With the world sitting on the brink of war 2000 year following a man's birth, with sit on a question of the side of deciding who's right. We consider ourselves a Christian nation. We consider our political power and ties based on God and the son we consider of God. That being said, can a women with (X/X) chromosomes produce the needed (X/Y) chromosome paternal to produce a man without the presence of a man. For immaculate conception to occur, the child of a human woman would have to be a clone and be another woman if possible at all. Jesus could not be the son of God given the limitations of the human body. Even bending those limitations would only make him the daughter of God at best. As modern people with an understanding of how the body and reproduction occurs, we must begin to accept facts and move away from the idea of war to protect religious ideology.I know we can't get Moslem people to do the same but as a people we need to move away from letting the ideas of a few people of historic times dictate or current practice that could lead to the death of millions of modern people.
Maybe a good blood letting religious war is exactly what we need to eliminate a good portion of the disease.
So you don't like religion? What little things are you doing in your private life that turn you against religion? You smoke a little dope? Ya got a crush on a same gender dude or dudette? You cheat a little bit there on your taxes? What? Don't worry. Nobody's going to force you to change. Well, the Muslim extremists might or Communists or Socialists, but they won't take power. Christians won't force you. At least the level-headed ones, which is most. If it's just guilt that makes you not like religion, that's a battle you'll have to win yourself even if religion goes away. If you try to convince us that you actually believe that religion is bad, period, the smart ones aren't going to buy that you actually believe that. If you'll concede that you perhaps simply misunderstand what religion is,...I could buy that.
Since "immaculate conception" occured only once and since no one studied how it occured, how can you say "the child of a human woman would have to be a clone and be another woman if possible at all"? Who did the study?
I actually believe in God due to the fact we exist in a universe or beyond that has no beginning or end. There is a glue that provides form as well as balance but there are laws as well. One law is that a human woman requires a male to reproduce.
There isn't any any record beyond people that didn't witness this said conception or birth of its happening as the New Testament Bible stories where written well after the death of the man they speak of. There is also no mention by Jesus himself of not being born of man. If a child is conceived of a women, which by Gods law of nature lack the Y chromosome. By Gods law, a male requires the Y chromosome to be created. Thus for a male to be produced within an active earthly human group, by the laws set forth in nature for humans. This male could not magically appear in the womb of a woman DNA coded as a woman. Also, the child would lack a second donor to provide a seperate DNA sequence thus making the female the only DNA sequence provider to the egg. Thus the egg that would then have been created would be the replica of the female who gave birth. http://anthro.palomar.edu/abnormal/abnormal_5.htm
Ok,you first.Explain how man came about.If man came about thru evolution and the Ape,then how did the Ape form. Surely not from whole cloth.
