Lesbian woman demands double standard when she has sex with 15-year-old

and you don't think there has ever been a 17 y.o. prick of a boyfriend, that a parent knew was screwing his 14-15 y.o. daughter, that just sat back and bided his time, waiting for the 18th b-day in order to report it?

That's called legal politics. Is it ethical.... that depends on you and how bad you want to get back at the older lover. But the law is the law, sorry 18 y.o. failed law studies... but that's the risk you run when you fawk an underaged girl.... either gender

 

Drank in bars when I was 18.
But thats not the point, we are not talking about drinking age. Its universally held in the US that 18 is an adult.
That is the line of demarcation whether you can drink in certian states or not.
You can serve in the military at 18. You are an adult.

 

So why aren't there two sets of sex crimes connected to minors? How can people truly argue that sex with a teenager is the same as sex with a pre-pubescent? Both are wrong, but the latter is clearly more abhorrent than the former. Isn't it ludicrous labelling both the twenty year old who has sex with a sixteen year old and the forty year old who has sex with an 8 year old with the same tag of paedophile? Why not come up with a separate term for the twenty year old which is still condemnatory yet which puts him or her in a different category from the forty year old?

 

Happend to a guy I know. Dated a much younger girl when he was 18 through about 20.
Broke it off, her mom got pissed that her little girls heart was broken.
Now he is a sex offender. Crappy jobs for the rest of his life, treated like a felon. Gets pulled over for speeding.
Cuffed and stuffed while any woman in his truck is interviewed.
Tens of thousands in lawyer bills to get it off his record, no luck.
Now he is 37 and washes cars for a living at a dealership.

 

Maybe for the purpose of drinking legally. But not a sexual relationship.
And in Florida, you can be in a bar at 18. Just not served alcohol.
For all intents and purposes, the woman is an adult and her lover is a minor. She is screwed.

 

Once again, a shining example of why I would never, ever leave a child alone with Blackrook: he doesn't understand the fundamental developmental differences necessary to understand why pedophilia is bad. And he's a habitual liar, apparently.


OT: Man, you guys are (*)(*)(*)(*)ing crazy with your statutory rape laws. A 3-year age difference while both are still in high school is grounds for 15 years in prison? Jesus (*)(*)(*)(*)ing Christ. Unfortunately, though, there is no real evidence that this is a gay thing - sure, there's no reason at all why this should be the law, but it is the law, and unless there's a history of heterosexual cases getting shrugged off, then there's no basis for claiming that this is a homosexuality thing.

 

Bet if the 18 year old was a man you would say different.
Oh, but its two cute little girls. It can be that bad. Right? Dont make me call you a perv.

 

I tried to (*)(*)(*)(*) a 15-year-old when I was 18. She was already pregnant. Got to second base. Oh, and it was legal thanks to the ridiculously sensible "Romeo and Juliet" clause in Maine law that essentially says that it's only statutory rape between 14 and 18 if the age difference is 4 or more years. I don't think he'd say different, and I think you should stop assuming that of people.

 

if it happened to your buddy, then it should happen to the lesbian in this case. That's the only way it won't be a double standard, which is afterall, what the gays want, right? EQUALITY?

agree with the severity of the crime of not.... that's a seperate issue. But as far as equality goes... maybe lesbian shouldn't cry for equality so much when yours is the perfect case of where equality will get her.

- - - Updated - - -

like I said... you can disagree with the law all you want, I'd even side with you, but that's not the issue. It was illegal where lesbian did it, and it was when she did it...

 

then argue that point on a thread about Romeo and Juliet laws.

What this thread is about is a lesbian who broke a law where she lives. Her mother is demanding equality and shouting the word bigot and homophobe anywhere she can to distract from the issue at hand, that her daughter broke the law

 

She's a 12th grader, and her girlfriend is a 10th grader. When you look at it like that, it gives a much different perspective. But you don't seem to care about perspective, intent, and extenuating circumstances, you just see an "adult homosexual predator". Sad indeed.

 

Weeeeeelllll because she is an adult homosexual predator.
And people wonder why gays are looked down upon.
Taking up this fight for this woman makes the gay rights fight lose credability.
And proves the gays want special rights.

 

yet another gay agenda trying to ignore the fact that a child predator got caught. Being gay/straight should not affect people 'overlooking' the crime that was committed.

leave it to the gay agenda to try and make this about gay instead of child predators.

 

anything you need to do to spin it away from a gay getting "equality" treatment that your agenda pushes so hard for on paper.... but when it doesn't help, you distract distract distract

focus on R+J laws all you want. Those don't apply here. All we have here is a child predator (that happens to be gay), trying to use her gay agenda to distract from her crime.

 

Bull(*)(*)(*)(*). My feelings have nothing to do with the gender of either party, I'd have the exact same opinion if it were a heterosexual relationship.

 

Yeah, by aging by 24 whole hours it went from consensual to predatory. You guys just like the idea of a homosexual getting prosecuted for being homosexual. As I said in the post above, my opinion on the case does not change if it's heterosexual. High school kids (and ALL high schoolers are kids, even if they cross that magic line in the sand prior to graduation) have relationships. It happens. Get over it.

 

agree with the law or not is not the question..... but by all means, keep defending the child predator.... screams a lot about your charector

 

Links please...anyone can post BS

 

your previous posts beg to differ

let me post it again, in case you want to cry about how you never said that gender/sexuality mattered

 

one was already linked on this thread.....

 

A statement of fact by me does not imply bias with regard to sexuality. I would have made the EXACT same statement, with the proper genders, had it been a boy and a girl. The sexuality of the couple is not a factor. A stupid law that creates situations like this in the first place is. In many states this would NOT be a crime, even on a technicality. So stop acting like it's so cut and dried.

 

Got a post #?