That site says the covid vaccine is safe and effective. https://science.feedback.org/review...al-medical-crisis-baseless-oan-daily-sceptic/ That's a damage-control site and the info in it is written by sophists who don't even believe their own arguments.
Uhuh.... https://science.feedback.org/review...al-medical-crisis-baseless-oan-daily-sceptic/ Wow, the whole 3-way spam cut-and-paste statement in one. 1. Not damage control, there's no damage to control. Ludicrous circular reasoning. 2. Not written by "sophists". Written by experts. Ludicrous circular reasoning. 3. They DO believe their own arguments. An absolutely absurd thing to say. Ludicrous circular reasoning.
This person is an expert. Therefore, he's not a sophist. I see a flaw in your logic. I think some experts can be swayed by bribes or coercion and threats. What do you think? These people are experts. http://www.politicalforum.com/index...vaccine-causes-cancer.622137/#post-1075069766 http://www.politicalforum.com/index...vaccine-causes-cancer.622137/#post-1075070847 http://www.politicalforum.com/index...vaccine-causes-cancer.622137/#post-1075072177 http://www.politicalforum.com/index...vaccine-causes-cancer.622137/#post-1075093959 http://www.politicalforum.com/index...vaccine-causes-cancer.622137/#post-1075158042 Why do you dismiss what they say? http://www.politicalforum.com/index...e-causes-cancer.622137/page-3#post-1075181067
Works for me. The irony here is colossal, clearly you don't! Sure, that's a possibility. We're not talking about one person here, we're talking about every country-specific medical control, CDC, FDA, WHO etc. Every pharmaceutical trial, study, countless, COUNTLESS! rebuttal statements involving clear data and explanations. I think experts can be swayed by poor decisions, experts are people too, susceptible to the same foolish mistakes made by conspiracy theorists. Then by your logic, sophists. Well, I spend more than 10 seconds on a link, understand what I'm reading, find counter evidence 100 times more compelling in both volume and content. I base it on the logic behind the claim, how is this possible, numbers involved, keeping the batshit a secret etc.
I understand what I read and watch. The info in the stuff I post is consistent with what I see happening around me and what other people tell me that they see happening around them. The info in the stuff you post is not consistent with what's happening around me and what other people tell me that they see happening around them. The viewers can decide whose info is consistent with what they see happening around them. edit ---------------------------------------------------- A lot more health professionals would speak out if it didn't mean risking their careers and retirement pensions. http://www.politicalforum.com/index...ury-and-autism.579730/page-15#post-1074970847
Yeah, sure you do. That's why every single time you get rebuttal, you tell us all how you're a layman, "just asking questions" and how you don't know the answers! Unbelievable spam. You see people getting cancer all around Madrid do you!? Chronic circular reasoning based on biased hearsay. Those are the most ridiculous grounds for a claim that anyone could make. And spam again. Let "the viewers" decide huh? At what point does even one single thing, in any one of the 50 or so conspiracies you've posted threads about, get acknowledged by you!?
I give English classes to hospital workers at their hospitals. Most of them don't even want to look at the info I try to show them. One of them is open-minded though. He says the cancer rate has increased because of the covid vaccine. He says he can't say that openly at the hospital. I've already told you about the guy who runs a health food store who knows doctors who say they've seen been a big increase in tumors since the vaccine roll-out. I think I'm in a better position to know what I've seen than you are. That goes for the viewers too.
Uhuh. So? Nope. That's just gullibility. And he is an expert in the field and tested every one of the people huh? Because it's a moronic and unproven statement. Chronic hearsay and assumption based on debunked hogwash. Sure, only a) I don't believe a single thing you say and b) you don't have the qualifications to understand it. Nope. Cancer increase has been attributed to the Sars2 virus! sars2 can lead to cancer - Google Scholar Maybe you think pretending not to see OBVIOUS and COPIOUS evidence that shows the actual cause can help you maintain this ridiculous conspiracy theory?
This info is from the mainstream. The mainstream is famous for lying. What's an objective person supposed to think when he or she sees info such as this? http://www.politicalforum.com/index...e-causes-cancer.622137/page-3#post-1075181067 The mainstream also says the covid vaccine is safe and effective and you say that too. http://www.politicalforum.com/index...e-causes-cancer.622137/page-4#post-1075209106 edit ------------------------------------- This is relevant. http://www.politicalforum.com/index...covid-and-the-vaccine.613477/#post-1075080122
And so it continues. One of THE most absurd reasons to dismiss large numbers of researched papers! Batshit conspiracy sites are the ones that do that. Your truly chronic circular reasoning is baffling. But you aren't! To answer, they would seek knowledge and acquire good understanding. They would look at it logically and assess how likely something is. Uhuh. Do you even know you're doing it? Circular reasoning. It's not impressive.
I guess we have to agree to disagree. The viewers can look at everything and come to their own conclusions.
I disagree with you on just about everything you've ever posted, I am guessing that unless they are a full-blown conspiracy theorist who believes any old guff, then the first thing they will notice is the blanket dismissal of ANYTHING inconvenient to your claims without any logic, objectivity or reason.
At the beginning of this video some experts talk. Mass Vaccination and CANCER VICTIMS - Part 19 https://www.brighteon.com/d019cf3f-ed3b-4526-abe7-8b74e96879ea
