"Is there something wrong with lesbians?"

Reading this story about Lorde and Taylor Smith brought this question to mind.



http://celebrity.yahoo.com/news/lor...thing-wrong-lesbians-175000293-us-weekly.html

While many people have a revulsion to gay men having sexual relations I've found that many men and women find the thought of lesbians to be erotic and appealing.

So what's your opinion? Do you have a different feeling about two women making love that you do about two men making love? If so why?

http://celebrity.yahoo.com/news/lor...thing-wrong-lesbians-175000293-us-weekly.html

 

Of course I do, that's just human nature. Gender and sexuality just happen to work that way.

That's all conceptual though. As far as what other real people choose to do and who they do it with (assuming all consensual and no spooking the animals) I really couldn't care less.

 

Love Lordes responses in the email.

In regards to lesbians versus gay men together- as a heterosexual, I like women. Two women together is just twice the visual pleasure- rationally I know that they could care less about me but that has nothing to do with it.

I am not attracted to men- two men together doesn't do a thing for me.

I can't explain why any woman finds lesbians together attractive. Of course sometime I feel like women are willing to put up with men's hairiness and odd extruding genitalia just because they adore our personalities......

 

Taylor Smith eh? Lol

 

If Taylor Swift and Lorde hook up, I will recant my atheism and praise holy Jeebuz.

 

Well a lot of women have an attraction to other women, so its not that odd.

 

I can't say for women, but as a guy they create two very different biological reactions in your body. It's not quite as strong now that I'm older, but when I was a teenager it was extremely intense. I'll never forget seeing girl on girl porn for the first time when I was something like 14. It was the hottest thing I had ever seen. I didn't fully understand it on a logical level, but on a hormonal level all I knew was that I loved it. Conversely, even the idea of two guys doing something as mundane as kissing created an equal and opposite biological reaction in my body. My dick went limp and my stomach felt sick.

I've theorized about this since and come to what seem to be plausible conclusions, but there's really no telling how accurate they actually are. I could be way off. What I surmised was that evolutionarily, the idea of two women probably amps up arousal because it means more mating potential. Since sex is biologically designed to propagate the species, it would make sense that sex with multiple mates at the same time would produce a greater chance of producing offspring and thus would require more arousal to sow twice as many seeds. And two women together instinctually implies sex with both.

Conversely, man on man sex does not propagate the species. Thus it is a waste of seed and energy. And because it does not drive the species forward in terms of reproduction, it creates a natural repellant feeling. Like trying to put two south poles of a magnet together.

Anyway, that's my take on it.

 

Interesting theory, because at first, I thought it came down to hetero men enjoying two women getting it on, and vice versa. Except even many women don't find two guys doing it appealing, so your theory may hold some weight.

I'm the same way about seeing two of the same gender together. I have no issue with homosexuality on a moral level, but two guys, especially big and hairy ones, doing it together just repels me. I don't know why.

 

I've met a lot of women that are bi-curious but not necessarily willing to act upon it. For example one expressed the feeling that she would enjoy being intoxicated and having another woman "take advantage of her" but would never do that sober. She desired the experience but didn't want to be personally responsible for making it happen.

 

Consensual sensuals is not a concern for me, unless I'm one of them.

 

ahhhhhh blessed is the Almighty Alcohol.............. But you're right. Alcohol lowers the inhibition and allows a person to do what they'd never admit to sober. Alcohol is the original cause of cognitive dissonance, you say and do things you know are wrong.

 

I voted for "Couldn't care less because it's none of my business".

Girl-on-girl porn can be intense (if they're hot) but I don't see what it has to do with lesbian relationships. I have to admit that I'm seeing a clear double standard already in this thread: "Girl-on-girl is fine because it turns me on, guy-on-guy isn't fine because it turns me off." This message couldn't be more explicit, and I don't think that an erection should decide social policy. Since straight men are the people with social, political and economic power, it's no wonder that criminalization of homosexuality is mostly focused on men.

 

To follow up on this- I think what it shows is that straight guys tend to be really threatened by gay men, but women tend not to be as threatened by lesbians.

This is I believe why there are so many threads by men, against homosexuality- but when they say homosexuality they usually mean gay men.

 

While I voted #3.... there really is something wrong with many of them.





Is it because they're lesbian? Probably not.
Is it because they're hateful, angry and stupid? Absolutely.

 

Well that applies to sooooooo many others. I imagine that Lesbians have as big of a share as heterosexuals do.

 

I avoid lesbians that act like Angry White Guys, but it's not a gender issue for me.

 

I avoid angry people in general.
And I avoid people (of any gender, ethnicity, or stated sexuality), who are jerks, mean-spirited, abusive, and/or overly-demonstrative.

What people do in the privacy of their own bedrooms, as long as they aren't hurting anyone, is their own business.

If somebody harms a child in any way however, and/or sexually abuses a child?
They should be killed on the spot.
I have no use for sexual predators and child molesters.

 

Probably. But I got bigger fish to fry than worry about gays.

 

I avoid all "Angry White Guys" regardless of gender or race. LOL

 

Lesbians = HAWT!

Gay guys = NOT!

 

Bear with me.

Men are perverts and want sex. Women want love and romance and want to build a nest.
Women temper male sexual deviancy by providing an outlet for it.
If there is no female to temper male sexual deviancy, there is no control over it and you have San Francisco, where the walls on the street smell like ejaculation and every elevator has had to strange men who met via "gay apps" having anal sex in it.
Yes, I am more grossed out by men doing this, because I may have to press a button in that elevator which might have had a finger that was just pulled out of an anus on it. Women, on the other hand, don't generally feel the desire to have sex 8 times a day and lesbian sex generally does not involve fecal matter. Also, lesbians do not spread HIV, gay men do. So, my opinion is a rational one, based on public health concerns.
When you think of San Francisco, ancient Greece and Sodom and Gomorrah, you aren't thinking about women.

I dated a man once who anted me to watch "girl on girl" action in a porn. I said "Sure, if we can also watch 2 men doing it." That shut the little perv up.

As for your sig, wasn't it the democrat party who were the slavers, segregators and opposers of the civil rights movement???????? MLK was a republican.

 

Seems to be a rather misanthropistic opinion.

I've never really notices a difference between the desire of men and women when it comes to sexual relations, love, and romance.

What I have found though is that based upon many religious beliefs there are men that believe the women are a "lesser person" than a man. Sen Rand Paul recently implied this when he blamed former President Clinton for the sexual relationship he had with Monica Lewisky when she was the one that initiated that sexual relationship. Sen Paul reflected a belief that Lewinski was too stupid to make up her own mind when it came to having a sexual relationship with the President.

Of the women I've known that were lesbians it is probably this "second-rate" status that men relegate them to that they find most repulsive. They don't like being treated as chattel by a man and prefer to make love with an equal.

 

I've had a grudge against dikes since I had a run in with one in a bar in the (*)(*)(*)(*)hole town of Barstow California. The jukebox was loud so I tapped her on the shoulder. to let her know her purse was spilled out all over the floor, then she copped an attitude. I told her where her and her purse could go, then she had the nerve to get in my face, but had a change of heart when I told her Id treat her like a man if she came at me like a man.

 

A person should never establish prejudice against a group based upon an anecdotal incident

 

To be honest, it actually depends on the lesbians in question.. If they're hot, I'm actively supporting them, if they're mediocre I don't give a damn, if they're ugly, I just don't want it near me.