I want to create a large private city in middle america that can outright ban guns.

No one lives in ND lol, or Wyoming, or SD, or Montana so need not be a war lord.

 

Of course but its still worth looking at. That whole region has less gun deaths by terrorist group then the US has at home.

 

Cause it matters what you're killed with right. Personally I would prefer a bullet to the head over an IED.

 

Well yeah, there's places in SD so remote you think you will never get back to civilization again. But remember what was done to those Indians on the Pine Ridge Reservation when they started Ghost Dancing.

All those civic and business organizations in the Black Hills cities ain't going to stand for somebody coming in and upsetting the apple cart. Pierre won't stand for it either.

 

Simple: A lie of omission .
For every gun used to commit murder, 10 are used in self-defense.

 

Oh I should have said all together, Terrorist deaths in the middle east account for around 22K, and in the US gun deaths ate 33K

 

One shot fired and it would give the state militia an excuse to militarily occupy the neighboring state until the state government seeded more border lands to protect the state from harm.

Also we would have at-least 60% more if not several times more then they had.

 

The hilarity of our nonsensical assertion aside... You won't have a state militia.

 

Better rethink that...

 

And how do you plan on doing that without the blessing of the U.S. government and content owners?

 

You have some sources to backup the specious claim?

 

Well, considering that Syria has a population of 18 million (and ours is 325 million), we are pretty safe. Can you not do simple math? To do the math for you, our population is 18 times their populaiton.

 

And as soon as you tried that the U.S. military would step in and incinerate your and yours.

 

Almost a million in ND and a huge petroleum industry exists there, Wyoming has over a half a million living in the state and SD has almost a million in population, that's a lot of people for three states with no one living in them.

Then there are all of the national monuments located in those states which you will never be allowed to occupy or even get any form of development near.

You really need to get a clue and understand your dream world is truly a total impossibility.

 

Never mind half of the population of these states would make you disappear without a trace.

 

There is, after all, plenty of space to bury the bodies.

 

What blessing from the US government, we can have our own news channels

 

Sorry, the broadcast spectrum is all sold out, so that's a fail.

 

The state could just replace, Faux news and other right wing news sources with channels run by the state business. We need not air all those channels in the state.

 

WY-500K ND-600K SD-800K
We don't need to build up national parks or monuments since they are not industrialized.
Those "law abiding" fire arm owners would just respect the fact that we got our new state via the constitution no matter how forced it was. Unless they only like the 2A and they just pretend to care about the rest.

 

You have no control over what is aired and cannot build a CATV system without an FCC license.

 

Didn't Jim Jones attempt to create his own City/State where only the leaders had guns to police the masses?

 

Banning the reception of a news network by the government violates the 1st Amendment.
How could a well-educated, highly intelligent man of the works such as yourself not know this?

 

Nope. They'd take you federal court - and win.