The male in the picture is clearly human. The unidentified dark-skinned female on the other hand looks more closely related to a primate of somekind. Homo Erectus is not Homo Sapien. This is the last time I will acknowledge one of your posts DA60. You're obviously black and I refuse to discuss racial issues with black "people." I don't see any point to it. You can have the last word like the child that you are.
1) I am white. 2) I see a pattern with you. You have zero facts to back up your racist theories...you just make things up to try and justify them. Like with your dealings with me. I am asking you questions that you clearly cannot answer - so instead of acknowledging that..you make things up so you can ignore me. Clearly, my truth causes you fear. That is the things about racist people...they cannot stand much inspection of their theories. Because when they do - their arguments fall apart. But don't worry - I will still point out to everyone the obvious flaws in your theories - not that they cannot see them for themselves. Have a nice day.
What theories? Zook, like myself not only provide you with all kinds of statistical facts showing the criminality of blacks, but both he and I have experienced the black factor of them mixing in with WHITE people, and it just doesn't work. So if there are flaws anywhere here, they come from the blacks themselves and from apologists and blind people like yourself who have no clue as to the destructive nature of mixing a group of backwater people who fail to evolve from a jungle mentality, and whose greatest contribution to America is in keeping racism alive with their foolish entitlement demands as a minority. What the blacks as a whole have failed to do or accomplish as Americans is in learning how to assimilate to our culture. They are in fact no more advanced than the millions of illegals who fail to or refuse to assimilate here in America. So all these cultural problems you see in the black communities will never be remedied regardless of if they do the right thing in segregating from the WHITES, since the WHITE man taught them and gave them plenty of opportunities to advance and succeed via integration, but the lazy blacks blew it by settling for free-be's, handouts and cradle-to-grave bennies and pushing the race card to its limit. So now they (blacks) need to go it on their own, and the best way for them to start is to segregate themselves from we WHITES and from a society they absolutely abhor.
Sorry but I can say the same thing for those who defend blacks and believe there isn't a big problem with them in the US and around the world for that matter. According to every single published government report on crime such as this: http://www2.fbi.gov/ucr/cius2009/data/table_43.html Again its pretty clear that blacks commit the most crime relative to their population size in the US. The fact is that I have yet to have anyone defending blacks come up with similar statistics that show whites/asians etc committing more crime than blacks do. Seriously you say you want facts to backup arguments that say blacks are violent, you got them EVERYWHERE. If you look at the top 50 countries leading in murders, all but one of those 50 are either South American or black countries. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_intentional_homicide_rate Where are the facts/statistics for the counter argument that the average white/asian person commits as much crime as blacks do? Please show me as I'd honestly really like to see.
Does pigment cause crime? No! CRIME in this country, regardless of who commits the crime, is the problem. Is "white crime" ok then? Poverty causes crime more than race.
How quickly you overlook the topic here of is black crime an epidemic in America. Perhaps you could start a new thread by showing us via statistics how it is that a greater percentage of blacks are poorer than the WHITES according to population proportions. Find out why it is that a good percentage of blacks are less intelligent and poorer than WHITES. When you find out those reasons for the plight of the black man, then report back to us of how the black problems are a direct result of WHITE man's keeping them down in this multi integrated racist society that has no symphathy for the less fortunate in this doggy dog world.
Do you people even read the posts? I said nowhere that 'whites' commit as many crimes per capita as 'blacks. Of course they don't - because they are FAR wealthier per capita. My question was: 'I am still waiting for the unbiased, factual evidence that 'blacks' - no matter what their economic background - enjoy beating, maiming and hurting people?' And guess what? You can't.
Where is your unbiased, factual proof that 'blacks' are more intelligent then 'whites'? And 'blacks' are poorer then 'whites' because the latter had a 200 year economic head start...duh.
Too late. After 40 years, interracial marriage flourishing http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/18090277/ns/us_news-life/t/after-years-interracial-marriage-flourishing/ America is becoming one big melting pot more every day. And, as a white guy, I think it's great. Everyone will be 'mutts'.
What is this your attempt to be sarcastic? What are you talking about? Blacks were living here in America throughout our colonial days. What does when blacks arrived here have to do with drive or lack or drive to pick themselves up off their arses and make something of themselves? Stop making excuses for them.
