Illinois teen arrested in fatal shooting at Kenosha protest, police say

That pretty much answered my question, so you are ok with racist coming over from another state to act cowardly and randomly shoot at folks.

 

Maybe it was a relatives store?

Doesn't matter why he was there.

Did he have a right to be there? Yeah. Did he have a right to defend himself? Also yes.

 

As good as he was, if he'd been shooting randomly, you'd have dozens dead.

They need to send this young man to Parris Island.

 

Lot of folks here will still call this 'murder.'

Filthy white gun nuts should lay down and take their licks for equality...

 

It's harder to tell if the first man who was shot was a self defense shot. Looks like the shooter kid shot is running about a car distance, at least, to look to see how wounded the guy he shot is. Unless that first guy was aiming a gun at the kid, it couldn't have been self defense.

 

It didnt answer your question at all.

What evidence do you have that he is racist? Or is this just another random accusation of racism without evidence? (Most likely)

I have no problem with him coming over from another state and being there, he has every right to be there and he has every right to defend himself against the morons who attacked him. He defended himself very well, and should walk.

He never randomly shot at anyone, I suggest you do some research on this as he never “randomly” shot at anyone.

Hopefully justice is served and he walks a free man, able to live the rest of his life happily after having to justly defend himself from violent leftists who cannot do the same, and its their own fault.

 

Is that why they arrested him, or is that going to be another deep state conspiracy

 

He will have his day in court, which is appropriate and not at all an indication of guilt.

And he should walk.

 

The militia at Lexington and Concord were comprised of males 16 and older. At 17 one can join the US military.

 

What difference does that make?

 

So 2 wasn't enough, are you saying he should have shot 50.

 

He should have shot as many as attacked him, which is exactly what he did.

He could have killed a lot more.

That's obvious from the video.

 

As opposed to those carrying accelerant, bottles, rags, hammers, and bats?

They are just going to peacefully protest?

**** these looters, and those that defend them.

These looters in the streets are the biggest losers in our society. They have never built a thing.

 

No.

We've seen multiple people get arrested for things and then found not guilty.

Do you think the judicial system is a conspiracy?

 

You asked "Why" I think a 17 year old boy shouldn't have been there. That was my answer. If he were your boy, what would you think about his decision about being there?

 

Think a little deeper. Think as a open minded common sense intelligent rational adult. Just because someone has the right to do something should they do it!

I know that I typed it and thought it was in this thread.

 

If the kid is a "white supremacist racist" going out to hunt down black men, then he was a pretty lousy shot. Looks like two out of three of the guys he shot were pasty white. Is black-on-black crime "racist"?

#2 and #3...

 

So this individual does NOT possess these constitutional rights?

1) The right to carry arms

2) The right of self-defense

3) The right to free speech

And further, those related to him must be silenced, shamed and punished?

Is this correct?

 

That’s how so many feel these days, its not everyone on the left...but there is a growing number for sure.

 

Indeed.

 

I don't think the first person he shot in the head was self-defense. It sounds like the first guy was looting a car dealer business. I'm not a lawyer, but I don't think I can just shoot someone if I witness them committing a crime, nor would I. That's why we have police.




https://thepostmillennial.com/three-shot-two-fatally-during-kenosha-riots

 

Well they have him on video, so he will need a very good lawyer to get him off.

 

So because he shouldn't have been there he should be beaten maybe even killed?

Terrible logic.

He was, if ifs and buts were candy and nuts we'd all have a merry Christmas.

 

Defending himself. Wouldn't take a great lawyer.

 

And the one guy did keep demanding he shoot him, so....