Lesbian teacher: How I convince kids to accept gay marriage, starting at 4-years-oldl

well, she said that is trying to convince children to "accept" and treat with respect the homosexuals, that`s not the same to indoctrinate to be gays in the future or something similar

 

This thread poses one supposed issue as a pretext for the thread creator once again to express intolerance for homosexuals and lesbians.

The issue as to what age we should teach children about sexuality and what is age appropriate curriculum should be the issue. Using it to not discuss that actual issue but to insult gay people and question their existence is what this thread is doing and that is b.s.

As for teaching about gender preference, The reason some argue teach it to children around 9 or 10 is because they already are hearing about it and in a negative way.

Myself I think like many parents gay or straight, under 9 is too young around 10-12 is when you do it.

The ironic thing is the amount of ignorance on this thread is a strong argument for why we need sex education.

 

You know black folks are getting tired of being compaired to gays?

But yeah, just go ahead and attempt to justify the brainwashing of young children. Funny, when I assert these progressive teachers brainwash children you progressives deny it, yet when it comes out of their mouths you justify it.

Personal and socal politcs have absolutely no place in the classroom, yet you progressives deny schools are basically progressive indoctrination centers..

And you progressives wonder why non-progressives send their kids to private schools or home school them? then you have the (*)(*)(*)(*)ing audacity demonize that?

Public schools are zombie farms...

 

No wrong, that is just another attempt to justify the progressive brainwashing of children.

No responsible teacher (conservative or not) would brainwash a child with social issues. Unlike progressives (who believe it takes a community to raise a child) conservatives leave those ideals up to the parents - because they unlike progressives respect the family unit.

Of course in a progressives mind teaching kids about anyting BUT social issues is conservative brainwashing - especially when it comes to economics that work.

 

The First Amendment:

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

That means a person can exercise their religion free of federal approval or limitation. A parent can teach their children a particular religion without seeking approval fom the federal government - or from you.

 

Right. Those who believe in freedoms allow the parents to teach their children, and allow adults to make their own decisions on social issues. Statists believe in forced coercion.

 

I am far from progressive but I guess it's easier to label anyone you disagree with as something you despise. I never compared blacks to gays - just the tribulations faced by each. Black people in the U.S. are by far the most racist and bigoted of any ethnicity so I really do not care what "black people are tired of", the arguments against gay people are the same that were against black people with a few minor exceptions. The fact that they have forgot the trials of their ancestors is not relevant to me, the similarities between the two struggles are.

And please quote me when I have ever demonized anyone for sending their children to private or charter schools for a better education. I am a huge proponent for charter schools and believe kids should get the best education - public schools fail in almost every area. That's another lie you have been caught in - you must be a result of our public education system. Assertions without facts are all you people have left.

And yes - gay people exist - teaching that they do is not indoctrination. It's simple reality

 

L

Once I showed you how dumb your comment was, you tried to alter it. It's still there though.

 

In what universe do you believe that school children don't understand that gay people exist? the progressive media and entertainment sector does their best to push homosexuality whenever possible, so the concnept cant be avoided.

Also lets not forget that this teacher wasn't teaching that gays merely existed - she was brainwashing them to accept gay marriage.

The teacher should be fired. If a teacher was teaching students to oppose gay marriage in school that teacher would be fired. Of course the same rules don't apply to bat(*)(*)(*)(*) crazy 1984-type progressive teachers.

(*)

 

Because it is the "progressives" attempting to force religion into public schools but then (*)(*)(*)(*)(*) and moan when it is any religion but the one they believe in. Progressives are corrupt, social CONS are not far behind - but at least the progressives have the gonads to admit their agenda.

 

So no quote? Ok...

I altered my comment? Where - they are direct quotes. I told you that homosexuality exists in nature - in response to you saying "It is outside of nature. It is abnormal."

So it is not outside of nature - quite the opposite of your statement.

It is normal because it has been seen throughout human history and it exists in nature. It is not typical - but as a recurring branch of human sexuality it is quite normal.

 

Yeah they admit their authoritarian fascist agenda and justify it because they know their progressive party is in rank and the minions wont question the agenda because they're too stupid to.

Of course the typical progressive minion would have absolutely no idea how brainwashing children with social issues is possibly wrong because they have no real morals or ethics they developed themselves - every ounce of their being has been dictated to them. Of course this is why this progressive brainwashing teacher gets away with this and progressives support it and laugh about it - as if brainwashing children is somehow funny.

 

Many kids do not know gay people exist, and if you read the extremely biased piece the op has presented (life site news is about as impartial to gay rights as huff post is to the rights of a fetus) it even admitted the program was mainly to combat bullying.

I cannot find the story anywhere else so I take its ethnicity with a grain of salt but I am perfectly fine with teaching gay people exist, they are sometimes married, and they should not be bullied. Bullies (both adults and their brainwashed children) are the problem - not the gays (well some gays are a huge problem but not this instance)

 

So you think it is brainwashing teaching children that bullying is wrong, that people exist and they can marry? Interesting

Who thinks this is funny? I find the whole situation that gay people face (because of moral ethical bullies) to be quite sad actually.

