Michael Brown Shot 6 Times - All From the Front

Why? If they have a peaceful neighborhood then it should be all good. We as a society shouldn't need citizens putting their own life on the line everyday they go to work to protect and have a bunch of people who hate them because they are white. let them all take care of themselves. Police yourselves if you don't like cops.

 

And if I didn't know any better I would say you were a troll..........but wait you are.

You see, no charges = no corruption.

Everything in that piece is "alleged" since none of it came out in a trial.

I wouldn't expect you to see that this is anything more than a fanning of the flames.

 

Matches up to background audio from video taken by another witness.
Of course soo far most are choosing to ignore the audio of a man giving his account.

 

LOL a blog G T F O .

 

It's Jake Tapper's.

 

Does not matter..........its second hand information...........otherwise known as hearsay.

I do not anticipate getting the officers statement until after investigations are complete and either, No charges are filed, or they will come out in a Federal Trial.

 

This is absolutely comical. I'm a troll? You're acting as if this incident was just a honest mistake and no harm was done? What reality do you live in? Ferguson, MO?

 

Hmmm.....if this is true it's pretty much over

Local St. Louis sources said Wilson suffered an “orbital blowout fracture to the eye socket.” This comes from a source within the District Attorney’s office and confirmed by the St. Louis County Police.

http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/201...-eye-socket-during-encounter-with-mike-brown/

 

Yes sir........a troll indeed.

You make assertions as if you know what is reality.

It just makes you look foolish.

Your opinion is of no consequence to this case.

 

What part of that article isn't reality? Are you saying the article is fictitious?

 

It's something to keep in mind but don't say just cause it's a blog it is invalid.

 

If it is true that would be good news for the officer. BUT I guees what your saying is you have seen no witness state that the boy was bullrushing the officer. SO How can you post like it is fact when you have no basis for your statement. Did this bullrush come to you as a vision or where did you come up with this ?????story

 

The article is real.............the story on the other hand was deemed in a criminal court.......unworthy

 

The account is being reported beyond blogs.
I just saw it go by on CNN.
It's a female telling what the officer told her. So I agree it can't be taken as the officers 1st hand account, which will come out later.
However it certainly matches that audio from one witnesses video taken moments after Brown died.

Take from that whatever you choose, just sharing info.

To hear the audio simply go to youtube and search " Michael Brown shooting video background audio ".

 

Not hard to find.
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/201...-darren-wilsons-version-of-ferguson-shooting/

 

Its invalid until proven otherwise.

Its not more valid than these "eyewitness" statements we have so far.

I'm not discounting it, I'm just saying to wait n see

 

It's a second hand account of a friend of the cop's. It also matches what dozens of witnesses are saying. If somebody doesn't accept that as worthwhile information, so-be-it.

 

again......who has verified the authenticity of the background audio.

I'm not discounting it, its just additional "unverified" information at this point

- - - Updated - - -

Link to a post I stated such.

Hint, you will not find it.

 

I agree with that verification is needed all around.
Like I said just sharing info on the ongoing situation.

 

The article makes only mention to the civil suit. The details are clearly written in the article. It's just another example of the Ferguson PD manhandling an innocent civilian.

 

I asked for an eyewitness. I've seen that. Thats not an eyewitness. Thats an article stating that the police told here there were witnesses. Heresay that dont count. I have only seen 3 witness, and they all say the same thing. Until I see someone contradict them, that all I got . Your little link takes me to someone who claims someone told her about these unnamed witness. I'm not saying they don't exist, but until I hear from another witness , its 3-ZIP. How you can make your claims with nothing to back them up is a mystery to me

 

So you have no knowledge that Ferguson Police issued Tazers? The Police Dept where I live don't carry them. Why? Cost. BTW Ferguson is the same approximate population and police presence as where I live where they don't carry Tazers due to the cost. The Tazers themselves cost between $500 and $1000 each. The dart cartridges (not reusable) are between $50 to $100 each. The batteries cost between $40 and $80 and the chargers cost $100 to $120 each.

http://www.taser.com/

You are assuming that all that "riot gear and armored vehicles" actually belong to the Ferguson PD........

Then there's the State Police that were called in early on.

Here's a little data on Ferguson MO.

Even Atlanta didn't have them till 2012.

Convinced?

 

i'm just curious why you're afraid to see their findings

 

One post you say hearsay don't count, next post you use hearsay as your source of imformation

 

There is the you tube video with a witness telling the story in the background. http://youtu.be/SKKWBNSqtS0?t=6m1s