Male Sexual Orientation Influenced by Genes?

So are you arguing that something that isn't natural, isn't good, or right?

 

Homosexuality is wrong because it's unnatural. I'm not criticizing homosexual people, im simply saying that their behavior is unnatural and goes against the bible.

 

That is your right.

I may disagree with what you say but I will defend to the death your right to say it.

 

So only natural things are right? Driving a car down a freeway is completely unnatural, flying in an airplane, living in a house with A/C and heat is unnatural.

Many things that are good that humans do are also unnatural.

So now you see where your logic fails.

In some people's interpretations yes, but the bible isn't really the authority on what is our isn't right and wrong. Even you cherry pick what you want to believe and what you don't.

 

A marriage between a man and a man serves a purpose, it isn't just sexual.

 

That was funny. I just blew 7Up through my nose.

 

If all I was interested in was sex, why would I get married? That seems like the last thing I would do.

And two guys could have sex without being married. So clearly the purposes aren't sexual, unless you meant something else. In which case explain.

 

He absolutely refuses to come up with a logical, rational argument against gay rights. I put that challenge to him several times. He is a total fail on that

 

All I am doing is pointing out that the argument is fallacious.

 

http://www.asmainegoes.com/content/non-religious-arguments-against-gay-marriage

http://www.americanthinker.com/2013/01/ten_non-religious_reasons_to_keep_marriage_traditional.html

 

The arguments presented in your links are either invalid or based on assumptions. And if you want more detail present the arguments here rather than linking them.

Furthermore I never brought up religion.

 

Not assumptions. Perfectly good reasons.

I intentionally used no religion.

 

Except it is natural.

And you have a constitutional right to not be a homosexual.

 

Good enough for you perhaps. But it doesn't cut the mustard.

I noticed you didn't post the arguments, you must be too afraid of me distracting me eviscerating them.

Doesn't make them any less faulty.

- - - Updated - - -

He even posts links to failed arguments.

 

It's as valid regardless any other opinion including yours.

Irrelevant.

Or no more accurate.

 

Your opinion of whether or nit they are valid isn't relevant.

You are hiding. Why not be honest and post the actual arguments here?

I agree, the arguments you are not honest enough to post here are no more accurate because they aren't at their core intent religious. They are no more accurate than religious arguments because they fall on the same lack of logic.

 

As are yours, but you know that. My opinion is just as
valid as yours or anyone else. Nit? Really? Were you reacting
out of anger? LOL! Too funny.

I'm hiding from nothing. You haven't provided an actual argument except
in youropinion. Mine are as logical but you don't like it.

 

you haven't really posted an argument.

Your opinions are valid meaning they are yours and you have the right to them, your argument, or lack there of isn't.

You haven't presented an argument. You posted links. Links don't make your argument. You have to apply them using logic.

I take your failure to do so as an admission that you are aware that your arguments aren't valid.

 

And how are your OPINIONS different? I mean besides that they aren't.

 

Opinions aren't relevant, I see no need indiscussing them.