Looks Like Jack Smith lacks Authority to represent the US Government in Any Case

Is Lying Jack Smith an Illegitimate Prosecutor? Has Every Act Taken by Him Been Without Lawful Authority?

An Election Fixing Fraud Foisted On The American People by Bribed Joe and Dirtbag Merrick?



'On December 21, 2023, a very interesting amicus”brief was filed with the United States Supreme Court in the matter of United States v. Trump. The brief was filed in response to Special Counsel' Lying 'Jack Smith’s effort to convince the Court to take up the immunity issue raised by former President Trump rather have it decided first in the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals. The brief was filed by former U.S. Attorney General Edwin Meese, and law professors Steven Calabresi and Gary Lawson from at Northwestern and Boston University Law Schools, respectively.'

Heavy Hitters.

'What the Meese brief argues is that Special Counsel' Lying 'Jack Smith occupies an office that is not recognized by law and was created by Attorney General' Dirtbag 'Merrick Garland in violation of the Appointments Clause of the Constitution. The specific details and case law involving the Appointments Clause is beyond the scope of this one article, but the foundation of Meese’s argument is that Smith was given law enforcement authorities by Attorney General' Dirtbag 'Garland that are equivalent to or greater than the authorities given to actual “Officers” of the United States – specifically U.S. Attorneys. However, unlike U.S. Attorneys who were appointed by the President and confirmed by the Senate, Special Counsel' Lying Jack 'Smith – a private citizen – was put in place by' Dirtbag 'Garland pursuant to a regulation of the Department of Justice.'

'Regulations are not “laws.” They are internal operating provisions that, for the most part, direct how the government departments conduct their business. The departments are authorized to create regulations by Congress, but some regulations are wholly internal and do not create rights or obligations for members of the public.'

Lying 'Jack Smith was named as “Special Counsel” under a regulation adopted by the Department of Justice after the independent counsel statute passed by Congress was allowed to expire without being extended near the end of the Clinton Administration.' Lying 'Jack Smith’s position and authority were created by DOJ to solve an internal operating dilemma – how to conduct criminal investigations of a President or those close to him when the President is the source of the authority to conduct those investigations -- a conflict of interest.'

And SCOTUS denied Lying Jack's ask.

 

I never said he did Condo. I said he can appeal to the appellate court. he is the lawyer on record for the criminal case on record in which Trump is appealing the motions that Judge Chunkan has denied him.

the decision is not a major blow, it is a delay since there is already an appeal on the very same nature in the Washington DC Appellate Court. That's why. And there was no explanation, no certiorari given. It was a denial with no explanation. Even your own link says that.

https://www.nytimes.com/2023/12/23/us/politics/trump-appeals-court-immunity.html

 

Does that mean that Hunter is now FREE as a bird?

Asking for a friend...

 

Tell your friend.... It means we have a House that will show president Joe Biden, Hunter, and the whole famn damily was involved in money laundering, influence peddling, and bribery.. as we can see now it was not only the corrupt Biden family but the US government that was involved multiple times in a coverup of this corrupt president and his family...

 

House Spanker Johnson is going to LOSE 2 seats when McCastrated and another Rep RESIGN shortly.

Then Spanker Johnson could LOSE another seat when that SCUMSUCKING Gaetz Ethics Committee releases their findings which could end up with him facing CRIMINAL charges.

Your Khaos Kaw-Kuss cannot agree on the color of the black ink to use to sign their names let alone manage to put together the SEMBLANCE of an Impeachment Article.

Right NOW all they have is EVIDENCE that Joe is a GOOD FATHER.

Not exactly a "high crime".

Hilarious.

 

Do you have anything to add to the conversation? Asking for your friend.

 

FAILURE to address CONTENT responding to YOUR post content duly noted.

 

Among other unprecedented things in this case smith is but one more. In fact, almost all of the cases against Trump contain multiple unprecedented things, novel previously untested legal theories and other things.

 

Won't stop democrats.

 

The disgusting part is that Jack Smith is a half assed, unelected politician who is collecting our taxpayer dollars. I begrudge every cent he gets. He true calling should be as an ambulance chasing personal injury lawyer. He has that slimy, useless look.

 

He's akin to some single room office collections attorney

 

It guarantees the trial won't happen early March at least.

 

Again no one is arguing that special counsels are illegal. The argument is that Jack Smith doesn't have the prerequisites to be one.

 

Exactly. Special Counsels that are a Senate Confirmed US Attorney, are fine.

 

NOTHING credible substantiates the BOGUS allegation against Jack Smith. There is NO Senate requirement for appointing a Special Counsel.

Don't believe me then look it up for yourself, just like I did when I saw that bovine excrement allegation.