I take it that means you have none...so your words on that point mean nothing. Have a nice day in the ever growing melting pot of America.
I'm glad you can at least acknowledge that whites commit less crime than blacks. BUT if wealth was the main reason for the higher crime rates among blacks, then why is it that the hundreds of millions of Chinese and Indians who live in FAR WORSE conditions than any black American ever has in the past several decades, still commit so little crime relative to those blacks who in comparison are living like royalty? Heck why not include all the poor asian countries in the pacific too? So many that don't have even a toilet or clean drinking water running into their ghetto shacks, yet their kids still manage to grow up being far less violent than blacks of practically every black nation on the planet. Why is this? If wealth is the main cause of violence, then shouldn't a ton of countries in Southeast Asia have exploded in violence decades ago the way it has been going on in Africa for so long? But yet this hasn't been the case. Why? I'm not saying there hasn't ever been violence in Asia, but the point is it eventually died down and the people in that region now live relatively peacefully and are now slowly growing in prosperity. How many countries in Africa have lived in peace for any amount of time? Very few. How many predominately black nations have grown in prosperity on their own? Even fewer. I think that while lack of wealth plays a part in crime, parenting and the enviroment and people that kids are raised in/around matter more and in this area, blacks fail MISERABLY.
First show me the statistics that proves that the poorer sections of the countries you speak of have far lower violent crime rates then American poverty areas - and then I will comment about it.
If not for the NFA of the 1930's there would be roving gangs of black yoofs on the back of Toyota Trucks & Old Landcrusiers with "Mounted" heavy Machine Guns .
I didn't claim any of that. I claimed that pigment does not cause crime, culture did. Is it not possible that socio-economic status causes these crimes. Not race.
Not really, no. Socio-economic status only explains robberies and crime-to-survive. Black rape, black murder and black aggravated assaults are all through the roof. Poverty causing crime is a weak and simple argument. Read my latest thread - http://www.politicalforum.com/race-...se-astronomically-high-black-crime-rates.html
The negroes found out that the world "racist" doesn't have the same effect as it once did...now were mentally ill hahahahaha... The history of psychiatry is full of examples of people being labeled as ill for social or political reasons.This is why those whom society and psychiatrists wish to destroy, they first label mentally ill....
I never gave it much thought, but genes do pass on through families,you do not think some people tend to be more violent then others due to genes? You do not think that is possible at all? I am not saying I am correct, only that it would seem to make sense...If some people seem naturally passive, could not others be more aggressive? What do you think?,,,possible? Black Labs for instance are good watch dogs,but not guard dogs, the reason is their natural temperament is not an aggressive one....I am not trying to put down anybody, I am trying to make sense of it... We are all individuals, but we do carry the genes of our parents... This could make an interesting discussion. Is temperament passed down to people..just like with animals..
There is no difference between the native instincts and proclivities of any group. Culture makes all the difference. Not all cultures are equal. Quite frankly, things are going to get much worse for African Americans unless they can figure out a way to restore the Black Family. Until that happens, there is no hope.
First of all, I don't think such statistics exist or I'd almost guarantee that they would show the poor of asia is much less violent than the poor of America or any black nation. Second you can deduce it just from looking at the statistics that are available. For example look at the murder rates. I think you can safely assume that at least 75% each of China or India's populations are still living in deep poverty far worse than black Americans are. So even if you take 75% of 1.33 billion of China's population and 75% of 1.2 billion of Indian's population, you would still end up with lower murder rates than what you would have from the US even though you include rich, average and poor Americans. So if you have practically double the murder rate with every American included, doesn't it stand to reason that the US murder rate with just the poor alone would be higher? So how about YOU provide some statistics to backup your arguments for a change? Because frequently trying to squeeze some facts out of people who defend blacks is like trying to ask religious people who keep saying God exists to prove it. Its nearly impossible. They'll just keep telling you provide facts to backup your arguments without providing proof of their own to backup their beliefs.
Then people are just making fact less claims and their words (on that subject) mean nothing. Just the meaningless nonsense spewing from ignorant racists.
