How Holyweird primes and poisons Americans.

Obviously there is no doubt who pulls the strings in Hollyweird, right? If you want to know who rules it, witness the reaction, if you will, to the brilliantly made, Passion of The Christ. Were it not for the fact that Mr Gibson is rich enough and determined enough to push through with his own films, I dare say they may have rewritten it, so that Jesus was 'just a guy, and anyway, it was the Taliban that did it'.

And yet, what it really was, was a finely produced work, that was a fair reflection on just who plotted against Jesus, and demanded his execution.

To the same end, imagine if you will, if several films were released globally, by a gentile owned Holywood, and among the titles and themes a few short years, were the 'comical' look at (let me think), oh, yes, would they laugh and like it if the theme of the comedy was centered around allegations against Jews kidnapping Christian children? Would they like the 'witty' impression that would leave, on the watcher?

Perhaps we could have a blockbuster, that a three hour epic of all the massacres that Jews have carried out, since invading their stolen landspace, and the lies of their religous claims.

How would that sit? Or rather than another attack on the Church, such as in V, how about a film in which the central charachter is a paedo Rabbi instead? How would that sound? How would it the be if such films were shown to a wordwide audience, over and over and over?

Nice? Good? Hate disguised as cinema?

The latter? Do not be a hypocrite then.

******

Argo is a propaganda film. Like the films of Nazi publicist Leni Riefenstahl, it is well-made. Like those of Riefenstahl, it glorifies a murderous criminal organization. And like those of Riefenstahl, its ultimate purpose is to elicit hatred and turn its audience into mass murderers.


Riefenstahl glorified the Nazi party; Argo glorifies the CIA. Riefenstahl made Nazi war-mongering and Jew-hatred look beautiful; Argo makes Zionist-incited islamophobia and iranophobia look natural and inevitable and desirable.

Riefenstahl's films helped open the door to World War II, which killed 70 million people.

Argo is designed to open the door to war on Iran and World War III, which could kill hundreds of millions or even billions.

The only award the makers of Argo deserve is a criminal conviction for crimes against humanity. Instead, Hollywood's Zionist mafia has handed them an Oscar for best film of the year. The members of the academy should themselves be in the docket, facing war crimes charges, right alongside Ben Affleck.

But Affleck and the Hollywood mob aren't just guilty of war crimes. They are equally guilty of treason against the United States of America.


Hollywood, you see, is a virtually 100% Jewish enclave. And with a few noble exceptions, the Jewish billionaires who own and run Hollywood, and determine what kinds of motion pictures dominate the world, are rabid supporters of Israel's genocide in Occupied Palestine. Their films should be considered “enemy propaganda” - not just by Palestinians and their supporters, but by the American people.

Why? Because war on Iran - as Zbigniew Brzezinski and Chuck Hagel and all genuinely American strategists have been screaming from the rooftops - is an Israeli plan, not an American plan.

The Israelis want to drag America into wars against their enemies. And Iran is Israel's public enemy number one.

Israel's real problem with Iran isn't those nonexistent nukes. (Both the CIA and Mossad have assured us that Iran is not building nuclear weapons.) Israel's problem is that Iran's government offers formidable ideological and material support to the Palestinian resistance.

Why is that America's problem?

Because America is dominated by a powerful, treasonous Israeli fifth column. As Jewish, pro-Zionist comedian Bill Maher recently admitted, “The Israelis are controlling our government.”

Argo is enemy propaganda from Israeli-occupied Hollywood. It is a slick attempt to brainwash Americans into seeing Iranians as enemies. Argo seeks to drag the American consciousness back to 1979, when Iranians overthrew their CIA-installed torturer-in-chief, the Shah, and sought justice for his decades of misrule. It seeks to hide the fact that today, America and Iran should have good relations - and would have good relations, if Israel weren't running US foreign policy.

I watched Argo on the plane en route to Iran, where I recently spent two weeks. The film depicts Iranians as scowling, bearded fanatics lusting for American blood. When I arrived in Tehran, I was surprised - well, not really that surprised - to discover that Iranians are friendly, gracious, smiling, generous people who absolutely love Americans. (They have no difficulty making the distinction between the American people, and the policies of the Israeli-dominated American government.)

After being held hostage to their kindness, hospitality, and generosity for fourteen days, all I can say is that I hope they kidnap me again soon.

Most Americans, unfortunately, do not have the opportunity to visit Iran.

If you put Mr. Average American on a plane for Tehran, and showed him Argo as the in-flight movie, he would probably have a panic attack and try to kick open the emergency exit door and bail out of the plane. That, of course, is precisely the kind of reaction the Hollywood Zionists created Argo to elicit.

In some ways, Argo is almost like a zombie horror movie, with Americans as protagonists, and Iranians as evil flesh-eating zombies. When, in Argo, the small group of Americans visits Tehran's magnificent Grand Bazaar, only to be surrounded, mobbed, and threatened by vicious Iranian extremists hungering for their flesh and thirsting for their blood, I was reminded of nothing so much as the zombies-in-the-shopping-mall scenes from George Romero's horror classic, Dawn of the Dead.

