'indisputable proof' of obama forgery

Discussion in 'Other/Miscellaneous' started by CoolWalker, Jul 17, 2012.

You are viewing posts in the Conspiracy Theory forum. PF does not allow misinformation. However, please note that posts could occasionally contain content in violation of our policies prior to our staff intervening.

  1. keymanjim

    keymanjim New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2008
    Messages:
    10,351
    Likes Received:
    105
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Thinky up there posted the entire article and how the document he has provided is invalidated.
    That is to say, there is information on the document that shouldn't be there. And no notations that approve, or explain the addition of said information.
    As such, it is no longer a legal document. Not that it ever was. Because, if it were before it was altered, it opens another mystery of his origins.
     
  2. SFJEFF

    SFJEFF New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2010
    Messages:
    30,682
    Likes Received:
    256
    Trophy Points:
    0
    The only question is how much more money did WND and Zullo make from this show?
     
  3. SFJEFF

    SFJEFF New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2010
    Messages:
    30,682
    Likes Received:
    256
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I haven't gotten around to reading Zullo and WND's joint report- but I am wondering- who is Arpaio filing charges against?

    Has he referred this to the DA?

    I wonder this because last time I checked, County Sheriff's don't invalidate any state documents, and if there is evidence of fraud they should be maybe taking legal action rather than holding 'press conferences'.
     
  4. Montoya

    Montoya Banned

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2011
    Messages:
    14,274
    Likes Received:
    455
    Trophy Points:
    83
    So where is Sheriff Joke's "indisputable evidence?" People want to know what America's most corrupt sheriff has found!
     
  5. keymanjim

    keymanjim New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2008
    Messages:
    10,351
    Likes Received:
    105
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Nothing. Even the proceeds from his book goes to his church.

    No one. They were asked to investigate the matter, as is their responsibility to do so, and this is what they came up with.
     
  6. SFJEFF

    SFJEFF New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2010
    Messages:
    30,682
    Likes Received:
    256
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Maybe Joe should have spent more time figuring out who the federal agency is that he should forward any charges to, rather than just having Press conferences.

    Now I am no experienced law man like Joe is, but hmmmm what federal agency would I forward 'proof' that a President wasn't eligible?

    Who comes to mind?

    The Justice Department- natch
    The FBI- natch
    The Speaker of the House- natch
    The Hawaiian State Police- natch

    So why is Joe having a Press conference rather than actually pursuing this 'crime'? Why after all of these months is he still not actually doing anything?

    Why indeed.
     
  7. keymanjim

    keymanjim New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2008
    Messages:
    10,351
    Likes Received:
    105
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Fixed that for you. You're welcome.

    Scroll up and you'll see it.
     
  8. SFJEFF

    SFJEFF New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2010
    Messages:
    30,682
    Likes Received:
    256
    Trophy Points:
    0
    And I should believe that why?

    And WND is giving all of its proceeds to his church to?


    So Zullo and Arpaio wasted thousands of Arizona tax payers dollars in order to hold press conferences where they announce they might notify someone that someone might have done something wrong?

    Lol Birthers
     
  9. keymanjim

    keymanjim New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2008
    Messages:
    10,351
    Likes Received:
    105
    Trophy Points:
    0
    You can only go after whoever altered the document. It could very well be that obama doesn't know that the document has been altered. He was pretty young when the original was made up.
    All they know is that a crime has been committed. They just don't know by who.
     
  10. SFJEFF

    SFJEFF New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2010
    Messages:
    30,682
    Likes Received:
    256
    Trophy Points:
    0
    No...they say that they think a crime has been committed.

    Here is the problem- they haven't identified the crime, haven't identified the criminal or identified the victim.

    But they did have a grand show......and I am sure Zullo enjoyed his Hawaii vacation at taxpayers expense.
     
  11. keymanjim

    keymanjim New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2008
    Messages:
    10,351
    Likes Received:
    105
    Trophy Points:
    0
    In the absence of evidence to the contrary, I will take their word for it.


    Oh, there is no "might" about it. This irrefutably proves that the certificate that obama has provided is invalid.


    LOL yourself. We were right all along.
     
  12. rahl

    rahl Banned

    Joined:
    May 31, 2010
    Messages:
    62,508
    Likes Received:
    7,651
    Trophy Points:
    113
    did you even read the transcript?
     
  13. keymanjim

    keymanjim New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2008
    Messages:
    10,351
    Likes Received:
    105
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Forgery is a crime. That has been identified. The victims are all of us.
    Who did what is what must come next in the investigation.

    However, the fact still remains that the document obama has provided as proof of his domestic birth is invalid.
     
