https://americanfreepress.net/meet-the-man-who-invented-the-holocaust/ Just more evidence that the Holohaux was a 1970's invention
"If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it. The lie can be maintained only for such time as the State can shield the people from the Political, economic and/or military consequences of the lie" Joseph Goebbels So so true in the case of the Holohaux.
Confessions under torture "On May 4th, 1949, Van Roden was called before the Malmedy Massacre Investigation of the U.S. Senate, where he was called upon to answer questions about his widely published statements regarding the intimidation and torture of the SS prisoners to obtain confessions. It immediately became apparent that Van Roden's public statements about the alleged events were untrue. Van Roden's own testimony in the Senate hearing disavowed his public statements. In the first place, the widely published statements about the destruction of the prisoners' testicles and similarly grotesque mistreatments were not written by Van Roden at all! The inflammatory article that appeared in the Progressive magazine and subsequent publications were falsely written by James Finucane, Associate Secretary, National Council for Prevention of War, an anti-war pacisfist lobbying group in Washington, D.C. Judge Van Roden disavowed the statements attributed to his byline by James Finucane. The claim that all but two of the 139 prisoners had their testicles destroyed by the kicks and torture of the American captors proved to be a bizarre and entirely fraudulent claim. U.S. Senator Hunt, a committee member, personally interviewed Jochen Peiper, Sepp Dietrich, and the other SS convicts at Landsberg Prison on 6 September 1949 to determine the validity of their accusations of mistreatment. These interviews and the transcripts of the interviews reveal a pattern of falsehoods, gross distortions, and impossible fantasies. One by one, the grossly inflated allegations were proven to be outright false or grossly misrepresented and exagerrated. Out of the 137 men who had claimed their "testicles were destroyed," none were destroyed. Although Peiper claimed a Polish Army guard damaged one of his testicles, examination proved he had a slightly swollen testicle and likely caused his own injury to give his fraudulent claim a vestige of credence. One convict admitted the purpose of the allegations was to save them from the gallows and long prison terms they had expected to escape." Just another example of how the Allied forces extracted false testomy in order to justify their "honourable" war & set up the lies of the Holohaux See the also "Altogether more disturbing, however, were the methods employed to extract statements and "confessions" at Nuremberg, particularly those from S.S. officers which were used to support the extermination charge. The American Senator, Joseph McCarthy, in a statement given to the American Press on May 20th, 1949, drew attention to the following cases of torture to secure such confessions. In the prison of the Swabisch Hall, he stated, officers of the S.S. Leibstandarte Adolf Hitler were flogged until they were soaked in blood, after which their sexual organs were trampled on as they lay prostrate on the ground. As in the notorious Malmedy Trials of private soldiers, the prisoners were hoisted in the air and beaten until they signed the confessions demanded of them. On the basis of such "confessions" extorted from S.S. Generals Sepp Dietrich and Joachim Paiper, the Leibstandarte was convicted as a "guilty organisation". S.S. General Oswald Pohl, the economic administrator of the concentration camp system, had his face smeared with faeces and was subsequently beaten until he supplied his confession. In dealing with these cases, Senator McCarthy told the Press: "I have heard evidence and read documentary proofs to the effect that the accused persons were beaten up, maltreated and physically tortured by methods which could only be conceived in sick brains. They were subjected to mock trials and pretended executions, they were told their families would be deprived of their ration cards. All these things were carried out with the approval of the Public Prosecutor in order to secure the psychological atmosphere necessary for the extortion of the required confessions. If the United States lets such acts committed by a few people go unpunished, then the whole world can rightly criticise us severely and forever doubt the correctness of our motives and our moral integrity." The methods of intimidation described were repeated during trials at Frankfurt-am-Mein and at Dachau, and large numbers of Germans were convicted for atrocities on the basis of their admissions. The American Judge Edward L. van Roden, one of the three members of the Simpson Army Commission which was subsequently appointed to investigate the methods of justice at the Dachau trials, revealed the methods by which these admissions were secured in the Washington Daily News, January 9th, 1949. His account also appeared in the British newspaper, the Sunday Pictorial, January 23rd, 1949. The methods he described were: "Posturing as priests to hear confessions and give absolution; torture with burning matches driven under the prisoners finger-nails; knocking out of teeth and breaking jaws; solitary confinement and near starvation rations." Van Roden explained: "The statements which were admitted as evidence were obtained from men who had first been kept in solitary confinement for three, four and five months ... The investigators would put a black hood over the accused's head and then punch him in the face with brass knuckles, kick him and beat him with rubber hoses ... All but two of the Germans, in the 139 cases we investigated, had been kicked in the testicles beyond repair. This was standard operating procedure with our American investigators." The "American" investigators responsible (and who later functioned as the prosecution in the trials) were: Lt.-Col. Burton F. Ellis (chief of the War Crimes Committee) and his assistants, Capt. Raphael Shumacker, Lt. Robert E. Byrne, Lt. William R. Perl, Mr. Morris Ellowitz, Mr. Harry Thon, and Mr. Kirschbaum. The legal adviser of the court was Col. A. H. Rosenfeld. The reader will immediately appreciate from their names that the majority of these people were "biased on racial grounds" in the words of Justice Wenersturm -- that is, were Jewish, and therefore should never have been involved in any such investigation. Despite the fact that "confessions" pertaining to the extemination of the Jews were extracted under these conditions, Nuremberg statements are still regarded as conclusive evidence for the Six Million by writers like Reitlinger and others, and the illusion is maintained that the Trials were both impartial and impeccably fair. When General Taylor, the Chief Public Prosecutor, was asked where he had obtained the figure of the Six Million, he replied that it was based on the confession of S.S. General Otto Ohlendorf. He, too, was tortured and his case is examined below. But as far as such "confessions" in general are concerned, we can do no better than quote the British Sunday Pictorial when reviewing the report of Judge van Roden: "Strong men were reduced to broken wrecks ready to mumble any admission demanded by their prosecutors." Al this came to light in 1949 during the Malmedy trials. Also see "Torture & testicle crushing during at Nuremburg trials" https://www.darkmoon.me/2015/torture-and-testicle-crushing-at-nuremberg/ So if anyone tell you that they have some "flimsy" evidence of the Holhaux by confessions of ex-National Socialists prisoners. Well you can only assume they are liars & lovers of torture!
I suppose this is in response to what I asked you in the other thread. For a start the American Free Press is not an accurate, unbiased or impartial source of information. In fact it actually caters for and has articles provided by neo-nazi's, white supremacists and anti-semites. Secondly the book that was referenced isn't evidence, its conjecture at best. Did you actually read this before you posted it?
Good luck in your journey "enlightening" the world. The amount of people out of touch with reality on this board seems to be growing by the hour.
The number of people that are realising that the Holocaust is a hoax is growing, thanks to the Internet. What next? Clamp down on the Internet? To cover the lies?
I can't go with that. If it is then how do you explain the vast amount of footage of the prevailing conditions within the camps post-liberation? The extermination ovens weren't built to bake bread!
If there's one of those, then great. I did look to see if there was a conspiracy theories category but there doesn't seem to be.
Wasn't this guy fervently denying that he was an anti-Semite only a little while back? Finally feel emboldened to show your true colours Lunecat I see.