When I visited a bazaar in Tehran earlier this month, I had a wonderful time. The scene was lively and colorful. The throngs of shoppers were enjoying themselves. The sellers were courteous and fun to haggle with. Maybe they were hungering for my dollars and thirsting for my coins, but if so, they were reasonably polite about it. I did not experience any zombie attacks.

Argo depicts Iran as a living hell for Americans. But for me and the other Americans I visited with, it was more like a paradise.

Americans can live well in Iran on very little money. The Iranian rial's value has dropped in relation to the dollar, thanks to the Zionist banksters' currency war. A can of Coca-Cola or a candy bar costs a nickle, a gourmet meal can be had for a few dollars, and all sorts of Iranian-made items are available at bargain prices. (Iranians are getting very good at making all kinds of products, since the sanctions have made imports prohibitively expensive.)


But the best thing about Iran is its people. There are no false guides and scammers accosting you, as in some Middle Eastern countries. Iran's people, regardless of philosophical, political, or religious persuasion, are both dignified and genuinely friendly. They have overcome the colonialist-imposed schizoid complex of servility/resentment. Iranians deal with Westerners, including Americans, naturally and amiably as equals.

When will the American government start treating Iran on a similar basis of natural amiability and equality?

The short answer: As soon as Americans take a lead from Bill Maher, and shake off Israel's domination of their country.

When that happens, the makers of Argo, and the other Israeli occupiers of America's media and entertainment industry, may have to seek refuge in Paraguay.

http://www.presstv.ir/detail/2013/02/25/290795/oscar-for-argo-a-crime-against-humanity/

 

Jack, you should look up the history of the story of the death of Christ, as to not repeat the mistakes of history.

Their is no historical backing for this story(Christs actual sufferings, not the historical events), and is best traced back to a play meant to flame anti-semitism.

Can we beat up on AIPAC some, starting to feel unclean with the last few posts I have made towards you.

 

True Christians will tell you different, but you are missing the actual point, and focusing on something small.

Anyway, back to the actual bigger picture...

Brainwashing by cinema..

Argo is a 2012 American dramatic thriller film directed by Ben Affleck; it is a dramatization of and is based on a 2007 article about the "Canadian Caper", in which Tony Mendez, a CIA operative, led the rescue of six U.S. diplomats from Tehran, Iran, during the 1979 Iran hostage crisis.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argo_(2012_film)


For years, the North African Republic of Wadiya has been ruled by Admiral General Haffaz Aladeen, a childish, lecherous, misogynous, anti-western and antisemitic despot who surrounds himself with female bodyguards, refuses to allow Wadiyan oil to be sold internationally and is working on developing nuclear weapons.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Dictator_(2012_film)

The plot revolves around King Leonidas (Gerard Butler), who leads 300 Spartans into battle against Persian "god-King" Xerxes (Rodrigo Santoro) and his army of more than 300,000 soldiers.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/300_(film)

Unthinkable is a 2010 American suspense thriller film directed by Gregor Jordan and starring Samuel L. Jackson, Michael Sheen and Carrie-Anne Moss. It was released direct-to-video on June 14, 2010.[2] The film its noteworthy for the controversy it generated around its subject matter, the torture of a man who threatens to detonate three nuclear bombs in separate U.S. cities.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unthinkable

 

The only "history" we have about Jesus is a collection of religious texts of dubious origins.

 

Yeah, this would be known as all written evidence prior to the Renassiance.

Something about a printing press, and reglular people becoming educated.

 

It goes beyond how the text was recorded. There are issues of authorship, disagreement between sources, similarities to known myths of the period and a lack of corroborating statements from other sources, in particular more contemporary sources and less biased and myth-laden sources.

Do people pretend today that Mitra and Hercules really lived? I think we know better, and the sources we have for them are quite on par with what we have for Jesus. Jesus just happens to be a slightly more recent mytho-historical character than they, and our culture just happens to be dominated by a religious tradition built around the idea that Jesus was real. It is a lie very oft repeated, probably nothing more.

 

Aside from using it as the war propaganda machine, as I am saying, it is also used in other ways, as well, which I shall get to in a moment.

However, please try to imagine what I laid out in the OP, over and over, and passed off as comedy, drama, and action.

 

Hollywood has a long history of peddling propaganda disguised as entertainment, from films like, for example, The Green Berets through to The Deer Hunter and Pearl Harbor. I think Jack's characterization of the kind of Hollywood produced films that depict violence and killing to the point that it's become normalized (and thus large swathes of the viewing public have therefore tended to become de-sensitized to such brutality), is an accurate one. Many of these sometimes crude, also often subtle, forms of propaganda are clearly highly politicised in order to create the kinds of negative stereotypes mentioned for the purpose of rendering the 'other' as people somehow less worthy, dehumanizing them to the point of mere abstractions.

 

Well, ignoring for a moment that this isn't a news article but an opinion piece, let's look a bit at the article, shall we?

...to Michelle Obama showing up and everyone just loving her, dahling. Then imagine the reaction had Laura Bush done the same. So yeah, the people running Hollyweird? I'll call them - Liberals.

