easy way out.

 

Not really. Maybe if she was more of a wife it wouldnt have happened.

 

Not only did she stay with him but she helped in the campaign the intimidate the women into silence.

 

You certainly have no obligation moral or otherwise preserve a marriage where one spouse is serially violating them and doing so by serially abusing other women, in fact I would think the higher obligation would be to get out of the marriage along with any children in that marriage so you can start a new one that does not involve such violations. That being said it is not that she just stuck with him but in fact enabled and falsely defended him going so far as to being part of the "Bimbo Eruption Squad" during his campaign.

But now she say all those women are to be believed, so what now that we all believe them?

 

LMAO...I love hearing moral right-wingers, who become apoplectic at the thought of gays defiling the sanctity of marriage, fulminate about how Hillary had the temerity to honor her marriage vows (for better or worse, richer or poorer, in sickness and in health).
Then they plump for an adulterous narcissist who sheds trophy wives like dandruff.
Who the hell do you people think you're kidding with this pap?

 

As opposed to immoral liberals defending it?

There was no sanctity in their marriage, the husband was a serial sexual abuser of other women and violator of that marriage and she was an enabler of it who took part in the lies to cover it up and the intimidation of the women he abused to shut them up. Spare me the high moral ground of their "marriage".

 

What part of "richer or poorer, in sickness and in health"---------------is rape that Bill is accused of by several women.????

 

Of course being the most powerful woman has always been her goal. That's why Hill never divorced cheating Bill.....b/c being his wife and riding on his coattails, she believed she could accomplish power and $$$. Well, her focus was power b/c $ always follows power and being his x-wife, she'd eventually be left behind and she's no dummy - she knew this.....yeah, a marriage of convenience always works for ambitious and corrupt females like her..........

 

No just reading political history at university. You're completely wrong about this and what's more you don't have a hope in hell of backing it up.

- - - Updated - - -

What part of her marriage vows commands her to divorce?

 

Why was their marriage your business and why do you make up this unproven nonsense about intimidating and rape?

 

She defended her husband? Wow what a monster. .

You guys are utterly beaten but please try to get this played as a comparison with trump that'll be fun.

- - - Updated - - -

She's not been quoted as saying that so you're just making it up.

 

`
I don't like Hillary nor do I consider her a template for females but that's not my point. Your analogy is somewhat warped.

Bill Clinton was unfaithful, that's established. However, do you realize how many women forgive their philandering husbands? I'm talking here good Christian woman, many married to Republican/conservative politicians, who have taken their mates back even after publicly shaming them? In that respect, Hillary is no different than any other Christian and/or woman who believes in the power of forgiveness. In that respect, your entire argument falls apart.

 

Strawman argument. First, you are the one that challenged MY assertion so it is up to you to provide the proof. I have backed up my position when I said I have lived and experienced every presidential election since Kennedy. YOU are the one only coming up with the childish argument, "no it isn't."

History books are only some other person's biased version of history. Think for yourself and back it up with critical thinking skills. In addition, ask for your money back from the university. They have done you no good in thinking for yourself.

Steve

 

Is she a strong pro women candidate, or a self serving shrew that is willing to over look rape and other actions by her husband to keep just to keep the perks and fame of being first lady? That is certainly not a woman's candidate, nor what the country needs.

 

Angry White Guys are constantly trying to dictate to women and Black Americans how they should vote, and women and Black Americans continue to decide for themselves. That came with White Guys allowing them both to vote.

Whether one subscribes to the adage that the definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results, the futile presumptuous alone is clearly deranged.

If Angry White Guys are seeking to have women and Black Americans vote as they insist they should, that is easily accomplished by presenting them with candidates and policies that they would prefer.

 

Because they made it my business.

Well I have sworn testimony what do you have?

I also have Hillary
“Don’t let anyone silence your voice, you have the right to be heard, the right be believed, and we are with you as you go forward.”

 

Yes, knowningly falsely doing so and as part of the Bimbo Eruption Squad that attempted to intimadate the women be abused into silence.

 

And more, why leave that out?

How many forgive their sexually abusing, sexually harassing and sexually assaulting husbands?

And lets stop with the canard about "good Christian women" have some religious or moral or ethical duty to stay with a husband who serially breaks the marriage vows. That is utter nonsense.

 

And perhaps that has run it's course and they will no longer listen to those angery liberal "masta's" and vote in their own self interest.

As we have seen as those groups vote for those Angry White Guys and all their promises and then their situations only worsen.

The question here being why on earth would they prefer the candidate the Angry White Guys are presenting after her enabling and defending her sexually abusing husband and gojng after the women be abused.

 

`
Push comes to shove, sexual morality from leadership is a feel-good concept that is now, bordering on being an anachronism. It ceased to exist long before I was born. I'm not looking for sexually moral leadership, I'm looking for prudent and compassionate leadership. Sexual morality, religion or lack thereof, sexual orientation, race, culture, etc, just are not determining factors I'm looking at for in a leader.

 

It's likely Hillary stayed with Bill because she got to share many of his girlfriends.

 

I fail for the life of me to see how Hillary & Bill are gonna try and use some
Hillary is BiG on Women's Rights issues.It's the complete opposite of reality.
Bill { Slick Willy } was a manifest Masher { harassed and sexually tried to
take advantage of the weaker sex } and Hillary went after any gal who accused
her masher hubby of Anything.
Bill Clinton dint lose his Law License { suspended for 5 years in Arkansas } on
account he was some Nice and cordial southern gentleman like a Kenny Rogers
or even jolly Burl Ives.
More like a mean as a rattler gone wild ... Billy Bob Thornton from the movie
- One False Move - { 1992 }.