Perhaps, if people of color are whitewashed so they think and act like white people. But then they would have abandoned their real identity in order to be something they're not meant to be.
Furthermore, this study only sampled 10 Uyghur individuals but the first study I cited (Xu et al. 2008 ) is the most comprehensive study so far on the Uyghur (UIG) population, which collected DNA samples from 40 Uyghur individuals. I also downloaded the paper titled "Mapping Human Genetic Diversity in Asia" (The HUGO Pan-Asian SNP Consortium 2009) that you cited in the first post in this thread but its sample size is much smaller with less than 10 Uyghur individuals, thus missing out on blue-eyed Uyghurs who are genetically up to 80% European.
Please stop cherry picking images. Your study could have 1000 Uyghurs and still be worthless since it only compares Europeans and not Central Asian Caucasoids. When including Central Asian Caucasoids Uyghurs cluster towards them, and not Europeans, as one would expect after a second of thought.
Whites have been ingenious? You bet! Let's look at the Dark Side of their creativity: Atomic Bomb & it's use; Most Chemical & Biological Weapons; slaughter of Native Americans by Colonial Imperialists; "Subjugate or Exterminate!" Slavery for Economic Reasons; Wars & Conquests for Resource Exploitation (3% of World's Population - - consuming 25%, of World's Resources), Paranoia - Japanese Internment Camps; Influential, "White," America, has - - in essence - - created a Warfare State. Little or no growth without the MIC. RW Extremists - - mostly White - - just love the Military approach of, "Shock & Awe!" Was the Fuhrer a Dark Skinned Man? Mussolini? Joseph Stalin? Robber Barons of the Gilded Age - - many of which - - needed to be, "trust-busted?" Further, tough to find men of dark skin that can Steal like White Politicians, Big Banks; and the mostly White - - Wall Street Crowd. Three White Presidents have brought this Nation to it's Financial Knees: Nixon, Reagan; and, Bush II. (See Stockman's Book). Haven't really started - - really! One needs to keep in mind that the Power to Create; also, carries with it; the Power to Destroy! And, destroy they have - - those exalted, White Men of Yours. So greedy, so cunning; and so manipulative. Yet, for all their alleged, "Smarts;" the White Race has/is committing Suicide - - in essence. They sold out the notion of Family; for the pleasures of spending their income, the governments; and, the Young - - for Generations to come. Whose responsible for our $18 Trillion Dollar Debt? Our Bankruptcy: White or Dark Skin? The White Race has stepped over a lot of Bodies throughout the Ages; and, there is little sign that anything is going to change much, any time soon! Look what the Rich Whites have done to America's Middle Class? Economic annihilation! And . . . so, very much more!
Figure 2. Principal-Coordinate-Analysis Representation of the Allele-Sharing Distance This 2009 HUGO study does not deviate much from my previous conclusion if you compare A with Figure 2. CEU stands for Utah residents with Northern and Western European ancestry and Uyghurs (CN-UG) are plotted somewhere between CEU and East & South Asians. There is some sense of genetic continuity from Western Europeans to Indians and Indians to Uyghurs as well as Uyghurs to East Asians because neighbouring tribes historically interbred with each other. Modern Europeans harbour up to 20% of Ancient North Eurasian (ANE) ancestry because Siberian tribes with Haplogroup N migrated to Scandinavia and Eastern Europe and mixed with European hunter-gatherers (i.e. Saami). Another important finding from this study is the varying degrees of Austronesian admixture in East Asians. It's very low in the Japanese and Korean populations as the Korean sample has 1-2% Austronesian DNA, while the Japanese samples have 2-3%. But Chinese populations are up to 45% Austronesian and the presence of Denisovan DNA was detected in Chinese samples in a previous genetic study by a Swedish team.
Right, because that's all anti-Whites ever do. Now imagine what would happen if the twisted inhumane non-Whites commanded that kind of power.
Historical Facts speak for themselves. Of course, one is always free to stay in a state of Denial; or, attempt to Re-write History; which Karl Rowe and his Band of Merry Men; attempt to do everyday; aided, and abetted by America's Super-Rich Nazis. Fascism is alive and well in Wichita - - don'tcha, know?!
