Limbaugh on sexual consent: "No means yes if you know how to spot it"

No means no.

I have been a pig my whole life, but no means no and respecting that has probably got me more***** than I would have otherwise. I have encountered when "Dont" was soon followed by "stop" so it was only for a second or two...

 

.....

Limbaugh is just another misunderstood male that finds it easier to practice 'the art of seduction' on little boys...as grown up women will tell him he is an abject failure as a grown up lover.

 

Wha? My god man, you have got it going on.......

 

Ah dang! Another one who gets confused w/abbreviated words. Oh well!

Yeah, you're right about men should run away when they encounter a woman who's playing games w/them, but that will only happen in fantasy land........ meanwhile, back to reality......

 

That's not the woman's fault....


(No confusion just education).

 

Often, depending upon the circumstances, it's not the woman's fault and often, again, depending upon the circumstances, it's not the man's fault either......

Each one needs to take responsibility for their own actions - or lack of.

Men and women have always played head games w/each other.......

Bright, educated people don't give any tho't to the word 'thought' being spelled 'tho't' simply b/c they know what it means and they have more important things to think about........

 

Well that " ugh" does take a lot of energy to type.... And if you just can't remember where they go.......

 

Lol~ "UGH!" is what I say about nit-pickers....

 

Serious question, are you a virgin?

 

Spelling correctly is "nit-picking"...LOL I suppose any education could be termed nit-picking by SOME...

 

I see the Rawstory( and lying thread titles) mantle has been picked up....

 

This guy must be on the verge of senility.

 

I'm confused, we need consent at every "new level" of the sexual experience but what constitutes a new level?

Do we write up a law that says, you go from first base to second base, you need consent, second base to third base, you need consent again?

Or is this more of a "can I thrust again?" kind of thing? Permission to tap that ass? What if there's actually someone kinky enough to make this work?

 

Way back in post #2, Channe stated the obvious.

There is nothing more to discuss. This entire thread should have ended right there.

 

Oh dear.... some people just never learn to be their own problem solvers, so let me help you out...

If "tho't" rattles you so much......then don't read my posts!

Now see how easy that is? My children learned about problem solving around age 5, therefore, they didn't grow up to be whiners and nit-pickers.

 

The first part of this is correct. Because most liberals don't understand subcommunication between men and women.

But the second part is obviously ridiculous.

 

If no is no, I wouldn't be alive because my dad had to ask my mom out a bunch of times before she agreed to go to dinner. Persistence paid off. 40+ yrs later and still going strong. No with sex is one thing. No with a date sometimes means not now.

 

Or spellers....now why don't you let it go......

 

For all you foaming at the mouth liberal Zealots out there,

Rush beats you like a drum day in and day out.

He exposes your bs for what it is and it kills you.

He plays you like fiddle.

This consent thing is a perfect example of where

he tweaks you with a truth that Masters & Johnson

could attest to and you go berserk trying to smear him.

According to you guys, one day he is running the Republican

party and the next day he is hanging on by a thread.

You really have no idea how silly you look.

On the bright side, you are very entertaining.

 

Alcohol doesn't take away your free will. When you are under the influence, you still are able to consent.

 

Here's Time Magazine:

http://time.com/3380040/rush-limbaugh-consent-osu/

 

Interesting. Someone on this forum that actually understands rape.

No means no and alcohol is no excuse for not consenting. The key word here is consent. Sorry to all the Rush Limbaugh fans out there, but Rush is wrong in his regard. Check out the link below:

https://rainn.org/get-information/types-of-sexual-assault/was-it-rape

 

Of course, swallow the feminist claptrap wholesale like a good little pet, that's exactly what they want. I can't count how many times a woman has said "I'm not sleeping with you tonight," and then five minutes later we are in bed. No always means no only in dumbass feminist lie narrative propaganda. The statement is a semantic nullity, just another femthink tautology that sounds like it is saying something, but isn't. What it is really saying is that "whatever women say goes, women never lie, women are always right, -our- issues are always to be accepted wholesale, uncritically, with no questioning whatsoever allowed," which we all know is wrong. People change their minds on a dime, especially in sexual matters. In the heat of passion people change back and forth from no to yes several times... millions of times all over the country every single day or week, some woman is persuaded or seduced from no to yes, sometimes it's a man having his mind changed.

As others have said, it is a SPECIFIC TACTIC of many women to put up light resistance and then give in, to feel they are in control then give in. No means no when a woman wants to LEAVE or wants you to LEAVE in sexual matters, otherwise, all HONEST sexually mature adults (in US culture anyway) know desires and passions are subject to change at any moment.

 

Don't feed the trolls. Why give Rush what he wants? He's a blowhard in a dying medium fighting for relevancy, let it die.

 

Campus rape is a real issue. After Limbaugh's comments about the Duke incident, he clearly doesn't care about women's rights. But then, this is the guy who refers to single women as "semen receptacles".

Burn.