..It is with a heavy heart and a clean conscience...

Exactly. I have no hatred of Jews. Some of my favorite people are Jews.

But I think every person that calls themselves a "Jew" politically needs to
read Gilad Atzmon's book "The Wandering Who".

But most will not as they will be stopped in their mind controlled tracks by
all the defamation that has been thrown at this author.

.

 

I am aware that the wandering who has got the support of some unexpected people like Richard Falk. It appears to see Jews as some kind of Borg and in that from my point of view is antisemetic. I read him discussing this with some Jews who strongly work for Justice for the Palestinians. He claims he is not antisemetic. The end result of the conversation was that if he was not then he is certainly promoting it by his stereotyping of Jews. Whether it is true of you or not believing what he writes tends to lead to antisemitism.

He seems to have caused a rift within the Pro Palestine movement - and Palestinians by the way do not support him. Hence he is reducing the effectiveness of those working for Justice for the Palestinians and hence helping Israel. One review of him suggested that what he is really expressing is the views he was brought up with and the people he was surrounded by and that is far right Israeli ones. I have not read him myself. It was sufficient to become aware from reading some passages of his stereotyping of Jews always being out for themselves for me to believe that his writing if not intended antisemetism will encourage it.

 

To somebody who has a wonderful grasp of English... this rehashing of history based on a man who wants to make a living selling a book is akin to a <male'dire = bad description> of returning the empty garbage can that the municipality truck has just emptied.

Anti-Semitic and HBendor are written this way Mascal'zone =pant less Scot.

BTW there is no such a thing as <Palestinian> none whatsoever, for there was never an <Independent Palestine> in history but of course just in the mind of a retrograded Scot.

 

Rubbish BS -

Texas is not " Independent " does not mean there are no Texans.? Sicilians ? Bavarians?
Burgundians ? Basque ? Andalusians ? Walloons ? etc. etc... ?




There was no such thing as "Israelis" Before 1948 - creation of the ZioNazi state called "Israel" -

 

None of your silly examples were ever independent so your point is what exactly? Palestine became a recognized state only recently and, if it is occupied it is still not independent or, is it not occupied and independent?



'Zionazi,' like the Zionazis are putting every last Palestinian on a death train bound for some extermination camp in Jordan. How many millions of Palestinians have the 'Zionazis' exterminated using their arsenal of complete modern weapons that they can, at any given time, completely obliterate every last one of them - one, two three or all five million of them in the territories? Golly, as soon as you lose reality your argument is revealed for the idiocy it really is. Say, did you ever find the proof that Hoess was tortured or have you finished running with the Holocaust denying Jew hating crowd?

 

And what do you think; the pro-Israeli journalists you keep quoting are writing for free, or are they getting well paid for their submissions? Oh, and by the way, there was never an 'Israeli' for 2000 years.

 

- I detect a Troll.



----- Gai avek - Tata....

 

Calling another a troll is a common panic reaction when a point made is not able to be countered. Oh, please use English according to the rules of the forum rather than your home tongue.

 

No................. Israel was there all the time in the minority but NEVER in Jerusalem where they were alway a majority...
The history of 2000 Israeliless home has been overturned and the country flaunts 9 million this past Rosh Hashana.
PSSSSSST we are doing a lot better than your Poland!

BTW there is hunger in Egypt today... the people are malnourished have anemia and who knows what will happen.

 

wrong, Jews only became a majority in Jerusalem in the 1850s.

 

.

You really should read his book.

By repeating these twisted defamation type comments YOU are acting as a member of the Borg.

Capiche ?

.

 

Why should I waste my money on a book I have been given every reason to believe is antisemitic and I have read enough snips of to be sure - just don't use that as an excuse again to try and show you are not!!

As it happened I did a bit more searching about him. Seems he calls every antisemitic canard there is including of course that there is no antisemitism. I also discovered that the more intelligent who like his writings do not for a moment suggest what he is saying is correct, merely that it makes them think....what we have though is all those classic antisemetic canards being given to antisemite people telling them they are not antisemite - you can fool some of the people some of the time but you cannot fool all the people all the time.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gilad_Atzmon