Is America too shallow to have a bald president?

Discussion in 'Political Opinions & Beliefs' started by Daybreaker, Feb 19, 2012.

  1. Daybreaker

    Daybreaker Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 23, 2007
    Messages:
    17,158
    Likes Received:
    140
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Don't get me wrong. I love America. But this bugs me about us.

    Are we so shallow and image-oriented in our culture that we couldn't handle the idea of a president without a full head of hair? Why is hair so important?

    In the age of television, could FDR have maintained a presidency from a wheelchair, even?

    I think we're a bit on the shallow side. This is something we should fix.
     
  2. Unifier

    Unifier New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2010
    Messages:
    14,479
    Likes Received:
    531
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I don't think it's as bad as a lot of people make it out to be. Charisma covers a multitude of physical flaws. That's why there are ugly sex symbols like Mick Jagger, fat ones like Barry White, and short ones like Prince. Hell, Sean Connery is old and bald, and he's still a sex symbol.

    People respond to charisma. You get a bald guy up there with the right charisma and presence and the people will vote for him. Jesse Ventura would have no problem getting elected if his views didn't alienate people. His appearance would be a non-factor.

    This is also why I don't think Chris Christie's weight would hurt him in a presidential race. He's got charisma to burn.
     
  3. kenrichaed

    kenrichaed Banned

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2011
    Messages:
    8,539
    Likes Received:
    128
    Trophy Points:
    0
    A better question would be, could we have a President with horrible teeth like Washington?
     

Share This Page