I want an explanation of this photo

Stop babbling about things in which you lack the training to speak authoritatively. Personal effects do survive crashes, if they are nhot exposed long enough to a hot enough fire. Not all of the identificatin documents were found at the Pentagon. Identifiable remains were found at the punch-out, shredded, but not burnt. All those green-painted metal objects are pieces of the aircraft.

Google cremation. A body had to be raised to a temperature well over a thousand degrees for about an hour to destroy DNA. The fire department was right there at the Pentagon.

Human bodies have two kinds of parts, squishy and brittle. Paper. clothing and shoes are fibrous and rather tough and WILL survive a crash in which they are not directly exposed to the fire for a long enough period of time.

 

You have clearly never been to, or inside the pentagon. It does not look like that. It is not made of bricks, but concrete. The concrete appears to have a wood grain because it was poured into wood. The blocks are considerably larger than bricks.

THIS is what the pentagon looks like, and is in fact where the plane struck and repairs made.


What is funny, is if this image were used to debunk something truther... it would be IMMEDIATELY noticed that this is not the exterior of the pentagon.

 

Bull (*)(*)(*)(*). Brick with a limestone facing.

 

Very interesting in a (*)(*)(*)(*)tarded sort of delusional way,


# Size of 757 matches the initial size of hole in the building - somewhere between 13 and 16 feet (757 is 13 feet wide/high)
# Rims found in building match those of a 757
# Small turbine engine outside is an APU
# Same engine has been clearly stated to not match a Global Hawk engine
# Blue seats from 757 laying on ground in photos
# Part of "American" fuselage logo visible in more than 1 photo
# Engine parts photographed inside match a Rolls-Royce RB211
# Structural components photographed in wreckage match Boeing paint primer schemes
# Large deisel generator in front of building hit by a large heavy object
# Large deisel engine outside is spun towards the building - could not be result of bomb blast or missile explosion
# Multiple eye witnesses say they saw an airliner
# Multiple eye witnesses say they saw an airliner hit the Pentagon
# 60+ bodies, matching the passenger list and flight crew roster identified and returned to families from Pentagon wreckage

http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread79655/pg1

 

The initial problem with this thread is that the OP uses a picture of the C-Ring punch out hole and states it is the E-Ring facade. Ignorance or dishonesty?

Video and images of area around the punch out clearly shows recognisable debris, such as a wheel hub, and even the remains of a tire. With the force of 120,000kg moving the speed of a bullet, it comes as no surprise some debris traveled all the way to the E-Ring.

Another misunderstanding is that there is no dividing walls between the E-C ring from the 2nd story downwards. The first and second floors, from E ring to C ring, is open office space. Then entire way. It's not until the third floor and above, that it begins to separate into rings, with dividing walls. AA77 hit the bottom two floors, majority on the first floor. Therefore, the airliner did not punch through 6 walls, but only 1. 2, if you count the tiny punch out hole in the C-Ring.

More images and evidence can be seen below;

http://therightbloggerbastard.blogspot.co.nz/