Oh, good grief. Melodramatic much? I don't bother with movies much anymore, but having not seen Argo, I looked up the synopsis on Wiki, and here is what it says:

Well, gawl-lee. How dare we make those criminals holding hostages look like criminals.

This is impossible to take seriously. Really? I can't wait to see Iran having Ben Affleck hauled off in irons. Now, if bad acting were a crime, most of Hollywood would be dead, but thankfully, making a film that makes Iran look bad isn't a criminal offense. And in any event, Affleck should have gotten the death penalty for Gigli. If he didn't get the chair for that, he's untouchable. Quick, someone inform the Iranian Minister of Entertainment!

Seriously? They're guilty of WAR CRIMES? Quick, someone tell me when the war started. I - didn't know we were currently at war with Iran.

Yeah, tell that to the people who made John Carter. Wait a minute, how many Oscars did the Avengers score again?

This may come as a bit of a surprise to PressTV, but considering that a great deal of people in the US were at least teenagers in 1979 and remember what happened, I doubt they need to be reminded how much we couldn't stand Iran. And in any event, the last thing we WANT is to be dragged back to 1979, considering we'd then have to re-live the Jimmah Cahtah administration again.

Now THERE'S a genius plan right there. Show Argo on a trip to Iran. What was the second movie feature, Airport? What do they show on Iranian cruise ships, The Poseidon Adventure?

Yeah, I'm sure the Ayatollah Khomeini was really a party guy to any Americans at the time.

So are you saying nothing has changed in Iran since 1979, or well, if it has, is it possible the movie was accurately portraying the Iranian zeitgeist of the times as opposed to today, or ... what IS your point, exactly? Is it possible that being a staff writer for the Iranian press organ, you might be treated a tad sight better than others? Nah, couldn't be. Next thing you know, you'll be speaking of Iran the same way a travel agent would. But no, no one could be that transparent a shill.

Oops. Guess I was wrong, you CAN be that transparent a shill.

And of course working as a shill for PressTV couldn't possibly be shading your opinion of Iranians there.

 

Well let us take, for example, Sash Baron Cohen.

Comic or speader of hate through the vehicle of comedy?

Most won't even realise it, those it is aimed at, but after a while it is clear he is no better than German propaganda 'humour', or any other, for that matter.

And he is a danger too.

[video=youtube;ZheYqoKtt60]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZheYqoKtt60&feature=player_detailpage[/video]

You can imagine how 'hilarious' it would be if that were a non Jew, setting up a Jew in a dangerous situation.

 

Bruno's Zion

Oy vey, they wouldn't like it the other way, would they..

[video=youtube;gdXLAhS5ELU]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gdXLAhS5ELU&feature=player_detailpage[/video]

 

Wow I have some interesting reactions to the Oscar for best picture over the years. But this has set the bar very very high

 

It's not about one film, don't you see that?

 

Imagine if the hero figure in a film, the one that people form an affinity with, said 'I get to shoot Jews all day, hey what's not to like'.

Moviegoers tweet desire to kill white people after seeing 'Django Unchained'

http://www.examiner.com/article/mov...ll-white-people-after-seeing-django-unchained

 

Jack, are you at all aware that almost nobody takes the Oscars seriously anymore?

 

It.

Is.

Not.

About.

An.

Oscar.

In.

Itself.

 

were Ali G and Borat muslim?

 

So, do we yet know exactly what war crime Ben Affleck is wanted for? Dictionary.com lists a war crime as "crimes committed against an enemy, prisoners of war, or subjects in wartime that violate international agreements or, as in the case of genocide, are offenses against humanity." I'm not really sure how Ben committed any there. Granted, his acting skills could be considered an offense against humanity, but I don't think he's a soldier in any war we know of. Anyone know his rank and serial number?

 

Shouldn't this be in a conspiracy section of the forum? There are movies made from the other point of view. They are just not popular in America. There's no huge Jewish Hollywood conspiracy.

 

What 'other point of view'?

 

There are plenty of movies that show the Arab perspective. They are usually not popular in America as many movies that need subtitles don't catch on here. That or the movies are just really low quality recordings that are obviously amateur made.

 

Right.

Next point?

 

There is no next point since now you've just admitted that your OP in this thread is void, null, destroyed and founded on nothing but conspiracy theories.

Thread over/

 

Many a true word said in jest..


[video=youtube;NxPnLGBNlAs]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NxPnLGBNlAs&feature=player_embedded[/video]

 

Jack, not to be mean, but.....you're going to die (hopefully a very old man).....and still 99% of America will NOT have "woken up" and "overthrown" the "International Jewish Conspiracy"......same as ol' Henry Ford and the guys who wrote the Protocols in the late 1800s.

At this point.....the pattern is clear. And you'll have wasted sooooooooooo much of your time engaging in the fantasy that YOU, you will finally be "the One" using the Internet who busts up the "Jewish Cabal".....and that pain, as you lay there in the hospital bed, realizing the WASTE of your life.....will be Hellish.

I'm truly sorry for you...and those like you of any persuasion.