Wow! How anti-white can you get? This whole post is just argument #2 of Bob Whitakers list of the 5 anti-white arguments. #2 "Every evil in history can be traced in some way to this white race that doesn't exist." There is one bald fact, white's are targeted for elimination by forced immigration and forced assimilation. It's Asia for Asians, Africa for Africans and white countries for everyone. This is a genocide policy. "Article 2 In the present Convention, genocide means any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such: •(a) Killing members of the group; •(b) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group; •(c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part; •(d) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group; •(e) Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group. " http://www.hrweb.org/legal/genocide.html
The first wave of the white race arrive in Europe around 45,000 years ago and these U4 and U5 tribes survived the last Ice Age and the warming that started around 10,000 years ago. Around 7,500 years ago, Northern Europe was gradually invaded by Middle Eastern farmers with haplogroups R1a and R1b. There is some archaeological evidence of intermarriages between immigrant agriculturalists and local hunter-gatherers and blue-eyed hunter-gatherer women sometimes married into the farming communities, while no genetic lines of farmer women have been found in hunter-gatherers, which shows that European hunter-gatherers did not welcome the newcomers from the Middle East who introduced agriculture and farming. Viewed from this historical context, it's understandable that blue-eyed Americans of hunter-gatherer descent are very reluctant to accept brown-eyed and dark-skinned immigrants. America and Russia are known as the top two destinations for immigrants looking for economic opportunities and millions of immigrants from the former Soviet Union have been entering Russia for the last twenty years. When the size of a particular immigrant community exceeds one million people, it's generally detrimental to indigenous inhabitants and Britain is recently restricting Indian immigrants by refusing to issue visas to potential Indian migrants and the nearly 800,000-strong Polish community is increasingly targeted by UKIP with the threat to withdraw from the EU.
Nobody is trying to "re-write history". We just point out that anti-Whites only talk about history which reflects badly on Whites and ignore not only the often much worse history of other races, but the ongoing heinous crimes of non-Whites, such the Jewish campaign of demonising Whites by cherry picking stories and creating a false picture.
So you are saying Europeans don't want to be wiped out through mass immigration because 7,500 years ago Europeans resisted an immigration (bizarrely of people with brown eyes as if that's true or relevant)? Isn't the flaw in this reasoning that nobody wants to be wiped out through immigration and every country on Earth opposes mass immigration except the Jew brainwashed West?
It's always great when civil rights "leaders" like Al Sharpton talk about how white men owe them for slavery, while conveniently not mentioning that Africans STARTED the whole thing. It was a common practice in tribal warfare to kill or enslave all members of a conquered tribe to eliminate any chance of retaliation. These African tribes sold their slaves to Europeans. The way many people tell it, you'd think that white people were enslaving free African people
It was mainly Arab traders who shipped 12 million Africans to the Americas and North African pirates also abducted and enslaved more than 1 million Europeans between in a series of raids in Southern Europe. The North African Arab tribal groups with an Arab ethnic identity emerged as a result of the Arab conquest of North Africa and Arab soldiers subsequently intermarried with local black women. Caliph Umar commenced the first invasion of North Africa in 647 and by 709, all of North Africa was under the control of the Arab caliphate.
Hollywood produced "Souls At Sea" in 1937 about Gary Cooper as an abolitionist. If I recall correctly there was one scene where the white Americans were shown chasing blacks through the jungle to capture them. The implication was that no native Africans were selling their fellows into slavery. In another scene the American slave ship is caught by the British navy. To get rid of the "incriminating evidence" of slave trafficking the white Americans got all the slaves on deck, chained together in a long line then pushed them over boards to sink and drown. How anti-white can Hollywood get?
