Looking for honest peer !

Over a decade of self study and research , wrote countless argument and you think I'm not serious ? I've all sorts of design ideas and fundamental experiments I'd love to try .

I always want a sensible conservation but all too often , the other participant in a typical manner , avoids answering direct questions . As you have just done with the last question . How had we suppose to have a good conversation when your minds are often so closed to criticism of existing science theory ?

With my thinking and a small team of scientists , we could do some good things !

Do you want to know the trick to being a good thinker ?

View information in your own special way !

Most of my theory is mainstream but I believe I have a better envision of the physics involved and explain it my own special way . My math doesn't really give a value result , it explains the process in other form than words , a generalisation of the process I'm describing .

 

I prefer to use my own explanation ....The distribution of A or B over a vast space k in an isotropic manner , results in the diminishing of A or B to a 0 magnitude and 0 density .

The distribution of A or B being attributed to thermal dynamics and the transition of high energy state to lower energy surrounding state .

 

Conditionally , once a binary particle manifests A + B / t =1 and inflates to create an interior binary field 1E³ , any manifested singularities then formed within the binary field retain form . The likewise force of the interior field being attributed to this process . Real science

 

All addressed on page 1. Your theories fly in the face of proven physics. You have no understanding of physics what so ever.

 

It really depends on your philosophical definition of space.

This is my view. Consider first the immovable aspect of space. I would assert that in this space, any object inherently moves infinitely fast and occupies instantaneously occupies the entire space. The definition of "space" is rendered meaningless.

This is of course not what we generally observe when using the terminology space.

What is between the distance between two points. It is space (now discussing a different definition of space).
Space slows down objects.
This type of space can be moved, though it is not so easy.

To get some analogy of what this type of space is, consider the speed of light. The speed of light is substantially slower when it is passing through a material like glass. This is because the light is interacting with the glass, but doing so in a very even and coordinated way. (In fact it's believed light can even pass through glass without losing its entanglement, a very interesting property, even though the light does have to interact with the glass)

To understand the connection between space and energy, it would also be helpful to understand the connection between energy and matter, and consider the different forms of energy being in an equilibrium, and also understand coherence effects with electromagnetic energy. Photons do not always behave as a point-like energy source to impart energy when the object is much smaller than the wavelength of the photons.

 

I consider the seven postulates are physical facts of space rather than philosophy , as the two experiments I provided seem to agree with .

 

Here's something else to consider:
If space is expanding, then that actually means the density of space is increasing.
Couldn't that actually mean that space is contracting?
I mean paradoxically it appears from our perspective that space is expanding but that is actually because, on a large scale, it is contracting?

 

To be honest, even taking a basic high school generic science course would be a massive step forward for Equality.

 

Yeah, they could teach me that a hydrogen atom consists of a proton and an electron , other atoms have a neutron . A proton is made of quarks , blah blah ...This is a fulcrum , this is that , blah blah .

Space is expanding

 

The length of measure between ''observers'' is increasing , space is not expanding . Poor semantics and interpretation , the red-shift observation of Hubble is of bodies , not of space .

 

Putting science to the test !

Explain how the hot dense state is formed , in the big bang theory ?

Explain how you conclude space is expanding from the observed red-shift of bodies ? Space does not move with an object.

Explain how a big bang event could of happened without a pre-existing space to happen in ?

Isn't it more realism that a big bang event expanded outwards into space ?

Isn't it more realism that the dense hot state was formed by a first mass singularity that attracted pre-existing energy to form a hot dense state?

Isn't A + B / t , Genesis ?


Isn't existence itself of binary opposites ?

 

Anyway , when you finally finished messing about and wasting time , I'm ready to go to experiment and research . I need a 3 bedroom house with a pond / lake in a secluded area and some equipment . The internet and a tech team access .

Not much really ...

 

Some new math ?

-Q / (x1,x2,...,xn)(y1,y2,...,yn)(z1,z2,...,zn) = 0

+Q / (x1,x2,...,xn)(y1,y2,...,yn)(z1,z2,...,zn) = 0

?????????????????

