House Republicans ask Hunter Biden for records on his business dealings

Discussion in 'Current Events' started by fullmetaljack, Feb 9, 2023.

  1. fullmetaljack

    fullmetaljack Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2017
    Messages:
    8,389
    Likes Received:
    7,132
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    It begins !

    "In a letter to Comer, Abbe Lowell, a lawyer for Hunter Biden, said the committee "lacks a legitimate legislative purpose and oversight basis for requesting such records from Mr. Biden, who is a private citizen." Lowell indicated they would not comply with the Republicans' request but offered to meet with committee members informally "to see whether Mr. Biden has information that may inform some legitimate legislative purpose."

    Gee, Lowell used an awful lot of words to say, "No, go pound sand."

    https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/co...ter-biden-records-business-dealings-rcna69884
     
    MiaBleu, mdrobster and Hey Now like this.
  2. drluggit

    drluggit Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2016
    Messages:
    31,173
    Likes Received:
    28,662
    Trophy Points:
    113
    LOL... Put him on subpoena and let him violate them, and have him arrested. Send the FBI with CNN in tow to document the perp walk in his boxers at 3 AM.... Fun stuff...
     
  3. Hey Now

    Hey Now Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 3, 2021
    Messages:
    18,262
    Likes Received:
    14,659
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Well, Comer is going to be an expert at sandbox pounding. He speaks in circle every time he opens his mouth on this topic.
     
  4. Oldyoungin

    Oldyoungin Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2013
    Messages:
    22,697
    Likes Received:
    6,223
    Trophy Points:
    113
    So much for Joe Biden's promise about being the "most transparent president". Anyone else remember that whopper of a lie?
     
    ricmortis, Nonnie, JET3534 and 4 others like this.
  5. Alwayssa

    Alwayssa Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2012
    Messages:
    32,956
    Likes Received:
    7,587
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I am not surprised by this. Usually what happens when a formal request by letter is given, but the party usually says no. Then the subpoena will come, and that will have, or should have, the legal basis for asking the information, which may include a legislative purpose. Then he will either have to comply or find a legal reason not to. Par for the course.
     
  6. Steve N

    Steve N Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2015
    Messages:
    71,626
    Likes Received:
    91,634
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Why would anyone have a problem with this request for records when national security is involved?


     
    Wild Bill Kelsoe and popscott like this.
  7. Oldyoungin

    Oldyoungin Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2013
    Messages:
    22,697
    Likes Received:
    6,223
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Plus his dad promised transparency.
     
    popscott likes this.
  8. fullmetaljack

    fullmetaljack Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2017
    Messages:
    8,389
    Likes Received:
    7,132
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Oh boy, this is going to be FUN !

    Is Hunter Biden a member of the administration ? Why, no he isn't !

    Who said anything about national security ?

    Poor , poor Republicans.
    Since the Orange Stain has set the standard for replying to records requests and replying to subpoenas, now you get to live with it !
     
  9. Oldyoungin

    Oldyoungin Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2013
    Messages:
    22,697
    Likes Received:
    6,223
    Trophy Points:
    113
    We all have our quirks. Anywho, some of us want to hold the man who promised transparency accountable. It's ok if you don't.
     
    popscott likes this.
  10. dairyair

    dairyair Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2010
    Messages:
    79,141
    Likes Received:
    19,982
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    What National Security?
    Transparency related to WH gov't business.

    How's this related to gov't WH business?
     
  11. Izzy

    Izzy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 12, 2022
    Messages:
    10,648
    Likes Received:
    6,077
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Female
    Lowell's name rang a bell.


    Hunter Biden's Lawyer Also Represented Ivanka Trump and ...
    https://www.newsweek.com › ... › Joe Biden

    6 days ago — Attorney Abbe Lowell has represented a number of high-profile clients including former Democratic presidential candidate John Edwards.

    snip:

    Lowell began representing the president's son in December and has already begun to take an aggressive approach. On Wednesday, Hunter Biden's legal team called for an investigation into individuals "there is considerable reason to believe violated various federal laws in accessing, copying, manipulating, and/or disseminating Mr. Biden's personal computer data."

    He cited former New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani, as well as computer repair shop owner John Paul Mac Isaac and former Trump adviser Steve Bannon, among a number of others.

    "The actions described above more than merit a full investigation and, depending on the resulting facts, may merit prosecution under various statues," Lowell wrote. "It is not a common thing for a private person and his counsel to seek someone else being investigated, but the actions and motives here require it."
     
  12. fullmetaljack

    fullmetaljack Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2017
    Messages:
    8,389
    Likes Received:
    7,132
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Feel free to speak for yourself, not for me and not for "some of us".
     
  13. Hey Now

    Hey Now Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 3, 2021
    Messages:
    18,262
    Likes Received:
    14,659
    Trophy Points:
    113
    He also represented Jarod Kushner when Kush AKA El Saud Stooge appeared before Congress.
     
    MiaBleu and Quantum Nerd like this.
  14. Oldyoungin

    Oldyoungin Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2013
    Messages:
    22,697
    Likes Received:
    6,223
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I'll continue the way I wish. We will continue to press Biden for transparency, as he promised. It's up to you if you want to join and hold him accountable.
     
