Liberals think too much

I've certainly never seen a centrist with as much hate for the right as you seem to have Mr. Lefty.

Why the disguise? Is it Halloween already in lalaland?

 

The title of this thread is amazing.

Staggering, even.

Yes, that's it - staggering.

 

Don't even try to tell me you haven't noticed the New Schtick On the Block Smartie!

Lefties in moderate drag? It's the rage, as liberals hide their ideological faces in shame for what they have become, and who they overwhelmingly supported in 2008.

 

Exactly. Here's what they think:

IF ONLY everybody would shut up and agree with me/us.

WE SHOULDA done things differently after 9/11.

WE COULDA had more money for Obama to throw away if George Bush WOULDA planned better.

If only, shoulda, woulda, coulda... the topics vary, but the keywords never change. Liberals think in terms of how things oughta be... not how they are. That's why they go around in a constant state of disappointment.

And now they've got Obama.

Sometimes, life IS fair.

 

Oh, I've noticed, darlin. The place is crawling with 'em! You know, libs aren't known for their bravery... it's no wonder they're all trying to hide their true feelings. Too bad it isn't working, eh?

 

Great topic, wish I'd thought of it.

 

It will never be beaten.

Never.

What was the answer, in the finish?

Or would thinking about it make you 'liberal'..?

 

All the TV news are thinly veiled govmnt fronts. I watched Deutsche Welle news (Germany) on PBS recently and was astounded that network was a corp. megaphone with govmnt propaganda.

Newsworld International, before it was squandered and became "Current TV," bought by Al Gore and others, was an excellent source of independant reporting. Well, they killed that sucker.

Any self respecting journalist would quit NBC. Their shows are tabloid partisan gunk, not reporting. Ed Yutz, a talented talk radio show, has a fanbase of genuine liberal callers who are dedicated to social reforms. But Ed made the mistake of hobnobbing with the Democratic Party elite by having them on his show 24-7. Even though Ed frequenntly disagrees with the elites, he gives too much airtime to them and marginalizes the voice of the people by giving the Party handlers a megaphone while suppressing the concerns of the people. Its a flaw that all the state-run TV news outlets have.

Down with Big Brother.

Arriana Huffington sold out to AOL. Most all the liberals there left. Like Pacifica Radio, the Nation magazine etc., it has been proven that when the chips are down, the outlet is an establishment front. "Democracy Now" was started by a 25,000 grant form a CIA conduit called the Ford Foundation, for example. For all her talk about congress being bought off on her "Pigs at the Trough" book tour, Arriana took the money and ran allowing Party pressure to censor Jesse Ventura and others.


[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ISkqQ3hpW5E"]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ISkqQ3hpW5E[/ame]

Read this bloodthirsty article at Hufington Post about Libya and the desire to kill Quaddafi. The bloodthirsty article is not "progressive" but NeoCon dogma.


http://www.huffingtonpost.com/amir-madani/dead-man-walking_1_b_891032.html


__________________________________________________ ______
some backround reading:


http://www.prisonplanet.com/huffington-post-kills-jesse-venturas-piece-on-911.html

http://www.wsws.org/articles/2010/dec2010/nati-d30.shtml

http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=2671

http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m2465/is_1_31/ai_70910941/

http://www.myleftwing.com/showDiary.do?diaryId=16625

http://www.consortiumnews.com/2008/032708b.html

http://truth-about-kos.blogspot.com/2007/08/censorship-in-blogosphere-by-liberal.html

 

It would be preferable to George Soros leading the Nation.

You have a comprehension problem. Don't worry. Most libs do. It isn't obey it is SUBMIT. BIG difference. And seeing as you aren't a christian, you have no clue as to what that means.

What's with you libs. You talk the big talk about getting women involved in politics...oh it will be a glorious day when a woman wins the presidency, it will be a great day when a black man wins the presidency. You are liars. You are the biggest sexists and racists in this country. I don't think you could even stand a democrat woman in the White House. And I believe you voted for Barrack Obama because he was half black.

