Merrick Garland Breaks the Law

The president's son was receiving million$ from foreign countries for "doing nothing". Of those million$ he said he gave his father 10%. Yep, he broke no laws, nothing to see here, move on and let's just concentrate on what pronouns we should use and stomp out systemic racism and white supremacy.

 

Your characterization doesn't match what I read from your source (before it told me that, to read further, I needed to sign up for a subscription). Garland was only reminding employees of proper procedure, which is to go through the DOJ's office of legislative relations-- according to your cited article.

 

Leaking info on ongoing investigations is a crime.

Releasing unverified accusations is slander.

Both are grounds for dismissal from the FBI.

 

There is no evidence this happened.

 

And doesn't that make what happened from 2017-2021 grounds for a really interesting conversation...

 

Stunningly ignorant. A memo reminding employees of the department’s policy manual turns into this rubbish?

 

It only works one way!!

 

Oh yeah, right, and there was no evidence VP Agnew took money under the table. Now on to white supremacy that is wall-to-wall in the USA and the copious list of proper, or improper, pronouns. Meanwhile the queers are chanting, "We're coming for your children".

 

Unfortunately, unethically using the family name for profit isn't illegal. There is no evidence $ was funneled to Joe despite the plethora of accusations.

 

Joe became a multi-millionaire on a politician's salary. You believe he's honest you go right ahead. As Truman once said, "Show me a man that gets rich by being a politician and I'll show you a crook." Well I'm showing you both Joe Biden and Hunter Biden. None are so blind as those who refuse to see.

 

If you enjoy conversing about unsubstantiated allegations regarding Joe's involvement, which I know you do, then yes. If you recognize Hunter's activities as a private citizen are inconsequential to Joe's governance as prez, no.

 

Thanks, I will. https://www.forbes.com/sites/michel...fter-leaving-the-white-house/?sh=76b06cd71e42
How do we know what Joe's income was? Because he made his tax returns public.

 

Oh.. so now you are worried about allegations being unsubstantiated??? LMAO.. You were one if not the lead cheerleader for Russia Russia Russia.... And now, just now, you're worried if an allegation is substantiated or not... Classic... LOL

 

http://www.politicalforum.com/index...-ubiquitous-meme-from-trump-loyalists.601357/

It's handy to have at my disposal a pre-written thread smashing your denial to bits.

 

LOL... who denied what? More, here is your chance to tell us, again, why do you only now feel that allegations must be substantiated? You didn't. For YEARS when you used unsubstantiated, and frankly made up BS to attack a sitting president. And just now, we are to believe that you never engaged in this? Laughable.

 

You do each and every time you write something like........"You were one if not the lead cheerleader for Russia Russia Russia.... And now, just now, you're worried if an allegation is substantiated or not... Classic... LOL"

 

Because there is no DOJ investigation into it to produce the evidence you seek.

 

Then the house should impeach him and let the senate decide.

 

Unless they're going after Trump, them anything goes. Right?

 

Whoa! Somebody's triggered!

 

Those allegations were investigated and found to be meritless.

 

When did these things happen to tRump?

 

Operation Crossfire Hurricane

 

Example?

 

Crossfire Hurricane is a shining example of how the FBI agents involved in the investigation kept their mouths shut when they could have gone to the media and sabotaged Trump's campaign. Just as Comey announcing he had reopened the investigation into Hillary Clinton caused a stir, how do you think the FBI announcing they were investigating ties between Russia and the Trump campaign would have gone over weeks before the election?