Let me see if I have this right.

Everyone with a brain, now is a vaccine skeptic. RFK just got there first.

What you call a conspiracy theory turned out to be a spoiler alert.

 

It the stories in whole or in part contradict what the titles indicate then stopping with the titles means your stuck believing a lie however convenient that lie is for your peace of mind.,

 

Do you understand that there is no NEED for "propaganda" when they guy you support actually IS a convicted criminal?

Why go to the trouble when the FACTS are good enough!

At this point, you can either accept reality or deny it! But there is no need for any falsehood. It's just not needed.

 

The problem is what you think are lies, are not, so the contradictions you think are there, are not.

 

How do you know if you haven't read the stories?

 

Shoot-the-messenger is a pseudo debate trick. Try a real argument-- refute the message and not the messenger.

Just a suggestion but it would improve your rebuttal.

 

RFK Jr Says Trump Plans To Remove Fluoride From American Drinking Water

'The early days of mass fluoride medication are as shady as any conspiracy could possibly be...'

Per the OP, I have no idea why you fear RFK working to improve US health and to lessen the toll of chronic disease.

'The debate over the forced medication of the American population by the government is a long standing conflict. Today it is more important than ever after the draconian efforts of Democrats to create a path to forced covid vaccinations using economic coercion. The fight over experimental mRNA vaccines and vaccine passports has had an interesting side effect - The public is now motivated to question many other medical mandates and FDA standards with suspicious origins. Water fluoridation is one of those standards.'

'Robert F. Kennedy Jr, now part of Donald Trump's campaign dream team, is to be put in charge of US health initiatives should Trump win the election this week. Kennedy's secondary career focus (beyond politics) has been exposing faulty medical establishment practices and food industry corruption. He was a stalwart opponent of covid mandates and forced vaccination attempts and it's fair to say he is widely hated by the government funded medical elite and the media.'

'Kennedy announced this week that he has turned his sights on water fluoridation, and says Donald Trump plans to set policies in motion to end fluoridation if he returns to office.'

'On January 20, the Trump White House will advise all U.S. water systems to remove fluoride from public water. Fluoride is an industrial waste associated with arthritis, bone fractures, bone cancer, IQ loss, neurodevelopmental disorders, and thyroid disease.'

 

Does the OP oppose removing this dangerous neurotoxin from US drinking water?



https://x.com/RobertKennedyJr/statu...plans-remove-fluoride-american-drinking-water

 

Why bother refuting them? Their own history of producing lies and misinformation makes having cited them the only thing necessary to discuss. Since you cited them, can you explain why you did so, knowing that their messaging was untrue?

 

If you could you would.

 

I'm familiar with the stories so I didn't feel the need to read what I am already familiar with. You haven't given any evidence at all of what you're talking about.

 

You miss they point, it's all the made up garbage like Nazi bullshit and the dumpster load of other nonsense the DNCMSNBCNN shove out 24/7, after awhile even the Democrat party get tired of be treated like a Joetato..

 

Ya sort of like Joetato was a rutt'n buck, sharp as a tac and a ready teddy

 

Trump is almost certainly the most misquoted president of the last seventy years.

 

LOL... nah. The essence of your logic is that because you stated something, it's gospel. Laughable. Even for you.

 

That's a cop out.
why bother?

why are you here? Or are you here just to score likes from like minded members?

I don't know about you ,but I'm here to test my ideas, see how well they stand up in the public sphere. Some of those ideas might be buttressed by news articles. No one says all news sources get it right, but they do get it right often enough. Take each on a case by case basis, either you can refute what is presented, or you can't. But 'shoot-the-messenger' is a cop out.

Sorry, as a personal policy, I do not engage questions that have assumed premises.

Please substantiate your premise (knowing messaging was untrue) and then we'll go from there.

 

LOL.. so this is your favorite tactic in discussions. I'm not willing to do your opo research for you. Do your own. Figure it out and you will learn something, perhaps.

 

.
Your refusal to engage is a cop out.

You wrote;

Why bother refuting them?

Their own history of producing lies and misinformation makes having cited them the only thing necessary to discuss.

Those are claims you refuse to back up. That's a classic cop out.

I sure as hell am not going to do YOUR arguments, your homework for you.

You have it bass ackwards.

 

There ya go!
In one post how people are so easily deluded with propaganda labeled as "fact".
And how difficult it is to convince them they've been lied to.

Quick rhetorical question;
How is it the democrats failed to defeat hitler?