 

Sheesh.

You Righties have nothing to fear.

Liberal talk radio talks so much about Republicans and their candidates policies (rather than real news items) it is practically free advertising. The liberals shows are a bad version of CNN's "Crossfire" on a daily basis.

Clear Channel Republican dogma out of the mouths of so called "Progressives" only serves the interests of the corporate media conglomerate elite, who wish to suppress genuine dialogue with regard to social reforms, and replace it with partisan bickering, namecalling, and screaming.

In this way, liberal shows are anti-intellectual ultimately perpetuating the daily "Right versus Left" tabloid food fight.

 

Submit huh? Hm well let's start with the dictionary shall we? According to Merriam-Webster.com, submit does mean giving in to an authority. a : to yield to governance or authority. a : to yield oneself to the authority or will of another : surrender. b : to permit oneself to be subjected to something. : to defer to or consent to abide by the opinion or authority of another. Those are the relevant meanings. The others were like submit documents for approval, but clearly that is irrelevant in this context. So Michelle Bachmann also used the example she became a tax attorney because her husband told her to. So I don't know how you can really escape when she said originally.

 

I am quite sure that illicit sexual affairs and who smokes and who does not, (notice, he still smokes) are what concern you, instead of who might or might not actually run the USA, A woman nut, or her even crazier husband.

 

Liberals may think too much, but conservatives tend not to think much at all.

 

An honest feeling about the actions of a political candidate is now considered hate. By gosh! I don't even know the woman. By the way, I do not hate anyone. I did not even hate the ones trying to kill me during the Vietnam war. I did not hate the terrorists on 9/11 I did not hate Clinton of bush, in fact I even voted for bush the elder, twice. When a person cannot point out the idiocy's of a public candidate, hmm, wow, what is that?
I vote for the one who comes closest to what I think should happen. Few in history have been any farther away from my beliefs the lady bachmann. I do not hate here, I do not even dislike her. I do think her actions and statements are idiotic and make her unfit to be a dog catcher.

 

As Savage puts it, I believe in borders, language and culture (there is little else I agree with him on, he is nuts).
I think Ron paul has many decent ideas, but his constitutional libertarianism makes him nuts.
I ow quite a few weapons, rifles, shotguns and pistols, and believe in the right to bear arms, I believe in legal abortion, I believe in the death penalty and on and on. My views cover the spectrum from the far right to the far left and everything in between, that makes me a centrist, despite your snide remarks.

 

I am guessing you mean ultra progessive Hillary and slick Willy? More destructive than your run of the mill combo nut package, but I can see what you are putting out.

 

Snide...who me? Hey, I can't help it if all the liberals are gone. In my country, we just rolled a majority for the Conservative Prime Minister. Toronto (= to your NY politically) just landslided to Conservative...and guess what?

Ontario, which is almost 40% of Canadas population, is going to landslide Conservative soon. Everyone know its.

So...liberals are disappearing all over the planet. Don't blame me for noticing.

 

Arianna Huffington/Michele Bachmann/Sarah Palin----Kooks, nuts and just plain foolish, even if they are getting rich off their idiocy.

 

There is nothing dumb bout living within your means, but this is not about living within in our means. The US was in a position that if the debt ceiling was not raised by Aug 2, 2011, dire consequences upon the country would take place, and Bachmann is too stupid to recognize it. She has no idea what devastation would have been caused had it not been raised, and apparently too dumb to understand what the experts were claiming.

The US would not have had enough money to pay people depending on their SS checks and the military their wages. If you don't think that is dumb, then you belong in the same class with Bachmann.

