Prophecy -- something we were taught at Fundamentalist Baptist Madrassa could be worked toward, that by being in plain English such so-called prophecy, like my house is a Castle, is in essence not prophetic because it could be subconsciously or deliberately worked toward like any goal. First use on State Department web-site: "The United States deplores any intentional effort to denigrate the religious beliefs of others." (Clinton) The next day: "We reject all efforts to denigrate the religious beliefs of others." (Obama, in the Rose Garden) Now replace any intentional effort and all efforts with the first of the Bill of Rights, and others with anything whatsoever. "The United States deplores [freedom of speech] to denigrate the religious beliefs of [those that commit crimes against humanity in the name of their god]." (Clinton) Since our founding, the United States has been a nation that respects all faiths. (Obama in the Rose Garden) Since All faiths includes those that commit crimes against humanity, those which commit genocide of unbelievers, therefore, it was a lie. Criminal That which the law abiding do not respect as equals. When we free a criminal we become their equal. Prisoner of War to be released at the end of conflict, not a criminal, for the POW is our equal. Satanic Verses verses that commit crimes against humanity. Antichrist that which makes crimes against humanity our equal. Denigration example: Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it. (John 8:44) Service not to be confused with enlistment, but that which one does while in service. Served with honor and distinction legally according to the UCMJ facts not in evidence in the Bergdahl case, but from the perspective of the war in Afghanistan was unjust and the crimes against humanity were playing by the rules of warfare, desertion could be. Playing by the rules of warfare example of liberal attitude on this matter, a direct quote: If terrorists are so faceless as you say how is it we know and have known who they are? How is it they have told us and continue to tell us who they are - these people have faces and they are playing by the rules of warfare - attack, kill or terrorize the opposition. (evryman69) When thinking of Boko Haram, and the female captives in the war booty of the Hadith that MoHamMads men were having coitus interruptus with, we use the modified quote which comes after the one above: Rape is not an enemy but a technique of warfare -- political intimidation through the selective breeding of unarmed non-combatants. (Zbigview Brznutski, Obama supporter) (Terrorized by 'War on Rape' - Washingtonpurplethrobbingpost) http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/03/23/AR2007032301613.html "The United States deplores any intentional effort to denigrate the religious beliefs of [Boko Haram]." (Clinton) MILF -- Bergdahls mom. Did Obama believe we would only think with our little head when he put his arm around a MILF in the Rose Garden? "The United States deplores any intentional effort to denigrate the religious beliefs of [the Antichrist]." (Clinton) The question is, is Obama incompetent or insanely fulfilling prophecy and becoming the Obamanation of Desolation?
I think Obama is accomplishing exactly what he has intended from his first day in office. That's why Rush Limbaugh said "I hope he fails" because it was so predictable yet the fanatical Obama supporting liberals think that with their Messiah's next executive order they will get their utopia fairy tale. Say "baaahhhhh" sheepies.
I don't think it's incompetence. He promised the "fundamental transformation of America" Seems like it's working to me.
"Bush was right: We're not at war with Islam" http://www.cnn.com/2010/OPINION/09/13/zelizer.bush.muslims/index.html "Those who feel like they can intimidate our fellow citizens to take out their anger don't represent the best of America; they represent the worst of humankind, and they should be ashamed of that kind of behavior," Bush said. .
Its like you guys think we cant remember you folks hate this country. You trashed its economy along wth the entire world economy twice in one lifetime now with your deregulation for deregulations sake. You LIED this country into a war for oil profits. why would anyone vote R ever again? http://www.politicalforum.com/current-events/359711-why-did-scotus-say-keep-punishing-rs.html WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court has refused to lift a 30-year consent decree that bars the Republican National Committee from targeting racial and ethnic minorities in its efforts to end fraudulent voting. The justices without comment turned down an appeal from RNC lawyers who said the decree has become “antiquated” and is “increasingly used as political weapon” by Democrats during national campaigns. Its why you have to cheat
Most people who voted for Obama never looked at his political record, never listened to what he said, never looked at his life, his parents, his schools, or his friends. They only saw a black man and/or a democrat.
Bush was right about intimidation, the Obama and Clinton conspiracy of intimidation and oppression with regard to the YouTube video was illegal and punishable with up to ten years in prison; we should not be at war with those who believe MoHamMad was a false prophet. This needs an impeachment trial: Were going to have that person arrested and prosecuted that did the video, said Hillary Clinton. http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/331806/incredible-shrinking-president-mark-steyn The word Were makes it a conspiracy, and the parole violation, which is not the stated reason to arrest (a physical act of intimidation), is irrelevant to the conspiracy to intimidate the First Amendment right of freedom of speech: If two or more persons conspire to injure, oppress, threaten, or intimidate any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured to him by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or because of his having so exercised the same; or http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/241 "[T]he fact that society may find speech offensive is not a sufficient reason for suppressing it. Indeed, if it is the speaker's opinion that gives offense, that consequence is a reason for according it constitutional protection. [485 U.S. 46, 56] For it is a central tenet of the First Amendment that the government must remain neutral in the marketplace of ideas. Id., at 745-746. http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=US&vol=485&invol=46 The holy texts are Islam, and always will be, but Islam just like every religion (even those that have taxes and are really nations) is also defined by individual belief, where the individuals of a Nation/State through laws may reject or accept a verse or saying of a so-called "prophet" depending upon their own conscience; we cannot be at war with Islam any more than we can be at war with Judaism for similar texts that punish homosexuality Christians in the South quoted Paul to sustain slavery, the North quoted Jesus, laws and Amendments passed reject that old Southern Christianity; similarly to be peaceful Islam has to reject things their so-called prophet approved of. Bushs comments from your link did not violate the oath to protect the Constitution against all enemies foreign and domestic, but Obama and Clintons actions did.
Well---------------it is probably one or the other. Either way he comes out as being the worst president ever.
are you still talking about the guy that went back to prison for using a computer when using a computer was forbidden by his parole... he screwed himself on that one and cause people to think this was just another protest when in fact it was an attack
The State Department dealt with the Phantom (*)(*)(*)(*)ter when the New Zealand government went through them to get to the United States Navy, but I assure you that such a parole violation is not in the chain of command of the State department; the criminal oath breaker said they were arresting him for a video (free speech), a violation of oath of office and crime. That was the narrative they wanted, to attack our freedom of speech as the root cause not Barry’s Islam.
