Any evidence is far less important than the treatment it gets. Poeple do not want the truth - they want to follow the rest of the pack. Poeple prefer ignoring the elephant in their living rooms if they get ostracized for mentionning it. Best exemple of this is the Kennedy's killing shot on Zapruder's movie: it is evident that it came from the front of the cavalcade yet many people prefer the alambiquated "analysis" they have been coerced with rather than accept the responsability of dissidence.
Anyone who has ever actually seen the grassy knoll knows there was no shooter there. If that JFK ride occurred today there would be hundreds of videos from every angle with every detail on the net within minutes.
The Notorious Banned FOX 9-11-2001 News Footage Israeli/Mossad Links [video=youtube;LbkQddEDPs0]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LbkQddEDPs0[/video]
There - right there. Immediately, you refused to register what is pretty clear on the Zapruder movie. You took the first train to get out of there, to get out of the evidence's grasp. F*ck the Kennedy thing - there's a thousand more exemples. The point is, even the evidence isn't sufficient to some. Ever heard of the expression "ignoring the elephant in the living room", or "the emperor's new clothes" tale? That's the way we're made. We are able to ignore evident facts.
This is NOT breaking news. This is a conspiracy theory thread of nothing new about a 15 year old event. I hear no "explosive." Collapsing structures make noise. Ever break a stick? The snapping sound is not an "explosion."
Report: Netanyahu Says 9/11 Terror Attacks Good for Israel http://www.haaretz.com/news/report-netanyahu-says-9-11-terror-attacks-good-for-israel-1.244044
Breaking a stick is something else than 3 skyscrapers coming down in New York that day, while only 2 have been hit by planes. 3 - 2 = 1 right? And no zero.
I'm sure the building had compressed tanks of some kind, such as air ranks, fire extinguishers or other that could have exploded due to heat.
The flight attendant herself has been accused of being an undercover government agent infiltrated in the midst of the unsuspecting conspiracy theorists. The plot thickens Trump and brain in the same sentence...et tu, Brute? Not that I'm a Hillary fan, either...
My bad What I meant was that he probably overhead the Bin Ladens staying at his hotel at some point and thought that he could give them a hand so that his building would be the highest on lower Manhattan.
And it wasn't even hit by a plane... yet it came down completely, symmetrically in 6,8 seconds... [video=youtube;nc9Xad6ooPo]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nc9Xad6ooPo[/video] Skyscrapers don't do that. Only on 9-11 and when controlled demolitioned.
I am sorry I wasted My time reading this rubbish, especially considering the OP and his well established Anti Semetic views, I was at Ground Zero, WTC-ll, helping evacuate the area before the collapse of Tower ll, I heard no explosions or any of the other things these conspiracy people are talking about. Instead of relying on Googled crap, you should talk to actual survivors of 9/11/01, ask Me, I will be more than happy to tell you what I know.
The typical OCT defender's mantra "explosions do not necessarily mean explosives" for them translates to "it can't possibly be explosives" but it never means "it's possible that it was explosives" despite the fact that explosives always result in explosions when ignited unless the explosives are defective.
You chose the JFK. The film shows a high powered rifle hit to the head. Most experts agree that it came form the rear. Are they all part of a conspiracy? All paid to lie and fudge their results? - - - Updated - - - You are very inconvenient.
There are documented accounts by well over 100 first responders of hearing, feeling and being injured by explosions. These people were interviewed and what they reported was what they witnessed, it has nothing to do with conspiracies or conspiracy theory. There are well over 500 accounts that have documented by the NY Times. Just because you didn't hear anything does not mean others didn't either, you can only speak for yourself and no one else. http://graphics8.nytimes.com/packag...12_WTC_GRAPHIC/met_WTC_histories_full_01.html
Its worse than that. Roth herself is one of these alt-right loons who blame the Jews for everything: http://www.renegadetribune.com/incendiary-radio-rebekah-roth-on-the-jewish-orchestration-of-911/ "Robert Reyvolt speaks to Rebekah Roth, author of Methodic Illusion and Methodic Deception. Her novels have opened many new eyes to how certain jewish forces conspired to attack the United States on September 11th, 2001. " The fact people are calling her "disinfo" just means the usual Punch and Judy scam is on. Remember the great falling out of Jones and Fetzer where both sides call each other "agents", but promoted each others websites for years? Yeah, this OP was a waste of time.
You just re-inforce my point. What are you willing to believe, "experts" or your own eyes? Like I've wrote, dissidence is a responsability, while accepting the mainstream sht is both easy and comforting.
Deers with a .303 and bears with a 90-lbs strenght pulley bow, yeah (not in the head, though). Why, you are going to tell me that they jerk towards the shot? If that's so - no, they don't. I can't believe shooters can gobble up that story.
If you ever fired a gun, you wouldn't believe it yourself. It also takes quite a lot of nerve to overcome the top of one's head being blown away. IMO nerves takes second seat after the massive bullet. See, that's a gross lie, but you still trust it more than your own eyes. Your eyes are seeing it, but the "memo" stops dead at your brain, who says "hey, wait a minute; I am invested in this: I have been saying that the shooter was behind JFK - surely if I change my opinion now, I am going the laughing stuff of my brother-in-law next sunday. Quick, let us find "an expert" who will have an opinion like mine in the matter. Hands, google it!" So Let me rest my case.
If you had ever shot any living thing with a gun you would know that the results vary. In fact, I am rather sure you do know that. Why pretend that you do not? - - - Updated - - - They just like a good mystery tale.
