Joe Biden 'enabled' family to sell access to 'dangerous adversaries,' Tony Bobulinski testifies

OK, so no direct payments to Joe Biden = His kid got money so therfore the money was to joe…..right ? This is from Comer:

https://www.cnn.com/2023/08/09/poli...purport a,accepted foreign payments or bribes.

So in rightwinglandia, Joe Biden is guilty because Hunter Biden got some money…..seriously ?

How about that BILLION $$$$$ that Jared and Ivanka got ? By the Republican standard, Trump was Bribed by the Saudis….right ?

 

Because (unlike Democrats) they don't run an impeachment inquiry to impeachment in 45 days with just hear say witnesses to get a losing conclusion because they had no actual evidence of anything.

Republicans have the actual account documents showing 9 Biden family members getting 24 million from hostile foreign nationals.
They have testimony and documents from the IRS
They have testimony from FBI whistle blowers
They have testimony and subpoenaed documents from 6 bank investigators who found these illegal accounts and tracked the money, where it came from, and who received it.

And with the current indictments against Hunter for tax fraud and tax evasion, they are digging even deeper.

Even if they never impeach, its good enough to have leftist defending dementia Joe taking bribes from foreign nationals.

 

Dementia Joe doesn't have to receive money to have been involved in bribes and fraud from foreign nationals..
When you can provide any service or product provided by the Biden family, or any non existent reports to the IRS or SEC filings, to receive 24 million from foreign nationals, then distributed to 9 Biden family members, you will let us know, right?

Yeah, how about that.
Making it more than obvious all you know about is propaganda, not actual facts.
(UNLIKE THE BIDENS) Jared actually filed the proper SEC regulation documents declaring how much his company received, where it came from, what services are being provided, and how much they are charging the account to manage it as per the regulations on foreign national investment.

Ivanka never received any money. She applied for trade marks, (like everyone else in the world) to sell her own product lines in China without them being copied.

You will have to do better than this.[/QUOTE]

 

So republicans have the actual evidence, actual testimony, actual documents showing bribery? Again what's missing for them to impeach today? I keep hearing there is incontrovertible proof of Joe's collusion with foreign adversaries, but no action being taken.

 

LMAO, your star witness was arrested for lying.

 

Your propensity to traffic in tawdry cheap shots discredits you.

Therefore, I can't take you seriously.

 

You though Smirnov was their star witness????????????

Well, that explains it.

 

All of that is circumstantial, and circumstantial evidence, in order to impeach a president, or deprive anyone of their liberty, requires corroboration. Smirnoff was that 'corroboration', except for the small detail that he was INDICTED for LYING.

Checkmate.

 

Its called an impeachment inquiry. You should look it up.

 

Anyone who believes that piling on emojis wins an argument has lost it by default.

And, by the way, it DOES explain it.

 

An inquiry which has now been reduced to pounding on sand.

good luck with that.

 

Were past the inquory. Everyday we are told by Comer and Jordan of the indisputable evidence, yet nothing is being done.

 

Ok who's next. !!

 

tell that to your fellow travelers who call Trump the "orange stain" tRaitor, tRump and constantly whine about his affairs etc.

 

First, you would have to know what Circumstantial evidence is, which you do not.
Circumstantial evidence is indirect evidence that does not, on its face, prove a fact.

Commercial Bank accounts in your name, that you have not reported to the IRS or filed with the SEC, that you wire 24 million through, from foreign nationals, and distribute that money to 9 family members is a matter or record. Not circumstantial.
But the desperation is priceless

More Patricio propaganda for lack of knowledge.
Smirnov has NOTHING to do with the bank accounts found that were used to launder millions.
In fact, nobody even knew about Smirnov until after the impeachment inquiry was already in full motion.

FBI whistle blowers exposed file 1024 on an FBI investigation who had information about Biden taking a 5 million dollar bribe from Ukraine.
Nothing to do with Biden bank account fraud.
When questioned, Wray even refused under oath to even give Smirnovs name stating he was a 14 year trusted and credible source paid hundreds of thousands of dollars.

THEN, when the subpoena hit the FBI, and they were forced to provide it to the committee, and exposed to the public, the FBI charges their 14 year trusted and credible source for lying?

Only those left over 15%ers are this easily dupped. They swallow anything they are told no matter the actual events.

 

There is no next.

Smirnov has NOTHING to do with the bank accounts found that were used to launder millions.
You know, the 20 accounts not registered with the IRS or SEC that were used to launder 24 million from adversarial foreign nationals then distributed to 9 Biden family members.
Thats how the impeachment inquiry was started.

In fact, nobody even knew about Smirnov until after the impeachment inquiry was already in full motion.

FBI whistle blowers exposed file 1024 on an FBI investigation who had information about Biden taking a 5 million dollar bribe from Ukraine.
Nothing to do with Biden bank account fraud.
When questioned, FBI director Wray even refused under oath to even give Smirnovs name stating he was a 14 year trusted and credible source paid hundreds of thousands of dollars.

THEN, when the subpoena hit the FBI, and they were forced to provide it to the committee, and exposed to the public, the FBI charges their 14 year trusted and credible source for lying?

Smirnov was just icing on the cake and has NOTHING to do with the original investigations, the IRS testimony, the FBI whistle blowers, or the 6 federal bank investigators who found all the accounts and where the money came from, and you it was distributed too.

 

We are? Who told you that?

You mean like having Bidens brother testify yesterday?
Or the upcoming Hunter testimony?

The impeachment inquiry will be over when they say its over.

 

This is where you loose all honest people. Yes, some in the Biden family have money, but to claim that they have money because you claim it came from foreign source, with literally NO PROOF, that where you loose all honest Americans.

It should be simple, show use where the money came from? Thats should be easy since you claim to already know, so show us the evidence….

 

That immature crap does get old.

 

It's well known that Hunter got paid millions by Burisma and Chinese companies liked to the CCP.

 

I actually clicked on a few of the links.

What struck me about all of them was how flagrantly partisan, and unprofessional in the extreme. Not even a hint of decorum. Talking points, to be cribbed verbatim by right wingers everywhere.

And all, allegations.

 

The FBI arrested their own informant of 15 years…Wray lied to Congress and said he was credible enough and Comer never knew his name… you are confused of the vast amount of evidence Comer has without his testimony.

 

Comer has state unequivocally Joe Biden is the brand that was being sold.

So let's start the impeachment.

 

You are confusing Comer/Gym "smoke" with evidence. They seem to be blowing some heavy Ruskie "smoke".

 

The evidence are the bank records. And if you think Putin is involved in this, then put up the evidence you crave.