How does black and brown diversity benefit white run societies?

Chordates are bilaterally similar and evolved two eyes simultaneously. Would 9000 eyes be even better? Is "number of eyes" a strong analogy to "diversity of races"? You make want to work on your argument.



​

 

Genes are blue prints for molecules. They don't act.



​

 

In chemistry we use the term "act".



​

 

Ask a bee. Many species have found competitive advantage in considering more than two perspectives. Few have found it in considering only one.



​

 

Do you indent your vacuous posts to make them seem more profound? Can you explain the advantage of the "perspectives" of Chinese copying, Islamic theocracy, and Negro indolence?



​

 

It is not necessary to explain the advantage of things that do not exist. The attributes or actions you want to assign are not universal to folks who share whatever criteria you want to use to define a race. They are therefore not a result of race.

The advantage of different perspectives is an understanding of depth. Those who see the world from only one perspective, lack it.



​

 

there is a genetic survival benefit

Hitler tried to de-diversify his country, that was not good either

 

you prefer them copy "Cracker" indolence... why do we need to use words like that, every races even whites has some that do not want to work

 

Can you explain why Brazil isn't a superpower with all of the "perspectives". Can you list some "perspectives"?


​

- - - Updated - - -

He resisted Jewish led genocide of Germans and lost.

- - - Updated - - -

If you go to a primary school they can explain "average" to you.

 

A perspective is a different point of view, a different way to look at a problem. If you are truly unaware that different perspectives exist, I don't think I can help identify them.

A useful exercise though may be picking up a can of soda. From one perspective it's shape is a circle, from anther a rectangle. If you really want to understand that shape you need to consider many points of view. None of them inherently more valuable, but taken together many perspectives give you greater understanding of what you're looking at.

Some would argue the BRIC nations are the emerging super-powers. I'm not one of them. I happen to think many of Brazil's problems are a result of corrupt leaders and socialist policies. I think their recent rise has been more a function of natural resources it has in excess — that U.S. companies have helped them develop — and our own stagnating productivity due to ridiculous levels of entitlement, than anything those nations have done especially well.

But those are just my general opinions. No one can tell you specifically why a nation or a person did not make all the choices it did not make. If someone claims otherwise, that person probably underestimates the depth of the question.



​

 

I didn't ask you to define perspective. I asked you to list some of the perspectives brown and black people bring that are useful. And also to explain why "perspectives" of brown people don't fix Brazil.

Is being a counter productive moron a perspective?

 

I already crushed this argument.

There is more genetic diversity than at any point in human history--please stop with this line of thinking.

 

And like he said, Brazil is a diverse paradise.

 

Perspectives don't fix things. Lack of perspectives can cause you to misunderstand or miss things. Although I cannot tell you what useful perspectives your right eye brings that are more useful than your left, having both let's you see more and better than you would with only one.

Yes, I believe even your perspectives add some value.



​

 

Germans still exist.



​

 

I prefer Hawaii.



​

 

oh so now your changing what you were saying, diversity good, but is there a point it becomes too much diversity and is that better or worse sounds like your asking now

 

What evidence do you have that racial diversity increases diversity of thought?

 

I don't see any evidence or logic that a species adapted to a region benefits from the introduction of a closely related subspecies adapted to an entirely different environment.

Could you give an example?

 

I didn't ask you that. I asked what you thought would be the probability that 14/14 genes linked to educational attainment are favorably expressed for whites compared to blacks.

Do you understand what I'm asking?

 

Tough. That's the answer.

 

Your approach is your perspective. People who come from different backgrounds have different perspectives, by definition.



​

 

There is only one living species of human.



​

 

You missed the point and totally miss the debate.
No one is arguing that Humans aren't one species, but whether they have Subspecies/Races WITHIN that species.
Ya know, like are closest ancestors
Chimps, 2 Species with 2 subspecies/RACES each
Gorillas, 2 Species with 6 or 7 Subspecies./RACES between them.
Got the idea yet

PS: Polydectes is a Total ONE-LINE-Washout who lowers/destroys debate. Four pages now.
Adding No real info/evidence presented, and refuting no real info/evidence presented.
This is what happens that destroys message boards. LCD (Lowest common denominator) posters who dumb down the board using it like IM.
Now "Taxpayer" Lowers the debate even further (is that Possible?!) with his mere phrases.
ZERO content Garbage posting/posters.
+​

 

There are no other living subspecies of humans.



​