    Last edited: Feb 9, 2023
  15. gamma875

    gamma875 Banned

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2023
    Messages:
    1,483
    Likes Received:
    713
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Again on what grounds? You have some new revelations?

    Or challenge it in court and have it dismissed.
    Careful, such wet dreams make a mess of bedding...
     
    WalterSobchak likes this.
  16. gamma875

    gamma875 Banned

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2023
    Messages:
    1,483
    Likes Received:
    713
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Just out of curiosity, what possible legislative purpose? What if he too pleads the 5th to every question?
     
  17. gamma875

    gamma875 Banned

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2023
    Messages:
    1,483
    Likes Received:
    713
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    What national security?
     
    Noone, WalterSobchak and Hey Now like this.
  18. Izzy

    Izzy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 12, 2022
    Messages:
    10,648
    Likes Received:
    6,077
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Female
    Know anything about this?

    Justice Department investigation[edit]
    'As of December 2020, the United States Department of Justice's Public Integrity Section was investigating Lowell for his role in an alleged "secret lobbying scheme" and potential bribery in exchange for a pardon. Lowell was enlisted by California billionaire Sanford Diller to seek a pardon for his friend Hugh Baras.[21]

    Lowell's involvement came to light in an August 28, 2020 court opinion by Judge Beryl Howell that found Lowell's communications were exempt from standard attorney-client privileges "because they potentially contained both evidence of crimes and involved nonlawyer third parties." As part of the alleged bribery-for-pardon scheme, Lowell interacted with the White House Counsel's Office, and "according to documents reviewed by the [Wall Street] Journal, Mr. Lowell and Mr. Diller discussed contacting top officials in the [Trump] administration."[21]

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abbe_Lowell
     
    Hey Now likes this.
  19. Hey Now

    Hey Now Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 3, 2021
    Messages:
    18,262
    Likes Received:
    14,659
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Hummmm, wow! No I did not know about this! Very interesting since he seems to have skated on the lobbying scheme.
     
  20. Darthcervantes

    Darthcervantes Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Oct 4, 2018
    Messages:
    17,648
    Likes Received:
    17,773
    Trophy Points:
    113
    This is some solid proof of a compromised justice system. Thanks for reminding us all of the corruption.
     
  21. popscott

    popscott Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 3, 2021
    Messages:
    18,945
    Likes Received:
    12,674
    Trophy Points:
    113
    This National security..... just one example here... I've got more.... what did president Joe Biden know..... and when did he know it? Was he involved in any of Hunter's selling of influence...

    Interesting article
    https://archive.ph/J9qgm
    Kathy Chung.... where have we heard that name before...
    Will the GOP be looking into why Joe gave Hunter high level phone numbers to his crack head son?????
    Please notice it was sent to Hunter and Robert.L.Peters@pci.gov (which is Joe's pseudonyms on e-mails) from the office of the vice president while he was still in office.

    National security nightmare of Hunter Biden's abandoned laptop containing phone numbers for the Clintons, Secret Service officers and most of the Obama cabinet plus his sex and drug addictions - all secured by the password Hunter02

    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...-security-nightmare-Hunter-Bidens-laptop.html

    https://bidenlaptopemails.com/biden-emails/email.php?id=20150607-133904_22008

    [​IMG]
     
    Steve N likes this.
  22. Darthcervantes

    Darthcervantes Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Oct 4, 2018
    Messages:
    17,648
    Likes Received:
    17,773
    Trophy Points:
    113
    They would rather gloat about the bidens illegally pocketing money. This sort of thing is what the left calls "victory"
     
  23. Trixare4kids

    Trixare4kids Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2021
    Messages:
    8,558
    Likes Received:
    11,642
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I'd be remiss if I didn't remind my Democrat friends that 'nobody is above the law' and that would also include the president's son, who will be subpoenaed for records despite his high-priced lawyer's threats.
     
  24. Alwayssa

    Alwayssa Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2012
    Messages:
    32,956
    Likes Received:
    7,587
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Don't know yet and I have not put much thought into it. But the Supreme Court does give wide discretion to congressional subpoenas though.

    A possible legislative purpose would be more disclosure laws on Presidents and presidential candidates and their immediate family members and their business/personal dealings. With Trump and the Tax Returns, the legislative purpose was to require all Presidential Candidates to disclose their tax returns and have a more thorough financial disclosure to show any possible conflict of interest. At least that is what they wrote in the report. Whether it comes to fruition or not remains to be seen.
     
  25. Alwayssa

    Alwayssa Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2012
    Messages:
    32,956
    Likes Received:
    7,587
    Trophy Points:
    113
    That has not happened yet. Right now, the art dealer, through his attorney, provided a reason. Whether you agree with the reason or not is really not the point. But a reason was given. Now it is up to the Chair and that committee to determine if that is a valid reason or not. If not, then they can sue the art dealer and let the courts decide. This is far different than what Bannon did who simply said "no" and did not give a reason whatsoever.
     
    omni, WalterSobchak and Hey Now like this.

Share This Page