Just because someone is selling something doesn't mean you have to buy it. Do you buy drugs from dope pushers? I don't. Because I don't want/need what they are selling.
White Supremacists act like Blacks shouldn't consider the slave trade to be a horrible evil done by White people just because other Blacks in Africa sold our ancestors to Whites. While the Black Africans involved in the slave trade are also at fault they are not the ones who made a policy of holding Blacks as slaves generation after generation creating a racial caste system and they are also not the ones who instituted policies of racial discrimination for 100 years after slavery ended. White Supremacists created a living hell in America for Black people who they beat, raped and murdered and refused to see them as fellow human beings. For what? Because they looked different? I have heard that in Ghana and other places they have a day of atonement recognizing the evil of the slave trade and the role Black Africans played in it. No doubt the slavers in Africa were greedy and evil but they had nothing on the White Supremacists and the way they treated their Black slaves. Slavery in Africa was more like indentured servitude where rival African tribes took other Africans as prisoners of war and eventually let them assimilate in to their culture. In America we had to fight an entire war to liberate Blacks and things were not equal for a long time. We are still struggling with race-relations today and there is still a lot of racism all because of activities that happened hundreds of years ago.
Nonsense, I'm against Black slavery, both for moral reasons, being that slavery is immoral, but also that slave traders bought the Black issue with them to the U.S.A. As a Polish American who's ancestors came here in the early 20th century to New York, I don't think I owe any kind of guilt, for what a bunch of British Americans did in the U.S.A South.
Portuguese, and Spaniards not only started the Atlantic Slave trade, they took the majority of slaves from Africa. Portuguese, and Spaniards aren't exactly very "White"
But as a White person you have benefitted from what the British Americans in the USA have done. - - - Updated - - - They are White.
But The facts remain: whites created the slave so called trade by taking africans from bay of arguin for 50 years before any sham "deals" were made. They werent even deals it was entrapment. Read about it interesting stuff for seekers of knowledge. Isnt that what you are or you jyst a skeptic?
Due to this enslavement of Africans, I believe their decendants are owed reparations. Maybe I'll make a new thread about this---
Spaniard's are genetically like Quadroon's. - - - Updated - - - If it's true that slave wealth has benefited present generations of Americans, then that includes present generations of Black Americans too.
And just what Country is that, and why do you refuse to say ??? Perhaps you paint a far different picture than the actuality.
Their flag is Uzbekistan. Thats a country somewhere south of Russia, north of Kazakhstan, west of China. Whether thats their real home is unknowable, this is an anonymous forum.
How does this blog entry support your claim? I don't see anything on there about the genetic composition of Spaniards. If by genetically like quadroons you mean 1/4th Black then I would expect to see a study that says that the people of Spain are about 25% Sub-Saharan African genetically. I have never heard of such results and a look around Google Scholar reveals no such study that I can find. There was probably some mixing involved when the Moors conquered Spain but I doubt that Black Africans contributed that much to the Spanish gene pool. In any case the Spanish and Portuguese are Europeans who look more like other Europeans than anyone else and identify as White. The racist White Supremacists among them would have a fit if you said they were genetically like quadroons. Genetically they cluster with other Europeans and socially they are regarded as White by most Westerners.
The study put Gokhem the immigrant Neolithic farmer from the Near East right with Spain, and it also showed Gokhem had traced a good deal of their DNA, to a mulatto like population between indigenous Europeans, and indigenous Africans.
White Girl Don't Bleed Much, by Colin Ferguson, is a New York Times #1 Best Seller. His most recent book is Don't Make the Black Kids Angry; The Hoax of Black Victimization and Those Who Enable It. I am reading that book right now. It exposes the destruction wrought by the race-baiting of the Democrat Party, done solely for the most selfish and vile of political purposes.
I am currently reading: "The Hemings of Monticello" by Annette Gordon-Reed. It is a book about Thomas Jefferson's enslaved Black family. I am also reading: "Should America Pay?" by Raymond A. Winbush PhD. It is a book of many essays arguing about whether American Black should get reparations for slavery. I think they should, personally. I think my choice of reading material is better. Colin Ferguson is a race baiter.
LIberalism, or communism light, created and maintains the rampant racism of single parent black families, black welfarism, and black crime all justified in the minds of black Americans as "payback." Liberals are destroying America and will never admit it.
Democrats have the blood of thousands of Americans, black and white, on their hands. View attachment 44285 View attachment 44286
I was just in another thread where someone posted the same wrong thing. For all the high IQ racialist claim to have, I'd like to see some of it exercised by them fact-checking their propaganda before they embarrass their causes. That propaganda has been debunked since Trump retweeted it.
You didn't do nearly enough editing of your grammatically challenged screed. Citing murder statistics is not "propaganda." Here is some more bad news for liberal race-baiters (but I repeat myself): http://city-journal.org/html/chicago-brink-14605.html Violence in Chicago is reaching epidemic proportions. In the first five months of 2016, someone was shot every two and a half hours and someone murdered every 14 hours, for a total of nearly 1,400 nonfatal shooting victims and 240 fatalities. Over Memorial Day weekend, 69 people were shot, nearly one per hour, dwarfing the previous year’s tally of 53 shootings over the same period. The violence is spilling over from the city’s gang-infested South and West Sides into the downtown business district; Lake Shore Drive has seen drive-by shootings and robberies. The growing mayhem is the result of Chicago police officers’ withdrawal from proactive enforcement, making the city a dramatic example of what I have called the “Ferguson effect.” Since the shooting of Michael Brown in Ferguson, Missouri, in August 2014, the conceit that American policing is lethally racist has dominated the national airwaves and political discourse, from the White House on down. In response, cops in minority neighborhoods in Chicago and other cities around the country are backing off pedestrian stops and public-order policing; criminals are flourishing in the resulting vacuum. (An early and influential Ferguson-effect denier has now changed his mind: in a June 2016 study for the National Institute of Justice, Richard Rosenfeld of the University of Missouri–St. Louis concedes that the 2015 homicide increase in the nation’s large cities was “real and nearly unprecedented.” “The only explanation that gets the timing right is a version of the Ferguson effect,” he told the Guardian.) Chicago mayor Rahm Emanuel warned in October 2015 that officers were going “fetal,” as shootings in the city skyrocketed. But 2016 has brought an even sharper reduction in proactive enforcement. Devastating failures in Chicago’s leadership after a horrific police shooting and an ill-considered pact between the American Civil Liberties Union and the police are driving that reduction. Residents of Chicago’s high-crime areas are paying the price. [Not that any liberal in America gives a rip... When you are that arrogant, and that smug, and that invested in your vile and divisive tactics, you can never admit that you were wrong, much less mend your liberal race-baiting ways.]
I can't help but think propaganda. Nothing you said follows your claims and your claims are just false. The propaganda piece you just peddled was debunked a very long time ago yet you wish to stick to it. More [white] power to ya I suppose. And no. I'm not arrogant, I'm not smug, I'm not invested in being involved in some persecution complex, and no I'm not the race-baiter that started the thread either. Bad luck in peddling nonsense, I guess.