"How to Stab a Jew" Video Going Viral On Palestinian Authority Site.

You should have an adult help you out sometime.

 

Which part of my sentence you have a problem with? I'll have my youngster daughter who is English major send you PM, explaining it

 

The consequences of what the US is doing which means not wiping out the brainwashed bloodthirsty lunatic savages that dominate the moslem world.

They would and will surely chop your head off as soon as they get rid of everyone higher on their list.

 

Excuse me but it sounds like you made the above up. I doubt any Jew would have showed you the above let alone been frustrated. Your "Jewish friend" trying to educate you on evil Muslims I find ridiculous. If this person as you said was your friend, he would have known better than to show you such a tape. More to the point, uh yah, its what we Jews do. Go over to gentiles houses and try convert them to Zionism. Right.

Give it a rest.

Yah yah, I know. You have gay friends and they show you films of straight people attacking gays and wait now, your black friends showed you tape after tape of blacks being beaten by police but wait, I know your Tibetan friends show you tapes about the Chinese invasion and on and on.

If you invite a Canadian over we can show you tapes of the war of 1812.

Excuse me if I pass on the self serving my friend is a Jew reference.

 

What he said about his so-called friend (allegedly a Jew but I doubt it) showing him a video with the intention of demonizing Muslims as a means to attempt to get him "on-side" strikes me as odd to say the least. I mean, friendships are predicated on shared interests. It therefore sounds more like a fantasy to me but it's possible I suppose. In any case, those arguing the case for Zionism on a much more fundamental level have historically only been too grateful to get powerful anti-Semites 'on side' which on the surface might strike one as being odd. However, when one considers the significant role anti-Semites played in helping the Zionists realize their ambition of creating the colonial-settler state predicated on ethnic cleansing, it actually makes perfect sense.

As you must be aware, Herzl approached Count Von Plehve, the sponsor of the worst anti-Jewish pogroms in Russia. In return for Von Plehve's help Herzl and other Zionist leaders offered to help guarantee Tsarist interests in Palestine and to rid Eastern Europe and Russia of those "noxious and subversive Anarcho-Bolshevik Jews" - in other words, to get rid of the people who wanted to fight anti-Semitism rather than capitulate to it. Von Plehve agreed to finance the Zionist movement as a way of countering socialist opposition to the Tsar.

Have you heard of General Jan Smuts? Well, he was somebody who played an important role in arguing for the Balfour declaration. More specifically he was the South African delegate to the British war cabinet, a close friend of the leading Zionist, Weizmann and a future South African prime minister. In fact, Zionist leaders like Herzl and Weizmann frequently compared their aims with the South African conception of a racially distinct colonizing population, and built close ties with South Africa. In his diaries, Herzl had explicitly drawn parallels between himself and the most prominent representative of British imperialism in South Africa, Cecil Rhodes.

The founding of a Zionist state is often justified as a response to the rise of fascism and to the horrors of the Nazi holocaust that exterminated 6 million Jews. But far from fighting against fascism, Zionists frequently collaborated with the fascists. In 1933, the Zionist Federation of Germany sent a memorandum of support to the Nazis. Later that year, the World Zionist Organization congress defeated a resolution for action against Hitler by a vote of 240 to 43.

Leading Nazis like Joseph Goebbels wrote articles praising Zionism, and some Zionists received Nazi funds. A member of the Haganah, a Zionist militia in Palestine, delivered the following message to the German SS in 1937:

"Jewish nationalist circles…were very pleased with the radical German policy, since the strength of the Jewish population in Palestine would be so far increased thereby that in the foreseeable future the Jews could reckon upon numerical superiority over the Arabs."

(Quoted in Lenni Brenner, Zionism in the Age of the Dictators, 1983), p. 99).

The Zionist movement went so far as to oppose changes in the immigration laws of the U.S. and Western Europe, which would have permitted more Jews to find refuge in these countries. In 1938, Ben-Gurion wrote:

"If I knew that it would be possible to save all the children in Germany by bringing them over to England and only half of them by transporting them to Eretz Yisrael [greater Israel], then I would opt for the second alternative."

(Brenner, above, p.149).

This philosophy was put into practice. As the author Ralph Schoenman notes in The Hidden History of Zionism:

"Throughout the late thirties and forties, Jewish spokespersons in Europe cried out for help, for public campaigns, for organized resistance, for demonstrations to force the hand of allied governments - only to be met not merely by Zionist silence but by active Zionist sabotage of the meager efforts which were proposed or prepared in Great Britain and the United States".

Historically Zionism has fed off anti-Semitism and still to this day it needs anti-Semitism in no small part, to sustain itself.

The dirty secret of Zionist history is that Zionism was threatened by the Jews themselves. Defending the Jewish people from persecution meant organizing resistance to the regimes which menaced them. But these regimes embodied the imperial order which comprised the only social force willing or able to impose a settler colony on the Palestinian people. Hence, the Zionists needed the persecution of the Jews to persuade Jews to become colonizers afar, and they needed the persecutors to sponsor the enterprise.

 

Once again, an ignoramus conflates Islam with modern Islamist terrorism.

 

Zionists do the same thing with Judaism and conflate it with their Fascist supremacist Hate
.............................................................................& thereby smear a valid & sensative Religion
It’s a Hate Monger thing – hard to understand
They and their adversaries relentlessly engage in the pathology in order to dehumanize
.................................................................................................. ........................... .the other


They conflate those things which are diametrically opposed to one another
They construct these Absurdities in order to rationalize their own Paranoia
And thereby Justify the Atrocities that soon follow in wake of such Psychopathy

Orwell talked about it: – to them 'War is Peace – Hate is Love – Slavery is Freedom'

They have been trained to it -
Theodor Herzl, the founder of modern secular Zionism expounded on how his movement
would use Hate to advance their cause. We see his proselytes here on PF - true to form
....................... ...as they are constantly pumping up its volume & using it Incessantly

This in no way Justifies the Horrors commited by Radicalized elements within the Moslem
community - It simply fingers the Genesis of the Pathology

I am always at a loss to explain how one sees HIS Hate any more clean & pure than his adversaries ?
Especially when it is HE that is occupying & dispossessing the other




.

 

I agree - Islam breeds Islamic terrorism. Was it not for Islam, we'd have no Islamic terrorism, and the world be so much better. Glad, you finally see the light.

 

Well islam happen to be dangerous when they are too many and start to take the quran to the letter... see sweden, how muslims don't stick well with swedish liberal atheists feminist world... there needs to be some more control on religion-driven crimes, they should be punished. But going as far as to say that islam breeds terrorists is lame c'mon... we had extreme left terrorists here without a single islamic man.

 

That was not what I said, I said Islam breeds Islamic, not just any terrorism.

 

That's like arguing the West breeds decadence, greed and debauchery.

 

It does.

 

And do you agree that the very ideas that hold the West together are responsible?

 

Your sentence is incomplete. Responsible for what?

 

See #236.