Added -

((-Q) + (+Q) / t )) * ( -Q / (x1,x2,...,xn)(y1,y2,...,yn)(z1,z2,...,zn) / t ) + (*+Q / (x1,x2,...,xn)(y1,y2,...,yn)(z1,z2,...,zn) / t ) = expansion, volume

1E³

 

Well, we know one thing for sure: The LAST THING you want is honest peer review.

 

I'm still awaiting a honest peer !

Who discusses..........

 

I've wasted too much time on here trying to get interest , if nobody is interested in Naval improvements , space travel , weapons , etc . I guess it's time I go pitch the Arabs of Dubai ....

My Ai exoskeleton notion , will make Ai feel .....nobody in the world has got this technology ....

Do you really think I can't do physics and design ?

Here is another free design ...........for electric bike use . It could also be adapted for cars .




I must be a special case, according to you I can't do and don't know physics but I can do design that works ?

I can do some engineering .........

 

you were shown what you need to do on page 1. You don't have even a basic high school level understanding of physics, or math. You can't begin to try and prove your theories (all of which fly in the face of proven physics) until you learn basic physics and math.

 

You've mentioned this before. Without a working prototype, a viable design or even a clear indication as to the underlying science then I shouldn't get my hopes up too high if I were you. Let us know how you get on

That's correct, no-one does and that's because all you have is a vague notion without any idea whether it's feasible or possible to deliver.

On the basis of the evidence of this, and the other threads I've seen you contribute to on the six months I've been posting on this board, I'd say you cannot do physics or design.

That's not a design, there's no indication what it is or how it could work.

You can ?

Show us the working prototype.

 

Obviously I'v asked around about a research investment to make prototypes . I have no money to spend on building prototypes .

That's a dynamo , of course it will work . For a bicycle ...

 

I'm mechanically minded enough to do my own experiments , designs and engineering of the fundamental experiments . I only need funds and location . Any investors would own / rent a property and I'd give a massive 90% equity of all the findings and new ''stuff'' away to the investor(s). I'd take 10% of something over 0% of nothing all day long . I additionally know , any things I might not be able to do myself , other people can , it is not difficult to hire somebody to do a particular thing or get parts machined in a factory for the experiments .

1st on my agenda is a new super propulsion system , top secret so I'm saying no more than that . The physics will work , it is just a matter of how efficient it will work . I'm hopeful it will be very efficient and super fast .

 

I think my math is getting better ?

 

No it isn't

• The units still don't match
• The 1/t terms would cancel in the middle part of the "equation"
• It's still utter gibberish

Have you pitched your "ideas" to the Middle East potentates yet ?

If not, what are you waiting for ?

If so, how did it go ?

 

My last equation got 3 likes and a share elsewhere ! Are you sure it's not just your understanding ?

It reads well to me and explains the process !

Electric field equals one times energy cubed divided by real coordinate space equals the volume of a sphere .

R^n can represent an infinite volume , true or false ?

1 = the 5 dimensional manifold of xyzE and S

delta S = 1 * E³ / R^n

 

Yes I'm sure. Where was it shared and liked ? Was it shared and liked by anyone with any subject matter knowledge or expertise ?

You're hardly an "honest peer" and in any case, your lack of knowledge is legion. An endorsement from you is, IMO, a strong indicator that it's rubbish.

Units not matching again I see

.....and more of the same garbage.

Have you pitched your "ideas" to the Middle East potentates yet ?

If not, what are you waiting for ?

If so, how did it go ?

 

No , I've not pitched the Middle East for the reason I don't like being too hot and I'd probably have to go visit there . I'd rather remain in the UK !

You claim to know a lot about math yet you've demonstrated nothing of your math . I asked for help with the math but people are unable to help with the math .

Why not help ? I'll give you co-write credits !

Is the reason because this maths is beyond your knowledge of maths ?

negative point charge / infinite space

GO ? present the maths .

It only 1 / >1 = <1

I'm sure that should be no trouble for somebody of your claimed talents .