National Geographic's Professional Hit Job on 9/11 Truth

You just can't stop being disengenuous about 9/11 can you?

 

So you're saying that you're wrong. That it was the expert's opinion that it was incendiaries and not explosives.

Got it.

 

Isn't that flamebaiting? I am not being disingenuous. I simply do not have as much knowledge as the high rise building "Experts who Speak Out." I am not part of their movement. I am simply a guy on the Internet with plenty of building background promoting the truth about 9/11.

 

According to my dictionary incendiaries are explosives. I do not in any way represent David Chandler or Jonathan Cole. I link to their website so that anyone can read their positions for themselves. 911SpeakOut.org

 

So you think it was "go boom" explosives and not thermite, incindiery, cause fire explosives like Cole says.

So you disagree with him?

 

From wikipedia,

 

I am saying that airplanes and office fires did not collapse any buildings on 9/11 because that was impossible. I do not know how they did it.

- - - Updated - - -

Okay. Thanks.

 

Your position is that it's impossible for a building to collapse without explosives?

 

It's an observation....and you're promoting your version of what you want the truth to be,bereft of reality

 

Now that is not what I wrote is it? Perhaps you could quote where I implied that.

 

I agree, planes flying around a building that is on fire have no chance of bringing the building down, however, a plane flown INTO a building at 450+mph, LOADED with fuel for a transcontinental flight, causing severe structural damage and widespread fires throughout the buildings, that's a recipe for disaster...

 

What besides explosives do you believe could have caused the buildings to collapse?

 

It is a recipe for disaster, I agree, but it can not cause global collapse. It is impossible. That is what the high rise building experts with 30 and 40 years experience who are speaking out are trying to get people to understand. 911SpeakOut.org

The truthers have nothing to gain by telling the truth other than getting the truth told. The people who are guilty of causing 9/11 have a lot to lose and many of them are in positions of power.

 

Seen their website, very unimpressive, and unconvincing.

 

I know!!!!! The most awsome force known to man!!! Gravity!!!!

 

Maybe you should try and read it too.

- - - Updated - - -

Why doesnt' gravity bring other burning buildings down in less than 15 second collapse?

 

How many buildings were impacted by a fully fueled jetliner at 450+ mph, causing severe damage to the support structure? When are you going to compare all the variables instead of one or two? But if I had to venture a guess, I would refer to the construction of the towers and building 7, each of which were unique WTC being a tube in tube design and building 7 being built over the top of a Con Edison substation, lead to unusual construction designs.

 

gravity brought down the all-steel section of the Windsor Tower in Madrid.

 

But the concrete was still standing!!! So that building stood up to the fires.....(truther response mode, ignoring the fact that concrete was not part of the support structure for the WTC.) #sarcasmoff

 

Bump for Dr Builder:

You said that you didn't say the only way buildings collapse is with explosives. Please answer the above question.

 

Nice strawman I said nothing of the sort. Their designs were unique. You're a freakin builder, you should understand, shockingly(not really) you don't.

Never said this either, but how many building codes and fire codes have changed worldwide as a result of the events of 9/11? C'mon Mr. General Contractor, an expert like you should be able to rattle off the hundreds upon hundreds of codes that have changed as a direct result of what is known from 9/11.

At least you can admit defeat, unlike most truthers I know. I spoke to Jesus, he will pray for you.

 

Yet another question that Dr. Builder obviously can't answer.

He's sure that explosives were necessary for the building to have collapsed, but he denies that explosives were the only way the buildings could have collapsed. (and he's not sure why)

It must be difficult being a truther.

 

Too many! Far too many!

 

Exactly, improvements in the building code, to make them safer in a post 9/11 world. I'm sure you think that is part of the conspiracy though. So I just have to ask, How many people in high places in how many agencies would it take to pull off this massive conspiracy?

 

Really,and people LOVE to blab......I'm sure there would have been someone with nothing to lose,that would spill the beans.....