IRS says it will back away from facial recognition amid outcry

Discussion in 'Latest US & World News' started by Collateral Damage, Feb 7, 2022.

  1. Collateral Damage

    Collateral Damage Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2012
    Messages:
    10,535
    Likes Received:
    8,149
    Trophy Points:
    113
    IRS says it will back away from facial recognition amid outcry (yahoo.com)

    Having to provide more and more personal information to the government, including your face for 'identification' purposes serving what purpose? Besides the fact that many features can be distorted and changed, the government's two step further into citizen's privacy will expand, and expand, and expand....

    I am glad that the outcry was loud enough to have this reaction. But give it a year or two, and I'm sure they will find another way to get it through.
     
    Hey Now and MJ Davies like this.
  2. MJ Davies

    MJ Davies Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 4, 2020
    Messages:
    21,120
    Likes Received:
    20,249
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Hey Now and Collateral Damage like this.
  3. independentthinker

    independentthinker Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2015
    Messages:
    8,263
    Likes Received:
    4,645
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Big brother is doing everything they can to watch us.
     
    Collateral Damage likes this.
  4. Hey Now

    Hey Now Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 3, 2021
    Messages:
    17,788
    Likes Received:
    14,208
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Yep, an overstep currently averted. They don't need this for taxes and honestly, if they were networking with government and state databases, they likely already have access to the images regardless. I can see both side of this but I would err on the side of privacy everytime.
     
    Last edited: Feb 8, 2022
    Zorro and Collateral Damage like this.
  5. Zorro

    Zorro Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2015
    Messages:
    77,173
    Likes Received:
    51,842
    Trophy Points:
    113
    IT WAS A STUPID IDEA: The IRS: We won’t use facial identification tech after all.

    "The Internal Revenue Service has done an about-face on its plan to use facial recognition technology via a company called ID.me."

    "You'll no longer need to worry about needing to submit a video selfie to access irs.gov."

    [​IMG]
    Yeah, that's a big problem.
     
  6. HonestJoe

    HonestJoe Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Oct 28, 2010
    Messages:
    14,884
    Likes Received:
    4,862
    Trophy Points:
    113
    While there certainly risks and issues that should be (and aren't always) properly addressed, this feels to me like more of a knee-jerk reaction to scary new technology rather than a considered approach to best achieving all the (often conflicting) aims. The idea of unilaterally banning an entire class of technology (and probably anything spun up by the media or politicians to sound like it) just because it has security aspects to address is certainly a step too far. On that basis, they should just ban any kind of on-line submission of data to government services and force everyone to return to handling everything on paper and in person (at least until they remember the limitations and risks of that and pull yet another U-turn).

    It does seem a little odd to object to the IRS having personal data since they obviously need to know exactly who is accessing their services somehow and the people accessing those services are submitting vast amounts of personal data about their finances by definition. If you don't trust the IRS with facial recognition data, aren't you masking a much, much bigger issue?
     
  7. FreshAir

    FreshAir Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2012
    Messages:
    150,991
    Likes Received:
    63,256
    Trophy Points:
    113
    "We've asked ID.me, the company slated to provide facial recognition to the IRS, for comment. Under the plan, the IRS would have used the technology to authenticate users hoping to file taxes online or otherwise use the IRS' internet services. The approach was intended as a fraud prevention tool, and would have been available by the summer."

    would love to see a list of how many politicians bought this stock before the deal and sold before this was announced
     
    Last edited: Feb 9, 2022
  8. wgabrie

    wgabrie Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    May 31, 2011
    Messages:
    13,900
    Likes Received:
    3,083
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Facial recognition for the IRS should never happen. What are they going to do watch you from every CCTV camera when you get lunch and bill you for $4 because you bought a cheeseburger instead of paying them back for the money you owe to the IRS?
     
  9. Steady Pie

    Steady Pie Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2012
    Messages:
    24,509
    Likes Received:
    7,250
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    When applying automation to enforcement of your laws makes the application of those laws hopelessly totalitarian, maybe that's a time to rethink the value of some of those laws.

    So while I support prohibiting the government from using facial recognition now as a short term measure, it won't make a lick of difference unless we reform our extremely invasive bureaucracies.

    How do we do that? I don't know, people are too easily lead by consequences. I guess I'm saying I don't have much hope for the future and freedom loving folks are best off isolating themselves from society the best they can. Go rural and don't look back.
     
    Last edited: Feb 14, 2022
    Collateral Damage likes this.
  10. FatBack

    FatBack Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2018
    Messages:
    53,187
    Likes Received:
    49,541
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Boy, the left would really blow a rod if they wanted to use facial recognition to vote wouldn't they?

    By the time the idiotic and doped up masses wake up we will be firmly in a police state.
     
    Last edited: Feb 14, 2022
  11. Collateral Damage

    Collateral Damage Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2012
    Messages:
    10,535
    Likes Received:
    8,149
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Well said.

    Some people see a single goal, and a means to get there, disregarding the damage of the means to get there, the ripple effect, and the unintended consequences. Tunnel vision is alive and well.....
     
  12. Kranes56

    Kranes56 Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 23, 2011
    Messages:
    29,311
    Likes Received:
    4,187
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Female
    Good. Glad they got rid of it.
     
  13. Steady Pie

    Steady Pie Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2012
    Messages:
    24,509
    Likes Received:
    7,250
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    People are more guided by chemical reward centres in their brain than they would like to admit. Principle goes out the window for a few endorphins.
     

Share This Page