Again you post stuff from another site as if they were my words. Does everyone agree regarding economic policies? No, there are disagreements in all areas of life but here you go attempting to interpose words as if they came from me, and then throw around disparaging remarks about trolls and stupidity. I am stupid yet have to explain these most simple and fundamental principles to you. As a conservative though I truly have love and compassion for people and will not let denegrating comments sway me from my ideals. Though if you are insistant on petty name calling, I would ask that you take that behavior to the upper fora where that sort of thing Is the standard norm.
http://www.robynmackenzie.com/keyword/land/1/610243077_N68hK#610243077_N68hK It's a conspiracy. http://www.google.com/imgres?q=hori...the-curvature-of-the-earth-with-the-naked-eye lulz.
Im not interested in your links. Yes there are several elements based on speculation and conspiracy, the majority on empirical evidence.
The one and only where they are constantly debating theory, mathematics and science. That particular faq was written very quickly to give new people a sense of what was going on, but in no way represents universal opinion. If you were a little more patient and inquisitive you would have easily learned this on your own. And they are by no means the 'one and only' they are but a single cog in the intricate gear system which comprIses the developement of FET. So if you insist on employing banal expressions at least get them right, otherwise you are trolling.
A simple review of this thread will prove you wrong here. You are incapable of actually doing anything, you merely attempt and fail. Now you attempt to speak for everyone and have failed.
Perhaps you find the terminology amusing, however light does bend upwards. I will let you have a few last petty words, but I will not continue a conversation with you if you insist on trolling on these most excellent fora. Any fair minded individual would agree that it is you who have spoken complete nonsense since your debut here on this most excellent thread.
I've done QED, light most certainly does not bend upwards. Perhaps getting an education would help with your severely delusional perception on physics. Light does however bend around intense gravitational fields as it has been experimentally shown during eclipses. But since you don't understand gravity and claim it doesn't exist nothing is there to bend the light. I have a question, if the flat earth is accelerating upwards what is the terminal velocity of this flat cylindrical object in the vacuum of space? Why isn't the "imaginary" force of gravity becoming stronger with an increase to the velocity? Mathematically and physically we should all be gaining weight. Why aren't we? How do you explain 6.67 x 10^-11 N (m/kg)^2 constant between any two bodies of mass? How do magnets work?
You finally submitted a worthy post. Ill concede this point even with that little remark about my alleged dilusional world view. Light will bend upwards but this has nothing to do with gravitrons. No, even though the earth is accelerating we are not supposed to be gaining wieght. There are equations for this im certain of that, you seem to have discovered the FES site, if you want this equation you will have to find it there yourself. Tom Bishop or James are the leaders in that field so take from them. I would obtain it for you however I have been permanantly banned and access is denied on both of my terminals. There will be more than one equation. There have been experiments that have proven there is no curvature as well. Seeing how the equation you listed is essetially based around RET, I explain it as being logically inferior and nonsensical. I appreciate your question about magnets but what do you want to know specifically?
Guess what. Rainbow colored flying unicorns were proven. They have equations. A universe without rainbow colored flying unicorns is nonsensical.
Congratulations, people that believe in a flat earth superseded Bishadi's stupidity. Didn't think it was possible.
Yes the difference is that what you have posted is not a matter of interest or something undergoing investigatiion. You have implied that I have failed to produce. I have directed you as I cannot get the information from my bunker terminals as I have been banned and would have to infiltrate on an outside cpu under the guise of an alt in order to get the requested equations. Then you start ranting about unicorns and rainbows (interesting choice by the way) You have attempted to insult me through a sarcastic analogy and failed again.
I can't find any of there moronic equations or experiments on that site. Burden of proof is on you. I am not the fantastic idiot claiming the earth is flat.
Grammatical error and typos are understandable. Its just always amusing to me when they are coupled with calling someone stupid. Burden of proof? My friend its no burden. You have asked for these things, I explained a situation to you and let you know where you can find them and its not difficult to find them. You asked, if you were interested then there they are. But now we know youre really not interested, your inquiry was fraudulent and insincere. You attempted to to place burden....and failed. You also seem like a very angry little guy too. Why so much hostility buddy? Are you ok? Is the internet your way of telling people all the things you would like to in the real world but cannot do to passivity and lack of assertiveness? even your avatar suggests that things arent going right for you.
Go to the nearest public area and tell people you sincerely believe the earth is flat. Note their response. Now I will LULZ. Btw did you ever graduate high school? Because that'd be an anomaly.
Well as much as I would like to stay up all night and exchange insults with you I have been up for almost four days now and have to retire. Good night most gracious friend.
I have a few questions for you. How do you explain two high tides per day in a flat world? There seems to be only one explanation for the phenemon and it requires a spherical world. How thick is Earth? How does Earth have enough mass to keep the sun orbiting around it and yet not enough gravitational pull to cause the Moon to crash into the Earth? Is it possible to see the edge of the Earth?
According to Flat Earth Stupidity there is no terminal velocity in the vacuum. So... I am going to assume you believe the earth is ~10,000 years old. 10,000 years = 315,569,259,747s a = 9.8 m/s a = delta t / v 9.8m/s = 315,569,259,747s / v v = 3.09 x 10^12 m/s (Speed of light can go F*uck itself, it's all propaganda man CONSPIRACY physics!) distance traveled = 9.25 x 10^23 m = 1.03 x 10^8 light years. Ever been in an elevator? Ever driven in a car? Ever lifted off in an airplane? The force you experience is directly proportional to the acceleration vector. So if the speed limit didn't exist and it didn't take more than an infinite amount of energy to reach c than we would still be vaporized. And if we were traveling 10,315 times the speed of light, well light wouldn't be able to reach us or interact with any matter on earth. It be pitch black. There goes bendy light. not to mention G is still no where explain. That's the universal gravitational constant. problem? Maths no make sense to u?
Most respected friend, I appreciate your questions however if you would read the entire thread you would have some insight about most of the things you have mentioned. From there you will most certainly modify the questions you have presented. The pages are short and it wont take long.
I can see how he would counter this. The force of gravity is dependent on the distance from the source. Thus, it would not always have an acceleration of of 9.8 m/s^2.