 

Oh I see, you want kids who have no idea that sex even exists to be taught about gay sex.

How is this - kids who cant even rationalize how babies are made cant possibly rationalize homosexuality.

Maybe we need to stop sexualizing children?

Once again progressives are bat(*)(*)(*)(*) crazy and the notion that they want to brainwash young children with sexuality goes to show how (*)(*)(*)(*)ing disgusting pigs they are.

How do you explain to a child that has no sexuality about homosexuality???

There is no possible way to do that without sexualizing them.

So if it comes down to having to teach a child about gay sex to make them aware of homoseuxality then the conspect shouldn't be taught.

 

I showed your first entry here. You claimed that homosexuality is just another normal because it can be seen in other species. That is just freaking dumb.

Then you said it's deviant behavior and outside the norm, but is somehow normal. How can behavior outside the norm be normal?

- - - Updated - - -

and one has to wonder why they want to do this? Any ideas?

 

How does a child that has no cocept of sex bully another child over sexuality?

Furthermore I could care less about bullying. Hell the reason why kids today shoot up schools is because they're too damn soft and the second they feel "not liked" they blow a gasket. Funny how when kids actually got bullied there were few school shootings -now that bullying has been an issue - school shootings have gone through the roof.

That's what happens when progressive society treats all children as "winners" and eliminates standards..

The funniest part is these progressive "anti-bullies" are the biggest (*)(*)(*)(*)ing bullies in the world.

 

One of the rules for radicals is to break down the moral fiber of a society.

You have to destroy a society before you can rebuild it.

It has nothing to do with acceptance of gays and everything to do with testing how obedient people are.

What people will accept without asking questions - no matter how disgusting it is - like sexualizing 5-year-olds with gay sex while cloaking it in tolerance or political correctness.

 

Talk about editing posts...
I said homosexuality is normal (in the realm of human sexuality) as it has always existed and will more than likely always exist. Why am I having to repeat this ad nauseam.

My post about it existing in nature was in response to you saying it is not normal because it is "outside of nature". Thus using the reverse of your point - would make it normal.

Are you suggesting that gay people be discriminated against simply because they do not represent the majority? I've heard that argument before...

- - - Updated - - -

So now the teacher was discussing gay sex? Even life site didn't go that far...
Is talking about a married heterosexual couple talking about straight sex?

 

Of course you do not think bullying is a problem, not supprised by this admission in the slightest.

School shootings have remained steady statistically so I'm not sure where you are getting you (mis)information from - probably another talking point you have pulled out of your ass.
It seems that most of the mass shootings occur in the deeply religious extremely tolerant south, not supprised by that either:


I do agree with you on treating everyone as if they are winners. It is a travesty.

 

Right so how do you explain to a little boy he's not gay because his friend is a little boy, yet his dad is because he has a "special" friend?

Maybe these issues have no damn place in the classroom?

The parents should be explaining these things not some dirty progressive teacher.

 

I would guess probably the same way you would explain the differences to a little boy between having a female friend and a wife/girlfriend.

Too bad parents usually avoid such topics until their 14 year old is pregnant.

And again, just because someone is gay or an advocate for SSM does not make them a progressive.

 

There is no way to explain it without confusing a kid. Kids know mommy and daddy are in a unique relationship which is different from relationships they have with their same sex friends.

Oh and the simple fact you're really trying to say that if we don't teach children about gay sex in public school their 14-year-old will get knocked up is absolutely disgusting and a typical scare tactic progressives love to use to promote their deviant ways.

Funny how I figured out gays existed and no one had to explain anything to me...

The reason why 14-year-olds get knocked up is because they're lazy and stupid - not to mention progressives promote teenage sex as great and natural.

 

So you then tell the kid there dad is in a relationship, that the other man is his husband.

I do not think children should thought about sex (unless they ask) until an appropriate age. And enhasais need to be put on telling kids that sex is very dangerous especially if you do not wear protection. It is best to wait but if you don't, protect yourself and your partner.

The 14 year pregnancy comment was related to parents not teaching kids about the dangers of sex.

Good job?

So conservative teaching of "abstinence" is a great policy for hormonal teens? We need education on sex, its dangers the safe way to do it once a child is old enough to understand the topic.

 

Schools shouldn't be teaching any of this.

Kids know about this stuff when they realize sexuality for themselves. I knew about it when I was 10, no one had to tell me a damn thing and this was before the internet. Hell these days kdis have access to all this information on their damn cell phones - it doesn't take a teacher to teach this nonsense. Progressives just like to insert their political bull(*)(*)(*)(*) position into anything and everything to see what they can get away with.

Besides, this progressive moonbat claimed she was teaching kids about gay marriage during math class so lets not change the subject here.

This thread is about brainwashing children with progressive politics during math class and not sexual education.