JASTA Bill a Cruel Hoax on 9/11 Families & Americans

Discussion in '9/11' started by Bob0627, Sep 15, 2016.

You are viewing posts in the Conspiracy Theory forum. PF does not allow misinformation. However, please note that posts could occasionally contain content in violation of our policies prior to our staff intervening.

  1. Bob0627

    Bob0627 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2015
    Messages:
    9,296
    Likes Received:
    2,833
    Trophy Points:
    113
    What else is new? The US government (all of it) constantly scams its own constituents to serve its criminal and treacherous agenda. Treason is clearly defined in the US Constitution:

    "Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort." - Article III Section 3

    Yet there is an invention in American law that effectively overrides the Constitution, something only a valid Amendment can do and never a piece of legislation or a judicial decree. It's called "sovereign immunity". What this insidious piece of garbage does is protect our enemies from being sued. It is clearly treason. So Congress dangled a carrot in front of the 9/11 families called JASTA, which effectively waives the sovereign immunity doctrine in their lawsuit vs the Saudis. But as it turns out, they made it totally ineffective, not to mention that the war-criminal-in-chief has already promised to veto it no matter what form it took.

    Here's the latest on JASTA:

    http://thefreethoughtproject.com/sue-saudi-bill-passes-house/#SOz1qCaRAdDiIMfW.99
     
  2. Bob0627

    Bob0627 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2015
    Messages:
    9,296
    Likes Received:
    2,833
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Obama Vetoes JASTA. As expected and as much as the bill is a toothless scam, Obama decided to keep protecting the REAL 9/11 criminals in what is basically an act of treason. The traitor cites "national security" as his reasoning. This is the standard excuse, no supporting evidence required. just play the "national security" card. The traitor-in-chief says:

    “I recognize that there is nothing that could ever erase the grief the 9/11 families have endured. My Administration therefore remains resolute in its commitment to assist these families in their pursuit of justice and do whatever we can to prevent another attack in the United States,” the president wrote in his veto message to Congress. “Enacting [this legislation] into law, however, would neither protect Americans from terrorist attacks nor improve the effectiveness of our response to such attacks.”

    Except it's not about that, it's about JUSTICE, something this government detests because it runs counter to its racketeering agenda.

    But a group of families of 9/11 victims who have been advocating for the bill said in a statement Friday that they were “outraged and dismayed at the president’s veto,” rejecting “the unconvincing and unsupportable reasons that he offers as explanation.”

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...s-911-bill-veto-is-coming-down-to-the-buzzer/
     
  3. Bob0627

    Bob0627 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2015
    Messages:
    9,296
    Likes Received:
    2,833
    Trophy Points:
    113
  4. Bob0627

    Bob0627 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2015
    Messages:
    9,296
    Likes Received:
    2,833
    Trophy Points:
    113
  5. ChristopherABrown

    ChristopherABrown Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2014
    Messages:
    5,149
    Likes Received:
    175
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Gender:
    Male
    Looks like a form of official ping pong with the publics perceptions of proper, lawful leadership.

    This is why our lawful and peaceful revolution is a necessity.

    Elections are a farcical theatre. By simply unifying behind the two most prime constitutional intents,

    Do you agree and accept that the framers of the founding documents intended for us to alter or abolish government destructive to our unalienable rights?

    Do you agree and accept that the ultimate purpose of free speech is to enable the unity adequate to effectively alter or abolish government destructive to our unalienable rights?


    American state Citizens define reason for an Article V convention that can compel state legislators to begin holding conventions proposing amendments that remove the secret governments powers.
     

Share This Page