  14. SFJEFF

    SFJEFF New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2010
    Messages:
    30,682
    Likes Received:
    256
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Of course you take their word for it- Birthers lol
    Of course you think this re-hash of Birther claims is 'irrefutable proof'- I could have told you that you would 12 hours ago.
    Of course you think you were 'right all along'- meanwhile in the rest of the world- life goes on- Obama will be on the Arizona ballot- Arpaio is not sending his pile of dung to anyone- he will just sit on it- and WND will still flog this for as much money as they can.
     
  15. SFJEFF

    SFJEFF New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2010
    Messages:
    30,682
    Likes Received:
    256
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Of course it hasn't.

    This is Sheriff Joe and Deputy Fife we are talking about.

    Birthers lol.
     
  16. keymanjim

    keymanjim New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2008
    Messages:
    10,351
    Likes Received:
    105
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Of course it has.
    There is information in areas where there shouldn't be. That shows that the document has been altered. Which invalidates it.

    QED.
     
  17. SFJEFF

    SFJEFF New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2010
    Messages:
    30,682
    Likes Received:
    256
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Oddly enough when the Secretary of State of Arizona wanted confirmation of Barack Obama's place of birth- he asked the State of Hawaii- not Sheriff Joe.

    The State of Hawaii confirmed that the birth certificate is authentic and official.
    Sheriff Joe and his posse press conference was nothing more than a pre-ordained conclusion of Birther muck and has no authority or validity.

    Wake me up if Sheriff Joe ever tries to give this to the FBI or whether Boehner lets him on Capital Hill.
     
  18. SFJEFF

    SFJEFF New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2010
    Messages:
    30,682
    Likes Received:
    256
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Only in the very small minds of Birthers.
     
  19. toddwv

    toddwv Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 18, 2009
    Messages:
    30,444
    Likes Received:
    6,429
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Lol... like we didn't see this coming.

    Sheriff "Up For Election" Arpaio is again trying to claim that a document is a forgery by inspecting a digital copy...

    God, what an idiot and I laugh at the birther morons who continue to fall for this (*)(*)(*)(*).
     
  20. toddwv

    toddwv Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 18, 2009
    Messages:
    30,444
    Likes Received:
    6,429
    Trophy Points:
    113
  21. toddwv

    toddwv Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 18, 2009
    Messages:
    30,444
    Likes Received:
    6,429
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Lol. He just regurgitated all the birther nonsense over the past few years.

    If you "told us so" it's because you and your fellow birthers have been posting all this debunked crap over and over again.
     
  22. SFJEFF

    SFJEFF New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2010
    Messages:
    30,682
    Likes Received:
    256
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I think they repeated the number "9" alot....and Sheriff Joe admitted he couldnt' figure out who would care....
     
  23. scott e.

    scott e. New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2012
    Messages:
    2,154
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    heres a new shift in the paradigm, a guy at woodman's blog (Slartibartfast) says:


    July 30, 2012 at 3:23 pm
    Scott,

    The official record is not in a vault–it’s on a hard drive (plus other secure backup, I assume). In other words, the official record is data not a document. If you disagree with my methodology then explain how it is incorrect–otherwise I have described how one can arrive at the estimate of 0% empirically. What you or anyone else feels about it is of no significance whatsoever. Science isn’t about who proposed a theory or what others think about it–it’s about whether or not the theory is logically correct and stands up to an experiment with the potential to falsify it.




    i'm not sure if this means there is no certificate, or there was one. i thought there was an original in the book and perhaps on microfilm.
     
  24. scott e.

    scott e. New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2012
    Messages:
    2,154
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0

    what do you think of this ??

    http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2011/06/adobe-book-editor-obamas-birth.html


    you know, i listened to the gillar mara zebest tom harrison and john woodman debate and i don't think woodman overwhelmed anybody. i think woodman has been won over. his website is protected with snarky obots and he edits my comments like kevin davidson did before he banned me.
    no foul langauge, just limited speech (overmoderated).

    i would post this on woodman's forum, cause he's become sort of a friend, but he said wouldn't post anything with "obot" in it. now why is this army of obots trying to control the discussion ?? even flash mobbing on amazon to ridicule birtherbooks.


    why do they get so dramatically nasty when people dig into the "president's" past... that's always been the big red flag for me.
     
  25. mamooth

    mamooth Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2012
    Messages:
    6,490
    Likes Received:
    2,226
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Standard conspiracy crank behavior -- "They wouldn't mock me if I wasn't on to something!".

    Yes, they laughed at the Wright Brothers, but they also laughed at Bozo the Clown.
     

Share This Page