https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/worl...y-analysts/ar-BB16gWvI?ocid=spartan-dhp-feeds Ok first, this made me smile of course. Now the question is what happened here, accident or attack? Normally I would say attack when dealing with their nuclear program but they are just not having a good year so far so accident perhaps? Iran is a mess. From licking public walls during a pandemic to hitting their own ship with missiles and all the other blunders they had this year.
It was probably an attack. I don't see how an explosion could be an accident. I don't think that the Iranians would be dumb enough to leave explosive substances in the above-ground portion of their nuclear enrichment sight. The only question in my mind is who could have done this? The USA/CIA connection? Isreal? Those are the most probable sources, but who knows? Unlike terrorists, these organizations don't usually declare that they were responsible for an attack.
Iran is saying it believes it is a cyber attack and when they find out who is responsible there will be repercussions. Possibly the US throwing a temper tantrum after the business between Iran and Venexzuela? https://www.reuters.com/article/us-iran-nuclear-natanz-idUSKBN2441VY The Jerudsalem Post however is carryng a story suggesting it might be Israel who is responsible. https://www.jpost.com/middle-east/i...rattack-struck-natanz-nuclear-facility-633775
I'm sure not knowing won't stop them from throwing the blame though. Not that I would mind if it actually was us.
I'm sure those brave tough Iranian men who took the blame for it went home and beat their wives to make themselves feel better, at least if they were not executed for it.
Cyber attack or not ... nothing will stop the Ayatullas to gain Nukes. When it will happen those evil anti human rights supporters will rule the Gulf area.
NY Times reports it was not one but a series of three explosions in Iran in the last three weeks. Looks suspicious.
The usual suspects are of course Israel and the US and another blast was reported and denied West of Tehran yesterday https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-53362127 Israel is annexing a third of the land which was to have been the Palestinian State now because it believes that the Donald will be out in November and the next US President will not agree to Israel acting so much against International Law. It is not impossible that this is Israel trying to get its other desire implimented - the destruction of Iran and mass death of her people. From the beginning Iran said it would retaliate but it has not done so. A common tactic Israel uses is to provoke and provoke and provoke until its adversary replies and then to cry it is being attacked. Iran I think is also waiting and hoping Trump is out and some degree of law and sanity will return....but I would not bet on that. I suspect the American people having got so used to this with Trump will now allow all International Law and the UN to be ignored and for the entire world to decline into lawlessness. I hope I am wrong on that.
Israel is not annexing a third of the land which was to have been the Palestinian State now because the so called Palestinians have a huge state called Jordan. Jordan is Palestine, and even King Hussain knows his time is almost over .. the Palestinian mijority will take over the Hashamite Kingdom.
Israel is doing what I said. You are simply saying that you believe that after the Palestiians gave Israel 78% of their homeland in Oslo, something they did on the agreement that they would get a viable congruous state in return, you want Israel to take 100% of the 22% they had left not 30%. You will need to hope that the new American President like Trump is also prepared to give up International Law and that the world becomes lawless as you wish. With the Climate Emergency there will be no survival of any fittest this time.....but I guess that is what people who are after Rapture would want.
Article just out in the Guardian claiming Israel is responsible and that this would only be happening with the agreement of Trump. It also says the attack which started this thread was far more serious than Iran was letting on. https://www.theguardian.com/comment...ying-of-iran-is-bound-to-backfire-on-the-west My oh my what a peculiar event that is. The UK not going with the US and Israel. The article continues that the onslought by Israel and the US - sanctioning Iran even during a Pandemic, murdering her top military and on and on including the recenting bombs have not and will not achieve what they want. He points out that Iran has always said it does not want nuke bombs - that they are against Islam - something which Iranian Monitor moans about. The writer, which one should expect from the British Guardian nowadays is all for Regime Change in Iran but sensibly points out it has not worked and it will not work. Attack Iran militarily and Iran's people will forget any irritation they have with their Government and come together to protect their country. Most sensible people know that Iran would work well with the West if it were not for a little country called Israel and her actions against International Law. That being said Iran was acting in a way which suited most of the world after she signed the Iran Nuclear Deal which she was keeping but which the US on Israels demands did not live up to its word on....so he is aware that it is the US (and Israel) which has kept Iran isolated and unable to do trade and be involved in communications with Europe and the US Of course in this he is correct and the reneging on the International Treaty has massively increased this. He believes that unless there is change from the US in the next admin, then we can be sure there is going to be a massive confrontation which Iran will be happy to start. https://www.theguardian.com/comment...ying-of-iran-is-bound-to-backfire-on-the-west I really do not understand why the Trump Regime believed it would get a different result by trying the same thing. The very reason for the Iran Nuke deal was because it was known that Iran could build nukes in a very short time if she so wished. Obviously since the US reneged on the International Treaty Iran has been moving back on that and frankly from how she has been treated these last 40 years I am not sure if she will ever have any independence without them.
YOU should be throwing a "temper tantrum" at Venezuela - if you are concerned that this nation is heading down the Stalinist, Collectivist, Maoist path to ruin and death.
Ah still playing the card that these people are savages are we. The Europeans with their violence and virus's killed 55million out of the 60 million people of the Americas - one tenth of the people of the world. Then they called them savages, people who can be displaced and erased. People they claimed had never achieved anything despite their massive civilisations still their in their ruins after the genocide. They tried to pretend the Americas had no settled people and could be destroyed just like Israel does now with the Palestinians to support her on going 'cutting of the grass '(bombing to the stone age) and taking of their land. Like the Americas before the people of Palestine the Israelis would have us believe never existed and if they have their way that will be the situation soon, supported of course by the White Supremacists yet again. White Supremacists of the US have never given up on trying to destroy the indiginous people of the Americas. You are just trying to suggest another excuse - that they should be annilihated because they had the same economic system as the UK had before Thatcher and the US had with Roosevelt - a mixed economy.
No sorry. China gave Europe the plague via the Mongols - and killed two thirds of all Europeans. And the Mongols invaded China, Russia and Europe and killed eleven percent of all people on earth - DELIBERATELY. ps the Mongols deliberately shot plague bodies over the walls of cities with catapults to spread death. Europeans spreading plague in the Americas did not bring dead bodies over - it was spread because settles suffered it too. Yes, some native Americans WERE savages - read of natives who fattened some of their slaves for eating. Black supremacists don't know that and never will because it aint in the school texts. Lots of Europeans wanted to educate, clothe and convert native Americans - not eat them, or cast dead bodies into their camps. None of this has anything to do with the White White Male Imperialist Karl Marx who is the new god of Venezuela - with about 150 million deaths to his credit.