Mauritania straddles North Africa and sub-Saharan Africa where slavery has long been institutionalized along racial and cultural lines. The country is comprised of mainly three distinct groups including Bidan, Arab-Berbers who comprise about 30 percent of the population and hold the majority of wealth and political power. Bidan are typically slave owners; Haratine, a distinct group of African descent, are the slaves. Haratine are considered the lowest class regardless of an individuals unofficial status as slave or free man. Haritine comprise around 40 percent of the population. Afro-Mauritanians, black Mauritanians who are not decedents of slaves and do not speak Arabic, comprise about 30 percent of the population. Mauritania, officially abolishing slavery in 1981, was the last country in the world to do so. On paper, the 2003 Law Against Trafficking in Persons and Law 2007048 guarantee that people are protected from human trafficking, but in reality the deeply rooted social structure based on slavery remains the main cause of human trafficking. Few slaveholders in the country have been convicted, and those who have are often released from prison only months later. While it is difficult to know the exact number of individuals enslaved in Mauritania, according to estimates, the country has the highest prevalence of human trafficking and slavery in the world, with 4 percent of the total populationroughly 155,600 peopleenslaved. Mauritania is also listed on Tier 3, the worst ranking that a country can receive for human trafficking, in the U.S. Department of States Trafficking in Persons report. Tier 3 is reserved for [c]ountries whose governments do not fully comply with the minimum standards and are not making significant efforts to do so. http://dailysignal.com/2015/01/27/anti-slavery-activists-imprisoned-mauritania/
The point is that slavery still exists in some North African countries which are controlled by Arab-Berbers whose ancestors were responsible for trafficking 13 million slaves including 1 million white slaves. Whites were solely blamed for slavery in the past but it was Arab-Berbers who first institutionalised the slave trade which developed into the trans-Atlantic slave trade. These slave traders of Arab descent were similar to Korean brokers who were responsible for recruiting comfort women and operating comfort stations for the Japanese military during the Second World War. But left-wing historians tend to shift the blame on the colonial powers such as Britain and Japan in order to demonise colonialism, while depicting former colonial subjects as innocent victims.
The slavery in the United States, as wrong as it was, was very mild compared to the slavery around the world, some of which, as you have pointed out, is still going on. I used to frequent Accra, Ghana in Africa, where they still use minors in child slavery. That is just one example. The United States is exceptional in that we actually banned slavery, and stopped it.
Ok, well one, you said third world country, which has got to be just about the most loosely used term behind fascist. Third world just means a country that didn't chose between capitalism and communism during the Cold War. Any one who chose communism was 2nd world, capitalism, 1st world. It just tended to be countries in South America and Asia that chose communism, and then most European countries that chose capitalism. So what's left, poor countries in Africa and some of the more poorer countries in Asia (such as say, Pakistan) that didn't chose either way simply because they had yet to organize their country to the point where that topic would be relevant. India is technically a 1st world country, the world's largest capitalism, but no one calls it that, because while a large part of its population is just as well of as any European, there is a gap, as many of the leftovers of the caste system still exist and plague the lower class with extreme poverty. Ok, now that that is out of the way, the end of the white race? If you were a true Nazi, you would know that there are three very different races, Caucasoid, Mongoloid, and Negroid. I think you can figure out which belongs where (Caucasoid encompasses Europe, Western Russia, India, and a lot of the -stans like Uzbekistan, Mongoloid is Chinese, Japanese, etc, and Negroid is confined to Africa). There is no such thing as the white race, this particular notion was actually generated by the allied powers because the Nazis were accepting a wide variety of people, just not Jews, Slavs, Gypsies, and any Negroid and some Mongoloids. Ok, so with that, the majority of immigration to the US is confined to Mongoloids and Caucasoids. I am not sure what you are asking now, as the white race doesn't exist, and most of the immigrants to the US are Caucasoids, although the Mexican and Asian immigrants tend to be more Mongoloid, but the majority of the population is still Caucasoid. I guess, to furthermore ask, what is the problem with the end of the "white race". Mixed children tend to exhibit better aesthetics than both of their parents, improved perks from both (superior bone structure, intellectual ability, etc.), and are nowadays more and more accepted. - - - Updated - - - The difference was that in America it was based solely on race, while, in this form of slavery, it is more to do with debt bondage, kidnapping, and other illegal practices which have nothing to do with race.
Actually, people say that all of the time, cause we ain't bigots... Japan http://www.cnbc.com/id/102250812 China http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/opinion/2014-05/29/content_17552024.htm GCC http://www.mepc.org/journal/middle-...erceptions-realities-and-policy-options?print
Yeah but the main criticism of racism in the US is that it was racist, asserting dominance of one people over another. The rest of the world has unbiased slavery, so while it is still bad, it wasn't as prejudiced as the slavery in the US.