On May 6 and May 16, 2011, Secretary Geithner formally notified Congress of Treasury’s intent to utilize its authority outside of its typical cash management practices to pay federal obligations to delay the date by which the current debt limit would be reached (through a debt issuance suspension period as well as other methods discussed in more detail later in the report). Similar actions have been taken previously. These actions would extend Treasury’s ability to meet commitments through August 2, 2011. If these financing options are exhausted and Treasury is no longer able to pay for all federal obligations, some federal payments to creditors, vendors, contractors, state and local governments, beneficiaries, and other entities would be delayed or limited. This could result in significant economic and financial consequences that may have a lasting impact on federal programs and the federal government’s ability to borrow in the future.
http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R41633.pdf

Also, the government would have to rely solely on incoming revenue to pay its debts, and the Bimbo is further displaying her ignorance by stating that she will not raise taxes (especially on the rich)!

 

An interview on Faux News by right-wing Chris Wallace? Of course she is going to sound solid, I'm sure she knew exactly what she was going to be asked and had her prepared answers. It is only when she is interviewed by Mainstream media that you will be able to see the dumbness that she possesses. She and Palin and others in her class call questions by the regular media as "gotcha" questions because they either don't understand the question at the time it is asked, or they don't know the answer - so it becomes a "gotcha question".

The country was able to see how shallow Palin was when she was interviewed by Couric - mainly because it became apparent that she didn't know as much as she pretended she did.

Wiki:
Couric received the Alfred I. duPont–Columbia University Award and the Walter Cronkite Award for Journalism Excellence for the interview.[1][2][3]
The interviews were widely believed to have been a disaster for Palin's image and for the McCain Campaign, and were cited by many as the cause of a turning of the tide of public opinion against her.


The fact that most experts have advised the terrible consequences that could happen if the debt ceiling is not raised and how every American would be affected is not something to take lightly - and Bachmann's ignorance was evident when she proclaimed that if she had been President she would not have raised the debt ceiling! Hopefully we will never have to worry about that, (Bachmann being president).

 

Must not have found it too compelling, she left her job as a tax atty to become a full-time mother.

What you think and what you know are miles apart. Not only did Obama get a law degree from Harvard, he was President of the Harward Law Review and worked as a civil rights lawyer for Miner Barhill and Galland.

It is more evident that those that support her are unable to see the ignorance in her statements.

Geez, I guess all conservatives are able to discern good from evil? Generalizing usually makes a person sound stupid.

Repeating yourself only proves that you are unable to come up with credible reasons/proof of your statements, because you have none.

Ha,ha, you are describing the *********s - nobody tells Libs who to vote for because Libs aren't sheeple like conservatives, who do whatever Faux News fools them into doing.

Nobody told me to vote for Obama, I voted for him because he had a lot more intelligence than McCain and the sheer thought that if something happened to McCain that bimbo Palin would become President was enough for me to try and convince others to do the same. Too bad most conservatives thought Palin was "smart" and wasted their votes!

Insults are the only recourse for dumb people. Thanks for sharing.

 

Sounds to me like someone is pretty biased - as if Conservatives/Republicans haven't been caught dipping their you know what. At least Libs don't run under the "Family Values" theme, then go off to Argentina to visit their paramour, telling even their assistants they've gone hikiing!

 

Liberal/conservative are such general terms, you can't accurately use that term to identify someone's specific political beliefs - as proven during Bush's 8 years - although he is a Republican and considered a conservative, he was not much of a conservative.

So, liberals may be disappearing, according to you, but that doesn't mean they will vote for a bimbo like Michelle Bachmann.

 

Bimbo? LOL. Isn't that the n word to women and sexism? Tsk, tsk.

I hope that _ _ _ _ Hillary doesn't read PF. You know, I might as well type it, what the hell, I'll risk a sketchy word to women. CHIC. I hope that chic Hillary doesn't read PF.

 

What wouldn't get paid if the debt ceiling wasn't raised?

This is a lie. SS checks and the military would still get their wages if we didn't raise the debt ceiling because if the Government prioritized outgoing funds correctly we would've paid those off before running out of the cash available for the month.

Thus your argument is without merit because it is based on a lie.

And Since your next question is for me to prove it I'll jump on that.

Mertex, do me a favor a be the first liberal on here ever to admit he was mistaken or a liar.
I'm waiting.